Bigfoot - unknown to science humanoid creature. IN different cultures they gave him different names. Among the most famous: Yeti, Bigfoot, Sasquatch. The attitude towards Bigfoot is quite ambiguous. There is no officially confirmed data on the existence of Bigfoot today. However, many claim that there is evidence of its existence, but official science does not want or cannot consider it as physical evidence. In addition to numerous videos and photos, which, frankly speaking, are not 100% proof, as they can be ordinary fakes, there are cryptozoologists, ufologists and researchers of the phenomenon Bigfoot there are casts of footprints, hair of a Sasquatch, and in one of the monasteries in Nepal there is supposedly a whole scalp of this creature. However, such evidence is insufficient to confirm the existence of this hominid. The only evidence that official science cannot argue with will be Bigfoot, so to speak, in person, who will allow himself to be examined and experiments carried out on himself.
According to some scientists, yeti are miraculously preserved to this day, who were expelled by the Cro-Magnons (the ancestors of people) into forests and mountains, and since then they have lived far from people and try not to show themselves to them. Despite the rapid flourishing of humanity, the world remains great amount places where Bigfoot can hide and exist undetected for the time being. According to other versions, bigfoot is a completely different species of apes, which are neither the ancestors of humans nor the Neanderthals, but represent their own branch of evolution. These are upright primates that can have a fairly developed mind, since throughout large quantity time, they skillfully hide from people and do not allow themselves to be discovered. In the recent past, yeti were often mistaken for feral people who went into the forest, grew hair and lost their usual human appearance, but numerous witnesses describe clearly not feral people, since people and unknown creatures, judging by the descriptions, they differ strikingly.
In the bulk of evidence, the Sasquatch was seen either in forested areas of the Earth, where large forested areas, or in high mountain areas where people rarely climb. In such regions, which have been explored very little by people, various animals may live that have not yet been discovered by science, and Bigfoot may be one of them.
Most of the descriptions of this creature, and descriptions from different regions of the planet, coincide. Witnesses describe Bigfoot, How large creature, reaching a height of 3 meters, with a strong, muscular physique. Bigfoot has a pointed skull and dark-colored face, long arms and short legs, a massive jaw and a short neck. The Yeti is completely covered with hair - black, red, white or gray, and the hair on the head is longer than on the body. Sometimes witnesses emphasize that Bigfoot has a short mustache and beard.
Scientists have suggested that yetis are very difficult to find because they hide their homes very carefully, and people or people who approach their homes begin to scare away with crackling noises, howls, roars or screams. Such sounds, by the way, are also described in the mythology of the past, in particular, in the mythology of the ancient Slavs, where they were attributed to Leshem and his assistants, for example, the forest spirit Squealer, who pretends to knock to scare away a person or, on the contrary, to lead him into a swamp or quagmire. Researchers claim that forest yetis can build nests in the dense crowns of trees, and so skillfully that a person, even passing by and looking at the crown of a tree, will not notice anything. There are also theories that yetis dig holes and live underground, which makes them even more difficult to spot. Mountain yetis live in remote caves that are located in hard-to-reach places.
It is believed that it was these wild creatures of great stature and covered with hair that became the prototypes of various characters in the mythology of the peoples of the world, for example, Russian Leshy or ancient Greek Satyrs, Roman Fauns, Scandinavian Trolls or Indian Rakshasas. Just think about it, because they believe in the Yeti almost everywhere: Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan (Yeti), Azerbaijan (Guley-Bani), Yakutia (Chuchunna), Mongolia (Almas), China (Ezhen), Kazakhstan (Kiik-Adam and Albasty) , Russia (bigfoot, goblin, shishiga), Persia (div), Ukraine (chugaister), Pamir (dev), Tatarstan and Bashkiria (shurale, yarymtyk), Chuvashia (arsuri), Siberian Tatars (pitsen), Akhazia (abnauayu) , Canada (Sasquatch), Chukotka (Teryk, Girkychavylin, Myrygdy, Kiltanya, Arynk, Arysa, Rackem, Julia), Sumatra and Kalimantan (Batatut), Africa (Agogwe, Kakundakari and Ki-lomba) and so on.
It is worth noting that today the issue of the existence of the Yeti is considered only by separate, private and independent organizations. However, in the USSR the problem of finding the Yeti was considered state level. The amount of evidence of the appearance of this creature was so large that they simply stopped doubting its existence. On January 31, 1957, a meeting of the Academy of Sciences was held in Moscow, the agenda of which included only one single item, “About Bigfoot.” They searched for this creature for several years, sent expeditions to various regions countries where evidence of its appearance had previously been recorded, but after fruitless attempts to find the mysterious creature, the program was curtailed, and only enthusiasts began to deal with this issue. Enthusiasts to this day do not lose hope of meeting Bigfoot and proving to the whole world that these are not just myths and legends, but a real creature that perhaps needs human support and help.
A real reward has been announced for the capture of Bigfoot. The governor promises 1,000,000 rubles to the lucky winner Kemerovo region Aman Tuleyev. However, it is worth saying that if you meet the owner of the forest on a forest path, then first of all you need to think about how to get away, and not make a profit from it. Maybe it’s for the better that people didn’t put Bigfoot on a chain or in one of the cages at the zoo. Over time, interest in these creatures has disappeared, and now many simply refuse to believe in it, mistaking all evidence for fiction. This, undoubtedly, plays into the hands of forest people, and if they really exist, then they should not yet meet curious people, scientists, reporters, tourists and poachers who will definitely ruin their quiet existence.
Big Foot. Latest eyewitnesses
Since prehistoric times, human fear of the unknown has given rise to legends about bloodthirsty monsters living in places untouched by civilization. It is still unknown, for example, whether it exists only in fairy tales or whether there is real scientific evidence.
Myths and testimonies of ancient peoples
The legendary animal has many names, depending on the region where it was seen:
- Nepalese Yeti;
- American Sasquatch or Bigfoot;
- Australian Yowie;
- Chinese Yeren.
Titles minche And tzu-tech in the Tibetan language, the unknown beast is classified as a bear.
The Lepcha people of India, who live in the Sikkim Himalaya region, revere a "creature from the glacier" described as resembling a prehistoric one. hominid, considered the deity of hunting and appearance compares him to a bear.
In the Bon religion, the blood of the mi-rgod or “wild man” was used for special ceremonies.
Scientists study the yeti phenomenon
When eyewitness accounts were fragmentary and no records, bones or other physical evidence were found, anthropologists hypothesized that Bigfoot was a hominid, a descendant of Neanderthals who survived to this day. Carl Linnaeus came up with the name Homo troglodytes(cave man).
- The first documented tracks were described by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Howard-Bury in the book “Mount Everest. Intelligence" in 1921. A guide from the local Sherpa people told the climber that he had seen what the Tibetans call metoh-kangmi or “wild man of the snows.”
- In 1925 photographer Tombazi on the slope of Zemu noticed a tall creature with red fur at an altitude of 4600m. above sea level, and also discovered footprints belonging to a bipedal, five-toed hominid with a foot length of 33 cm.
- In the territory former USSR In Abkhazia there lives a family whose ancestor, according to the stories of local residents, is the wild monkey-like Zana. IN late XIX centuries, Prince Achba caught her and gave her to his vassal, who brought the savage to Tkhina. Rural centenarians say that Zana’s body was covered with long gray hair, her height reached two meters, she ran faster than horses and carried weights without much effort.
- Since 1975 the candidate began studying the descendants of Zana historical sciences Igor Burtsev. He managed to get permission to dig up and send for examination the skull of the son of an unusual woman, Tkhin. The results showed that these people originated from West Africa. It is also believed that Zana was simply a mentally retarded runaway.
What does Bigfoot look like?
IN popular culture The image of Bigfoot was formed as a monkey-like creature of gigantic size with white skin and elongated forelimbs. People fear him as a monster that can drag away and eat people. This idea differs from the one that cryptozoologists form based on eyewitness accounts.
If we summarize the impressions of the lucky ones who saw the tracks of the animal and himself, the yeti really looks like a huge upright orangutan, whose height reaches 3 m. The body of the animal is covered with brown, gray or red hair, the head is approximately twice the size of a human and has a pointed shape.
He deftly moves through mountains and climbs trees, surpassing people in strength and speed. Scientists suggest that Bigfoot is an omnivore, feeding on small animals, insects and berries.
Where does the legendary Bigfoot live?
Judging by the legends, the descendant of ancient primates likes to hide in the mountains. Yeti is known in more than dozens of regions on three continents:
- They talk about encounters with an unknown “wild man” in the Himalayas, Dagestan, Abkhazia, Bhutan, Pamir, the Caucasus, the Urals, Chukotka;
- More than 300 evidence was recorded in China;
- Arriving on the Australian continent, the Europeans encountered wild ape-like aborigines and even fought with them;
- North America and Canada also have their own legend about the Sasquatch.
Since Bigfoot was encountered most often in the territory of the former USSR, in 1957. A Commission was created at the Academy of Sciences, which brought together scientists from related specialties (geologist, mountaineer, doctor, anthropologist) to study the phenomenon. However, this work did not produce serious results.
Does Bigfoot really exist?
At the end of the 20th century, only cryptozoologists and fanatics believed in the reality of the Yeti. The scientific community considered all information concerning the hominid to be erroneous or fabricated. However, in 2013 Oxford University professor Brian Sykes and his team conducted a genetic analysis of the hair of a mummified Bigfoot from Ladakh, North India, and wool found by one of the residents of Bhutan. These samples were between 20 and 40 years old. The result showed that the DNA of the samples matched 100% with the genetic material of the ancestor of polar bears, who lived during the Pleistocene era, that is, from 40,000 to 120,000 years ago.
After publishing this news, Brian Sykes continued to collect genetic material from everyone who claimed to have encountered the monster. The remaining samples obtained belonged to different types predators, domestic dogs, some turned out to be plant and even synthetic fibers.
In 2016, a paper was presented at the 69th Annual Anthropological Research Conference in the USA. It dealt with the study of teeth marks discovered in 2013-2014. in the Mount St. Helens area of Washington State. Mitchell Townsend argued that the impressions on the rib bones of deer indicate a hominid with a jaw twice the size of a human. The scientist concluded that the animal that gnawed the ribs held them with one hand, as primates do.
IN beginning of XXI century, the approach to the issue of searching for information about ancient monsters has changed. If previously a big role was played by the subjective ideas of scientists about the findings and stories of witnesses, now there are tools that give accurate answers. Based on new data, debates continue in the pseudo-scientific community about whether Bigfoot exists or not. We can only wait for the next discoveries to put an end to this issue.
5 most reliable video facts of the existence of the Yeti
In this video, anthropologist Vladimir Perevalov will show real-life footage in which he managed to capture Bigfoot:
There is a lot of unknown and unexplored things in the world. One of the controversial topics for scientists is Bigfoot; there are debates about who he is and where he came from. Various opinions and versions are expressed, and each of them has its own justification.
Does Bigfoot exist?
Yes and no, depends on who and by what characteristics are classified as this category of living organisms:
- There are several names for it, for example, Sasquatch, Yeti, Almasty, Bigfoot and a number of others. Lives high in the mountains in the central and northeast asia, as well as in the Himalayas, but there is no reliable confirmation of its existence;
- There is an opinion of Professor B.F. Porshnev that it is the so-called relict (preserved from ancient times) hominid, that is, it belongs to the order of primates, which includes humans as a biological genus and species;
- Academician A. B. Migdal in one of his articles cited the opinion of an oceanologist regarding reality Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot. Its essence was that there is no reason to believe in it, despite the fact that we would very much like to: the basis scientific approach consists in its proof;
- According to paleontologist K. Eskov, this subject, in principle, can live in certain natural habitats. At the same time, according to the zoologist, the location of the creature in this case should be known and studied by professionals.
There is also a point of view that snow man is a representative of an alternative branch of the evolution of the human race.
What does Bigfoot look like?
Descriptions of the Yeti are not very diverse:
- The creature looks like human face with dark skin, rather long arms, with short neck and hips, heavy lower jaw, pointed head shape. The muscular and dense body is covered with thick hair, which is shorter in length than the hair on the head. Body length varies from the usual average human height to approximately 3 meters in height;
- Greater dexterity is noted when climbing trees;
- The length of the foot is reported to be up to 40 cm in length and 17-18 and even up to 35 cm in width;
- In the descriptions there is information that the yeti’s palm is also covered with hair, and they themselves look like monkeys;
- In one of the regions of Abkhazia in the second half of the 19th century, there lived a wild, hairy woman named Zana, who had children from men from the local population.
Stories about encounters with Bigfoot are accompanied by descriptions of huge, fur-covered creatures that instill fear and horror, which can even cause people to lose consciousness or get a mental disorder.
Who are cryptozoologists and what do they do?
The term is derived from the words “cryptos”, which is translated from Greek as hidden, secret, and “zoology” - to everyone famous science about the animal world, which includes humans:
- At the end of the 80s of the last century in our country, enthusiasts created a society of cryptozoologists, engaged in the search and study of Bigfoot as a special branch of humanoid creatures that have survived from ancient times and exist in parallel with “homo sapiens”;
- It is not part of academic science, although at one time it was “assigned” to the Ministry of Culture Soviet Union. One of the most active founders of the society was the doctor M.-J. Kofman, a participant in the expedition to the Pamirs to search for Bigfoot, organized through the Academy of Sciences in 1958, and a member of a special commission, which included famous scientists in the field of geology, botany, anthropology, physics;
- A huge role in developing the issue of relict hominids was played by Professor B.F. Porshnev, who considered this problem not only from the point of view of paleontology, but also included a worldview approach based on social role modern man, as opposed to its purely biological functions.
This society still exists today, and its members publish their works.
What is the correct name for hominids?
The name “Bigfoot” appeared in the 20s of the last century, and according to one version, it is due to inaccuracy of translation:
- It does not at all indicate that the creature constantly lives in the snows of the highlands, although it can appear there during its movements and transitions. At the same time, it finds food below this zone, in forests and meadows;
- Boris Fedorovich Porshnev believed that given by creatures, belonging to the hominid family, not only cannot be associated with snow, but, by and large, there is no reason to call him a man in the sense as we understand it. Residents of the areas in which the research was conducted do not use this name. The scientist generally considered this term random and not corresponding to the essence of the subject of study;
- Professor-geographer E.M. Murzaev mentioned in one of his works that the name “Bigfoot” was a literal translation of the word “bear” from some languages of the peoples of Central Asia. Many people understood it in the literal sense, which introduced a certain confusion of concepts. This is quoted by L. N. Gumilyov in his work on Tibet.
IN different regions country and world it has many local “names”.
Bigfoot theme in art
He is present in various traditions and legends, and is the “hero” of feature films and animated films:
- The half-fantastic “Wandering Chukchi” played the role of Bigfoot in the folklore of the northern peoples of Siberia. Indigenous and Russian population believed in his existence;
- About wild people called chuchunami And mulens, says Yakut and Evenki folklore. These characters wore animal skins and had long hair, tall stature and slurred speech. They were very strong, ran fast, and carried bows and arrows. They could steal food or deer, or attack a person.
- Russian scientist and writer Peter Dravert in the 30s, based on local stories, published an article about these, as he called, primitive people. At the same time, his reviewer Ksenofontov believed that this information refers to the area of ancient beliefs of the Yakuts, who believed in spirits;
- Several films have been made on the theme of Bigfoot, ranging from horror to comedy. These include Eldar Ryazanov’s film “The Man from Nowhere,” a number of American films, and the German cartoon “Trouble in the Himalayas.”
In the state of Bhutan, a tourist route called the “Bigfoot Trail” has been laid through the mountains.
Just like in Marshak’s poems about an unknown hero whom everyone is looking for but cannot find. They even know his name - Bigfoot. Who he is - it’s just not possible to determine for sure, and whether he exists in principle.
6 rare videos about Yeti
In this video, Andrei Voloshin will show rare footage proving the existence of Bigfoot:
The vastness of our vast planet holds many secrets. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these secrets was Bigfoot.
Yeti, Bigfoot, Angey, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that it belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, and the genus humans.
Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers today we have Full description this creature.
What does the legendary cryptid look like?
The most popular image of Bigfoot
Its physique is dense and muscular with a thick coat of hair over the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who have met the yeti, remain completely naked.
The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.
The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and sparse.
The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.
The height of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.
Bigfoot's body features also include long arms and short hips.
The habitat of the yeti is a controversial issue, since people claim to have seen it in America, Asia and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.
These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.
But no matter how carefully the Bigfoot people tried to hide, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.
First eyewitnesses
The first people to see the mysterious creature in person were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not isolated, but numbered about a hundred cases.
After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition to search for traces.
Thanks to the collaboration of two prominent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, confirmation of the existence of the Yeti was found.
The find was hair that was believed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary had the opportunity to examine the scalp again.
His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.
As one would expect, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmation of the previously put forward theory.
Bigfoot scalp
In addition to the found hairline, the affiliation of which still remains controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.
Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.
Photos are often very Bad quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine whether these frames are real or fake.
The footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, are considered by scientists to be the traces of known animals living in the area where they were found.
And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow one to establish for certain the fact of their existence.
Bigfoot on video
However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.
They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn on the river bank they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been discovered, immediately went on the run.
Grabbing the camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with the unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.
The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who long years tried to prove or disprove the existence mythical creature.
Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson
A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.
The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.
The video showed a clear image of the creature's body and limbs, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming.
Some features of the body structure allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from video frames with prehistoric ancestor human - Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large in size: height reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.
After much research, the film was found to be authentic.
In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who initiated this filming, his relatives and friends reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual marks were left by artificial forms.
But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the filmed footage in a suit.
They concluded that at the time the film was made, it was impossible to carry out such a high-quality production.
There were other encounters with an unusual creature, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, other than oral stories of people.
A woman named Zana from Abkhazia
An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.
Raisa Khvitovna, granddaughter of Zana - daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria
The description of her appearance is similar to existing descriptions of Bigfoot: red fur that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on the rest of her body.
She did not speak articulately, but made only shouts and isolated sounds.
The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave her a fierce appearance.
Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.
Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.
According to some sources, their origin dates back to West Africa.
The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during Zana’s life, and therefore cannot be ruled out in other regions.
Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret
One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the yeti was the Japanese mountaineer Makoto Nebuka.
He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years while exploring the Himalayas.
After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a brown himalayan bear.
The book containing his research describes some Interesting Facts. It turns out that the word "Yeti" is nothing more than a corruption of the word "Meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.
Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts came together, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.
Research of different countries
Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.
The commission for the study of Bigfoot included geologists, anthropologists and botanists. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.
However, then the work of the commission was stopped, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on the research.
Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. A professor at Oxford University, after analyzing the hair, proved that it belonged to a polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.
Still from a film filmed in Northern California on 10/20/1967
Currently, discussions are ongoing.
The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.
All the available facts today do not give one hundred percent confidence in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.
Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered evidence of the existence of the object being studied.
Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.
This is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to incorrect results.
Someone is sure that science is silent about the fact of their existence and will publish false research, because there are so many eyewitnesses.
But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.
, “Ramayana” (“rakshasas”), folklore different nations(faun, satyr and strong in Ancient Greece, yeti in Tibet and Nepal, byaban-guli in Azerbaijan, chuchunny, chuchunaa in Yakutia, almas in Mongolia, ieren, maoren and en-khsung in China, kiikadam and albasty in Kazakhstan, goblin, shish and shishiga among Russians, divas in Persia (and Ancient Rus'), devs and albasty in the Pamirs, shural and yarymtyk among the Kazan Tatars and Bashkirs, arsuri among the Chuvash, picen among the Siberian Tatars, sasquatch in Canada, teryk, girkychavylin, mirygdy, kiltanya, arynk, arysa, rekkem, julia in Chukotka, batatut, sedapa and orangpendek in Sumatra and Kalimantan, agogwe, kakundakari and kilomba in Africa, etc.).
Plutarch wrote that there was a case of the capture of a satyr by the soldiers of the Roman commander Sulla. Diodorus Siculus claimed that several satyrs were sent to the tyrant Dionysius. These strange creatures were depicted on vases of Ancient Greece, Rome and Carthage.
An Etruscan silver jug in the Roman Museum of Prehistory depicts a scene of armed hunters on horseback chasing a huge ape-man. And in the psalter of Queen Mary, relating to XIV century, depicts an attack by a pack of dogs on a furry man.
Eyewitnesses of Bigfoot
At the beginning of the 15th century, the Turks captured a European named Hans Schiltenberger and sent him to the court of Tamerlane, who transferred the prisoner to the retinue of the Mongol prince Edigei. Schiltenberger still managed to return to Europe in 1472 and published a book about his adventures, in which, among other things, he mentioned wild people:
High in the mountains lives a wild tribe that has nothing in common with all other people. The skin of these creatures is covered with hair, which is not found only on their palms and faces. They gallop through the mountains like wild animals, feed on leaves, grass and anything they can find. The local ruler presented Edigei with a gift of two forest people- a man and a woman captured in dense thickets.
The Indians of the northwestern United States and Western Canada believe in the existence of wild people. In 1792, the Spanish botanist and naturalist José Mariano Mosinho wrote:
I don’t know what to say about Matlox, a resident of the mountainous region, who brings everyone into indescribable horror. According to descriptions, this is a real monster: its body is covered with stiff black stubble, its head resembles a human one, but much more large sizes, fangs more powerful and sharper than those of a bear, arms of incredible length, and long curved claws on the fingers and toes.
Turgenev and the US President personally encountered Bigfoot
Our compatriot, the great writer Ivan Turgenev, while hunting in Polesie, personally encountered Bigfoot. He told Flaubert and Maupassant about this, and the latter described it in his memoirs.
« While still young, he(Turgenev) Once I was hunting in a Russian forest. He wandered all day and in the evening he came to the bank of a quiet river. It flowed under the canopy of trees, all overgrown with grass, deep, cold, clean. The hunter was overcome by an irresistible desire to plunge into this clear water.
Having undressed, he threw himself into her. He was tall, strong, strong and a good swimmer. He calmly surrendered to the will of the current, which quietly carried him away. Grasses and roots touched his body, and light touch the stems were nice.
Suddenly someone's hand touched his shoulder. He quickly turned around and saw a strange creature who was looking at him with greedy curiosity. It looked either like a woman or like a monkey. He had a wide, wrinkled face that grimaced and laughed. Something indescribable - two bags of some kind, obviously breasts - were dangling in front. Long, tangled hair, reddened by the sun, framed her face and flowed behind her back.
Turgenev felt a wild, chilling fear of the supernatural. Without thinking, without trying to understand or comprehend what it was, he swam with all his might to the shore. But the monster swam even faster and touched his neck, back and legs with a joyful squeal.
Finally, the young man, mad with fear, reached the shore and ran as fast as he could through the forest, leaving behind his clothes and gun. A strange creature followed him. It ran just as fast and still squealed.
The exhausted fugitive - his legs were giving way from horror - was already ready to fall when a boy armed with a whip came running, tending a herd of goats. He began to whip the disgusting humanoid beast, which took off running, uttering cries of pain. Soon this creature, similar to a female gorilla, disappeared into the thicket».
As it turned out, the shepherd had already met this creature before. He told the master that she was just a local holy fool, who had long gone to live in the forest and had gone completely wild there. Turgenev, however, noticed that due to wildness, hair does not grow all over the body.
US President Theodore Roosevelt also met with Bigfoot. He included this story, artistically revised, in his book “The Wild Beast Hunter.” The story takes place in the Beet Mountains, between Idaho and Montana. From there, by the way, we still receive evidence of encounters with Bigfoot people.
In the first half of the 19th century, trapper (that is, a hunter who sets traps) Bauman and his friend explored the wild gorge. Their camp was constantly ravaged by some huge creature, which moved on two, not four, legs. The attacks occurred either at night or during the day in the absence of hunters, and therefore it was not possible to really see the creature. One day a comrade remained in the camp, and Bauman, returning, found him torn to pieces. The tracks surrounding the body were identical to human ones, but looked much larger.
Bigfoot children
Very interesting meeting with Bigfoot in 1924, she was expecting lumberjack Albert Ostman. He spent the night in a sleeping bag in the forest near Vancouver. Big Foot He grabbed it, put it right in the bag on his shoulder and carried it. He walked for three hours and brought Ostman to the cave, where, in addition to the yeti who kidnapped him, there were also his wife and two children.
The lumberjack did not eat, but was received quite hospitably: they offered to eat spruce shoots, which the snowmen ate. Ostman refused and survived for a week on canned food from his backpack, which big Foot I prudently took it with me.
But soon Ostman realized the reason for such hospitality: he was being prepared to be the husband of the already grown-up daughter of the head of the family. Imagining the wedding night, Ostman decided to take a risk and sprinkled snuff into the food of the hospitable hosts.
While they were rinsing their mouths, he rushed out of the cave as fast as he could. For many years he did not tell anyone about his adventure and when asked where he had been for a whole week, he simply remained silent. But when there was talk about snow people, the old man's tongue was loosened.
Yeti woman
It is documented that in the 19th century in Abkhazia, in the village of Tkhina, there lived among people a woman, Zana, who looked like a Bigfoot and had several children from the people, who later integrated normally into human society. This is how eyewitnesses described it:
Reddish fur covered her grayish-black skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on the rest of her body. She uttered inarticulate cries, but was never able to learn to speak. Her large face with prominent cheekbones, a strongly protruding jaw, powerful brow ridges and large white teeth had a fierce expression.
In 1964, Boris Porshnev, the author of a book about the relict hominid, met with some of Zana’s granddaughters. According to his description, the skin of these granddaughters - their names were Chaliqua and Taya - was dark, of a negroid type, the chewing muscles were highly developed, and the jaws were extremely powerful.
Porshnev even managed to ask village residents who, as children, attended Zana’s funeral in the 1880s.
Russian zoologist K. A. Satunin, who in 1899 saw a female relict hominid in the Talysh Mountains in the southern Caucasus, draws attention to the fact that “the movements of the creature were completely human.”
Bigfoot in captivity
In the 20s of the XX century Central Asia several were caught yeti, imprisoned and, after unsuccessful interrogations, shot as Basmachi.
The story of the warden of this prison is known. He watched two bigfoot located in the chamber. One was young, healthy, strong, he could not come to terms with lack of freedom and was raging all the time. The other one, the old one, sat quietly. They ate nothing but raw meat. When one of the commanders saw that the warden was only feeding these prisoners raw meat, he shamed him:
- You can’t do that, after all, people...
According to the information of people who participated in the fight against the Basmachi, there were still about 50 similar subjects who, due to their “savagery,” did not pose a danger to the population of Central Asia and the revolution, and it was very difficult to catch them.
The certificate of a lieutenant colonel of the medical service is known Soviet army B. S. Karapetyan, who in 1941 examined a living Bigfoot caught in Dagestan. He described his meeting with the yeti like this:
« Together with two representatives local authorities I entered the barn... I still see, as if in reality, a male creature appearing in front of me, completely naked, barefoot.
Without a doubt, this was a man with complete human body, despite the fact that his chest, back and shoulders were covered with shaggy dark brown fur 2–3 centimeters long, very similar to that of a bear.
Below the chest, this fur was thinner and softer, and on the palms and soles it was not there at all. Only sparse hair grew on the wrists with rough skin, but the lush head of hair, very rough to the touch, went down to the shoulders and partially covered the forehead.
Although the entire face was covered with sparse hair, there was no beard or mustache. There was also sparse, short hair growing around the mouth.
The man stood completely straight, with his hands at his sides. His height was slightly above average - about 180 cm, however, he seemed to tower over me, standing with his powerful chest stuck out. And in general he was much larger than anyone local resident. His eyes expressed absolutely nothing: empty and indifferent, they were the eyes of an animal. Yes, in fact, he was an animal, nothing more».
Unfortunately, during the retreat of our army, the hominid was shot.
Bigfoot in the Himalayas
But the snow people from the Himalayas became most famous; relict hominids there are locally called “Yeti.”
For the first time about these unusual inhabitants mountains became known from the notes of English officers and officials who served in India. The author of the first mention is considered to be B. Hodgson, from 1820 to 1843 the plenipotentiary representative of Great Britain at the court of the King of Nepal. He described in some detail how, during his journey through Northern Nepal, porters were horrified when they saw a hairy, tailless creature that looked like a man.
Several Buddhist monasteries claim to have Yeti remains, including scalps. Western researchers have long been interested in these relics, and in 1960 Edmund Hillary managed to obtain a scalp from the Khumjung Monastery for scientific examination.
Around the same time, relics from several other Tibetan monasteries were examined. Specifically, the mummified hand of Bigfoot. The results of the examination were questioned by many, and there were supporters of the versions of both a fake and an incomprehensible artifact.
Bigfoot people were hiding in the Pamir caves
Major General of the Soviet Army M. S. Topilsky recalled how in 1925 he and his unit pursued the snow people hiding in the Pamir caves. One of the prisoners said that in one of the caves he and his comrades were attacked by several creatures similar to apes. Topilsky examined the cave, where he discovered the corpse mysterious creature. In his report he wrote:
« At first glance, it seemed to me that this was really an ape: hair covered the body from head to toe. However, I know very well that apes not found in the Pamirs.
Taking a closer look, I saw that the corpse resembled a human one. We tugged at the fur, suspecting it was a camouflage, but it turned out to be natural and belonged to the creature.
Then we measured the body, turning it several times on its stomach and again on its back, and our doctor carefully examined it, after which it became obvious that the corpse was not human.
The body belonged to a male creature, approximately 165–170 cm tall, judging by the gray hair in several places, middle-aged or even elderly... His face was dark in color, without a mustache or beard. There were bald patches at the temples, and the back of the head was covered with thick, matted hair.
The dead man lay with with open eyes, baring his teeth. The eyes were dark in color, and the teeth were large and even, shaped like human ones. The forehead is low, with powerful brow ridges. Strongly protruding cheekbones made the creature's face look Mongoloid. The nose is flat, with a deeply concave bridge. The ears are hairless, pointed, and the lobes are longer than those of humans. The lower jaw is extremely massive. The creature had a powerful chest and well-developed muscles».
Bigfoot in Russia
There were many encounters with Bigfoot in Russia. The most remarkable, perhaps, occurred in 1989 in Saratov region. The guards of the collective farm garden, having heard a suspicious noise in the branches, caught a certain humanoid creature eating apples, in all respects similar to the notorious Yeti.
However, this became clear when the stranger was already tied up: before this, the watchmen thought that he was just a thief. When they were convinced that the stranger did not understand human language, and in general did not look much like a person, they loaded him into the trunk of a Zhiguli and called the police, the press and the authorities. But the yeti managed to untie himself, opened the trunk and ran away. When a few hours later all those summoned arrived at the collective farm garden, the guards found themselves in a very awkward position.
Bigfoot caught on video
Actually, there are hundreds of evidence of encounters of varying proximity with Bigfoot. Much more interesting is material evidence. Two researchers managed to film Bigfoot on a movie camera in 1967. These 46 seconds became a real sensation in the world of science. Professor D. D. Donskoy, Head of the Department of Biomechanics Central Institute physical education, comments on this short film as follows:
« After repeated examination of the gait of a bipedal creature and a detailed study of poses on photographic prints from film, the impression remains of a well-automated, highly sophisticated system of movements. All private movements are united into a single whole, into a well-functioning system. The movements are coordinated, repeated equally from step to step, which can only be explained by the stable interaction of all muscle groups.
Finally, we can note such a feature, which cannot be accurately described, as the expressiveness of movements... This is characteristic of deeply automatic movements with their high perfection...
All this taken together allows us to evaluate the creature’s gait as natural, without noticeable signs of artificiality, characteristic of various kinds of deliberate imitations. The creature's gait in question is completely atypical for humans.».
The English biomechanist Dr. D. Grieve, who was very skeptical about relict hominids, wrote:
« The possibility of counterfeiting is excluded».
After the death of one of the film's writers, Patterson, his film was declared a fake, but no evidence was presented. It is worth recognizing that the notorious yellow press, in pursuit of sensations, often not only invents them, but also likes to expose past ones, both imaginary and real. So far there is no reason not to recognize this film as a documentary.
Despite a lot of evidence (sometimes from people who deserve absolute trust), the vast majority scientific world refuses to acknowledge the existence of Bigfoot. The reasons are that the bones of wild people have not yet been allegedly discovered, not to mention the living wild person himself.
Meanwhile, a number of examinations (we talked about some of them above) allowed us to come to the conclusion that the presented remains cannot belong to anyone recognized by science. What's the matter? Or are we again faced with the Procrustean bed of modern science?
Loading...
