Modern military equipment is becoming more and more futuristic. But it’s one thing if such an appearance is justified by technological features, for example, when fancy contours of the surfaces of ship or aircraft hulls are a way to reduce their visibility in the radar field. And it’s completely different when such exterior delights are born in the heads of “fashion designers” from the defense industry in pursuit of a trend, without reference to real needs. At the same time, neither the functionality of technical means nor their combat effectiveness matters here. Image decides everything - this seems to be the main principle of some current developers of “concepts” in the military sphere. According to the Swedish franchise The Polish tank PL-01, a recent brainchild of the local arms company OBRUM and the British company BAE Systems, created on the basis of the chassis of the Swedish armored vehicle Strf 90. The international composition of the developers did not add credibility to the car: the tank, first presented to the public three years ago at an exhibition in the Polish city of Kielce, received and continues to receive numerous critical reviews from experts. First, What is being questioned is the vehicle’s ability to perform the functions of a tank, that is, to be the main striking unit on the battlefield. The fact is that the base for the Polish tank - the Swedish ground forces infantry fighting vehicle Strf 90 - was created precisely as an infantry fighting vehicle. Development began in 1984. Weak armor, focus on transporting troops, as well as low-power weapons, intended mainly to support advancing infantry in close combat, are the main features of this type of equipment. Another negative point was the weak engine - only about 550 horsepower, which is modern tank, equipped with tons of armor, is negligible. Nevertheless, the Swedish “franchise”, taken as the basis for the Polish project, was optimized, and the reenactors tried to turn all the shortcomings into advantages. Thus, weak armor was replaced by a modular ceramic-aramid coating with the installation of additional armor panels on the turret and hull. Also, on the hull of the former infantry fighting vehicle, which overnight turned into a tank, a material was laid that supposedly absorbs radio waves and is capable of providing a “thermal camouflage” effect. As the designers assured, such a system will be able to read temperature readings environment and change the heating of the tank’s surface, hiding its thermal footprint. Glamor crept up unnoticed True, none of these innovations were ever implemented in practice. PL-01 was and remains a concept, a single copy. The public is content with only a futuristic look new car. There is no information about field tests or real tests. It has only been announced that the previous 550-horsepower engine will be replaced with a 940-horsepower one. However, in the performance of the new power plant None of the experts have yet been convinced. But there is no doubt that the new design focuses on glamor. Bizarre external shapes, a gun casing stylized like a space blaster, unnatural curves of the hull - all this, apparently, is intended to show the triumph of the technical thought of British and Polish innovators in the field of tank building. By the way, BAE Systems, which joined the consortium for the PL-01 project, specializes in developments in the aerospace field. Is this why there were so many aviation motifs in the model of the new tank? By the way, they tried to create for the crew of the car the conditions, if not of a passenger airliner, then of a pilot’s cabin. We did not forget, in particular, about comfortable ergonomic chairs, an air conditioning system and a navigator, automatic transmission gears and even about a driving assistance system similar to those installed on sophisticated SUVs. As for the main thing – the armament – ​​this part of the PL-01’s history is vague. It has not even been decided yet which gun will be installed on the vehicle – either a 105 mm or a 120 mm one. It is only known that the good old Soviet “Utes” machine gun, the 12.7-mm NSV, was included in the equipment of the new tank as a course machine gun. Shooting at random Today, promotion rules the world. The task is not so much to surprise with truly quality and decent characteristics new technology, but to shock, amaze, and secure in advance superiority over competitors. This applies to all types of products, and military products are no exception. Moreover, this is done mainly through words and information support. In the same Poland, at the suggestion of local media, the PL-01 was assigned the term “Armata killer”, which seems to hint at the superiority of the converted Swedish infantry fighting vehicle over Russian tank. True, the Polish car did not receive such flattering characteristics for its unique abilities on the battlefield, but for the same shocking appearance. Experts compared both cars. What can I say, the conclusions for the Poles are disappointing. “The Almata killer is unlikely to be able to even get close to its “victim”: the powerful 125-mm cannon will not allow the PL-01 even within radar visibility range,” believes Russian expert Gennady Nechaev. – The presence of a fourth-generation dynamic armor system in the Russian vehicle, capable of reflecting with a probability of more than 95% all types of shots from RPGs and sub-caliber anti-tank shells, the use of the complex active protection new generation, phased array antenna and a number of other not just modern - revolutionary solutions in advance put Armata an order of magnitude higher than most developments. And even more so when we are talking about a converted infantry fighting vehicle of the 1984 model...” “The unusual appearance of the tank is due to the purely aesthetic views of the authors of the project,” says another expert in the field of technology and weapons, candidate historical sciences Vyacheslav Shpakovsky. – However, “beautiful” is not an indicator for a tank, since a tank is not an airplane. The “aesthetics” is most clearly manifested in the original casing that covers the gun. Moreover, only a small part of the barrel and the muzzle brake extend beyond the front sheet of the casing. Today, none of the modern main battle tanks have a muzzle brake, much less a slot type, which has as many as nine slots. The fact is that, as military experience has shown, the presence of a muzzle brake on a tank gun negatively affects the accuracy of shooting over long distances. When gases pass through, the barrel jerks as many times as there are outlets for gases on it. At a distance of one and a half to two kilometers, such a deviation can reach several meters!” “Dummy” worth billions of zlotys On the forums of fans of armored vehicles, the Polish development was completely torn to smithereens. “They took a Swedish sub-tank, covered it with foam plastic, painted it and called it a “concept”.” “All kinds of “composite armor”, “uninhabited tower” exist only in theory, they promise to develop them if they get money.” “Poland is a poor country, they can’t even afford to repair the German Leopard-2s they got for free, because in exercises and use T-72s, for which there have been spare parts and a repair base since Soviet times.” Indeed, today the Polish ground forces are in service with over five hundred T-72Ms and only less than one and a half hundred Leopards manufactured in 1984–1986, transferred from the German army. At the same time, according to the contract, the Poles must carry out repairs and maintenance German tanks only by the manufacturer using original spare parts. This is more than noticeable for the country’s defense budget! What is there to do with the development of a new tank, and even based on equipment of a foreign state, from which copyright holders may also require special service conditions. By the way, as rightly draws attention former boss headquarters of the armaments department of the Volga Military District, reserve colonel Valentin Fetisov, the Germans at one time tried to propose a project for modernizing the Marder infantry fighting vehicle with the installation of a turret from the Leopard-1 tank with a semi-automatic 105 mm caliber cannon. However, the resulting “product” turned out to be so bulky and heavy and weakly armored, that in its characteristics it was noticeably inferior even to the far from new Soviet T-55 tank. As a result, the German defense industry abandoned the idea of ​​such a modernization. According to Polish media, the start of production of the PL-01 is scheduled for a couple of years at best - by 2018. The release of at least one “running” tank is planned for this year - a functional experimental vehicle on which it will be possible to conduct tests. The model exhibited in Kielce was only a technological demonstration sample. And this again distinguishes the Polish-British “craft” from the Russian T-14, a full-fledged state order for which has already been placed, and, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, there are no plans to reduce it even in the current difficult economic conditions.

Anyone interested in the history of Polish tank building knows that before the Second World War, several types of tankettes and one type of light tank, the 7TR, were mass-produced in Poland. However, Polish designers developed armored vehicles in the 1930s for various purposes. Infantry support tank (9TR), wheeled-tracked tank (10TR), cruising tank (14TR), amphibious tank (4TR). But, in addition to this, in the second half of the 1930s, the Polish Armament Directorate decided to create first medium and then heavy tanks for the army. These unrealized programs will be discussed. When writing about Polish medium/heavy tanks, they often use the indices 20TR, 25TR, 40TR and others. Let us immediately make a reservation that these indices were constructed by researchers according to the 7TP (7-Tonowy Polski) type, but in reality the projects did not have such an alphanumeric designation.

A rough drawing of one of the BBT medium tank variants. Br. Panc.


Program " C zołg średni" (1937-1942).
In the mid-1930s, the command Polish army came to the conclusion that it was necessary to develop a medium tank for the Polish Army, which could solve not only the tasks of accompanying infantry (for which tanks 7 were intendedTPand wedgesTKS), but also as a breakthrough tank, as well as for the destruction of fortified points.

The program was adopted in 1937 under the simple name “Czołg średni" ("medium tank"). Arms Committee (KSUST) determined the initial parameters of the technical specifications, inviting the designers to focus on the project of the English medium tank A6 (Vickers 16 t.), also mentioning that a similar tank is in service with the “probable enemy” - the USSR (T-28). An additional incentive for the Polish military leadership to develop their own medium tank was intelligence information about the start of production of Nb tanks in Germany. Fz. Accordingly, Polish "Czołg średni" had to, at a minimum, correspond to the A6 and T-28 (these tanks were considered equivalent by the Poles) in terms of technical parameters, and not be inferior in strengthNb. Fz.,and ideally surpass them. Specialists Artillery Directorate The Polish troops proposed using a 75mm gun of the 1897 model as the main weapon. The weight of the designed tank was initially limited to 16-20 tons, however, later the limit was increased to 25 tons.

Comparison of the dimensions of the KSUST project medium tank with " probable opponents" T-28 and Nb. Fz.

The program itself was designed for 5 years - until 1942, when, according to the plan of the Polish command, the army was supposed to receive a sufficient number of serial medium tanks.

The development of the tank was entrusted to leading Polish engineering firms under the general leadership of the Armament Committee.

The first projects were ready by 1938 - these were the developments of designers who worked in the committee itself (KSUST 1 option) and the option proposed by the companyBiura Badan Technicznych Broni Panzernych ( BBT. Br. Panc.).

I version of the KSUST medium tank.

I version of the medium tankBBT. Br. Panc.

According to tactical and technical data (see table below) they were very close, except that the specialistsBBT. Br. Panc. They proposed, in addition to the option with a 75mm gun, to create a tank with a long-barreled 40mm semi-automatic gun based on anti-aircraft gun Bofors. This configuration was well suited for combating armored targets - since the initial velocity of anti-aircraft gun shells was very high. Both projects featured 2 small machine gun turrets capable of firing at the tank's direction.

By the end of 1938, the company presented its projectDzial Silnikowy PZlzn. ( D.S. PZlzn.). This project differs significantly from others in that engineersD.S. PZlzn. (lead engineer Eduard Habich) decided not to follow exactly the instructions of the armament committee regarding tactical and technical data, but created an original concept of a medium tank based on their own developments. The fact is that this company developed “high-speed tanks” for the Polish Army on a Christie-type suspension. In 1937, an experimental tank 10 was createdTP, close in its characteristics to Soviet tanks BT-5, and in 1938 the development of a cruising tank with reinforced armor and 14TR armament began. Based on the developments under the 14TP project, the “сzołg” version was createduśredniego", presented to the weapons committee.

Compared to the 14TR project, the “medium tank” had a slightly longer hull and significantly increased armor ( frontal armor 50mm for the first option and 60mm for the last), a powerful engine of 550 hp was supposed to be installed. or a pair of 300 hp engines, which was supposed to provide the tank with a speed of up to 45 km/h. As for weapons, instead of the initially planned installation of a 47mm anti-tank gun (as on the 14TR), it was decided to use a 75mm gun, created on the basis of an anti-aircraftWz. 1922/1924with a barrel length of 40 calibers, which also had a small recoil, which made it possible to place it in a compact turret. Such a weapon had very high armor penetration and was suitable both for fighting tanks and for destroying long-term fortifications. An expanded turret was designed for this gun, and the designers abandoned small turrets, replacing them with machine guns mounted on the front and coaxial with the gun.

The company's medium tank project D.S. PZlzn.

In fact, if this project had been implemented with the declared characteristics before 1940, then Poland would have received perhaps the most powerful medium tank in the world, with armor close to its contemporary heavy tanks. You may recall that in the USSR in 1939, tests of the A-32 tank began, which had slightly less armor and a significantly weaker 76mm gun, and the German army in 1939/40 had a medium tank Pz. IV with 15 - 30 mm armor and a short-barreled 75 mm gun.

75mm guns intended for installation in a medium tank
(both the difference in barrel length and in the magnitude of recoil are clearly visible).

At the beginning of 1939, BBT. Br. Panc. presented new project of your tank in two versions. While maintaining the general layout, the engineers changed the purpose of the tank - it became a high-speed, specialized tank for combating armored targets. There was a refusal to use the 75mm infantry gun; instead it was proposed to use a 40mm semi-automatic or 47mm anti-tank gun. Having offered an option with a 500-horsepower gasoline engine (or a twin 300-horsepower engine), the developers expected that their tank would reach a speed of 40 km/h on the highway. At the same time, the armor (frontal part of the hull) was also increased to 50 mm. A new smaller turret for the 40mm gun and a different version of the chassis were also developed. The weight of the designed tank increased to the maximum allowed by the second edition of the Armaments Committee requirements of 25 tons.

II version of the medium tankBBT. Br. Panc. with a 47mm anti-tank gun.

II version of the medium tankBBT. Br. Panc. with a 40mm gun,
a different chassis design and a smaller turret.

However, although the projects of the companies DS PZlzn. and BBT. Br. Panc. were not rejected by the armament committee (DS PZlzn. at the beginning of 1939, funds were even allocated to create a wooden full-size mock-up), more attention was paid to the revised project by the committee's specialists (KSUST 2 option).

Based on an analysis of company proposalsBBT. Br. Panc. AndD.S. PZlzn., engineers working in the armaments committee presented a new project at the end of 1938. Having retained the basic layout (including the three-turret design), as well as the 75mm gun mod. 1897, as the main armament, they rebuilt the engine compartment and the rear part of the hull according to the example of the projectBBT. Br. Panc., and instead of a 320-horsepower diesel engine, they decided to use a pair of 300-horsepower gasoline engines, as the company’s specialists suggestedD.S. PZlzn., which made it possible to achieve the same speed parameters as those of the competitor. It was also decided to bring the project in terms of armor to 50mm (front of the hull). All this was supposed to weigh 23 tons (the projectD.S. PZlzn- 25 tons), but later the design weight was increased to 25 tons.

II version of the KSUST medium tank.

The Polish military expected to begin the test prototype tank in 1940, but the war did not allow these plans to be realized. By the beginning of the war, the company's work had progressed the mostD.S. PZlzn., which made a wooden model of the tank. According to some reports, this model was destroyed, as well as the unfinished one experimental tank 14TR, as the Germans approached.

Program "Czolgciezki"(1940-1945).

In 1939, when the design of a medium tank reached the stage of producing full-size mock-ups, representatives of the Armament Committee proposed starting a program to create a heavy tank "Czolgciezki" The main parameters were: purpose - breaking through fortified lines and supporting infantry; armor providing invulnerability to anti-tank guns; maximum weight - 40 tons. The program was designed for 5 years (1940-1945).

Several heavy tank concepts are known to have been created in Poland in 1939.

One of them belongs to the Armament Committee specialists Buzhnovits, Ulrich, Grabsky and Ivanitsky, abbreviated from the first letters of their surnames, the project was called “ B. U. G. I." The authors were based on the concept of a medium tank (KSUS II option), however, the tank had to have a single turret design, frontal armor and turret armor up to 100mm and, as the main armament, a 75mm caliber infantry gun or a 100mm howitzer.

Exterior drawing of the heavy tank B.U.G.I.

The second concept of a heavy tank from 1939 belongs to E. Habich. Little is known about this tank. Khabich intended to use the same 75mm long-barreled gun in his project anti-aircraft gun, which was supposed to be installed in the project’s medium tankD.S. PZlzn. He intended the chassis to be made according to the type of blocked bogies (3 bogies per side), as in the experimental tank of his development 4TP. The reservation was supposed to be larger than that of the medium tank of the projectD.S. PZlzn., that is, the frontal armor had to exceed 60mm (sometimes there is a mention of the thickness of the frontal armor of the Khabich tank project - 80mm).

Modern reconstruction (as described) of a heavy tank designed by E. Habich.

The third project of a heavy tank was created by Professor of the Lviv Polytechnic Institute Anthony Markovsky. His work was submitted to the Armaments Committee on July 22, 1939. Professor Markovsky proposed the concept of a tank, armed with a 120mm howitzer of the 1878 model and one machine gun, with very strong armor (130mm - hull front, 100mm - sides, 90mm - rear and 110mm - turret ), but low mobility (25-30 km/h when installing a 500-horsepower engine).

Emblem of the Polish armored forces.

The formation of Polish tank forces began in 1919, immediately after the end of the First World War and Poland's independence from Russia. This process took place with strong financial and material support from France. 22 March 1919 505th French tank regiment was transformed into the 1st Polish Tank Regiment. In June, the first train with tanks arrived in Lodz. The regiment had 120 Renault FT17 combat vehicles (72 cannon and 48 machine gun), which in 1920 took part in battles against the Red Army near Bobruisk, in northwestern Poland, in Ukraine and near Warsaw. Losses amounted to 19 tanks, seven of which became trophies of the Red Army.

After the war, Poland received a small number of FT17s to replace losses. Until the mid-30s, these combat vehicles were the most popular in the Polish army: on June 1, 1936, there were 174 of them (together with the later and more advanced models NC1 and M26/27 received for testing).

In the Soviet-Polish War of 1920, 16 - 17 armored vehicles on Ford chassis, manufactured at the Warsaw plant Gerlach i Pulst, took part and became the first examples of armored vehicles of a Polish design. In addition to these vehicles, armored cars that were given to the Poles after the collapse of the Russian Army, as well as those captured from Red Army units and received from France, were also used in battles.

In 1929, Poland acquired a license to produce the English Carden-Loyd Mk VI wedge. In a significantly modified form, under the designation TK-3, its production began in 1931. In the same year, Vickers E light tanks were purchased from Great Britain. Since 1935, a series of them has been launched Polish version 7TP. Work on remaking and improving imported samples was carried out at the Military Engineering Research Institute (Wojskowy Instytut Badari Inzynierii), later renamed the Armored Vehicle Research Bureau (Biuro Badan Technicznych Broni Pancemych). Several original prototypes of combat vehicles were also created here: the PZInz.130 amphibious tank, the 4TR light tank, the 10TR wheeled-tracked tank and others.

The volume of production of armored vehicles at the country's factories did not suit the command of the Polish Army, so purchases abroad were resumed. At the same time, special interest was shown in the French “cavalry” tanks S35 and H35. However, in April 1939, a contract was signed for the supply of 100 R35 tanks. In July, the first 49 vehicles arrived in Poland. Of these, the 21st battalion of light tanks was formed, stationed on the Romanian border. Several of the battalion's combat vehicles took part in battles with both German and Soviet troops. Most of the R35s, avoiding surrender, crossed the border at the end of September, were interned in Romania, and then became part of the Romanian army.

On September 1, 1939 in Polish armored forces(Bran Pancerna) there were 219 TK-3 tankettes, 13 TKF, 169 TKS, 120 7TR tanks, 45 R35, 34 Vickers E, 45 FT17, 8 wz.29 and 80 wz.34 armored vehicles. In addition, a number of combat vehicles different types located in educational units and enterprises. 32 FT17 tanks were part of the armored trains and were used as armored tires. With this tank fleet, Poland entered World War II.

During the fighting, some of the equipment was destroyed, some went to the Wehrmacht as trophies, and a small part went to the Red Army. The Germans practically did not use captured Polish armored vehicles, transferring them mainly to their allies.

The tank units that were part of the Polish Armed Forces in the West were formed according to the staff of the British tank forces. The largest formation was the 1st Panzer Division of General Maczek (the 2nd Warsaw Panzer Division was formed only in 1945 in Italy), which was armed with different time consisted of infantry Matilda tanks and Valentine, cruising Covenanter and Crusader. Before landing in France, the division was rearmed with M5A1 Stuart VI, M4A4 Sherman V, Centaur Mk 1 and Cromwell Mk 4 tanks. The 2nd Polish Tank Brigade, which fought in Italy and took part in the assault on the Monte Cassino monastery, was armed with M4A2 Sherman II tanks and M3A3 Stuart V. Unfortunately, it is not possible to indicate the exact number of combat vehicles in the Polish forces in the West. Approximately, we can assume that in the period from 1943 to 1947, they had about 1000 tanks of the listed types in their arsenal.

In addition to tanks, the troops had many light armored vehicles: British Universal armored personnel carriers, American half-track vehicles, as well as various armored vehicles (there were about 250 American Staghound armored vehicles alone).

Tank units of the Polish Army, which fought together with the Red Army, were, as a rule, equipped with Soviet-made combat vehicles. Between July 1943 and April 1945, 994 armored vehicles were transferred to Polish troops.

ARMORED EQUIPMENT TRANSFERRED BY THE RED ARMY TO THE POLISH ARMY

Tanks:

light tank T-60 3

light tank T-70 53

medium tank T-34 118

medium tank T-34-85 328

heavy tank KB 5

heavy tank IS-2 71

Armored vehicles and armored personnel carriers:

Universal Mk 1 51

BREM:

Note: 21 IS-2 tanks of the 6th heavy tank regiment were returned to the Soviet command after the end of hostilities.

On September 3, 1945, the Polish Army was armed with 263 tanks, 142 self-propelled artillery units, 62 armored vehicles and 45 armored personnel carriers. It was this military equipment that became the basis of the Polish tank forces in the post-war period.

Wedge heel (lekk; czolg rozpoznawczy) TK

The most popular armored vehicle of the Polish army in the 30s. Developed on the basis of the English Carden-Loyd Mk VI wedge, for the production of which Poland acquired a license. Adopted into service by the Polish Army on July 14, 1931. Serial production was carried out by the state enterprise PZIn2 (Panstwowe Zaklady Inzynierii) from 1931 to 1936. About 600 units were produced.

Serial modifications:

TK-3 - the first production version. Riveted, closed top armored hull. Combat weight 2.43 tons. Crew 2 people. Dimensions 2580x1780x1320 mm. Ford A engine, 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 40hp (29.4 kW) at 2200 rpm, displacement 3285 cm?. Armament: 1 Hotchkiss wz.25 machine gun, 7.92 mm caliber. Ammunition capacity: 1800 rounds. 301 units were produced.

TKD - 47 mm wz.25 "Pocisk" cannon behind the shield in the front of the hull. Ammunition capacity: 55 artillery rounds. Combat weight 3 tons. 4 units converted.

TKF-engine Polski FIAT 122B, 6-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 46 l. With. (33.8 kW) at 2600 rpm, displacement 2952 cm?. 18 units produced.

TKS - new armored hull, improved suspension, surveillance devices and weapons installation. 282 units produced.

TKS z nkm 20A - 20 mm FK-A wz.38 automatic cannon of Polish design. Initial speed 870 m/s, rate of fire 320 rounds/min, ammunition capacity 250 rounds. 24 units were rearmed.

On September 1, 1939, TK and TKS tankettes were in service with armored divisions of cavalry brigades and separate companies of reconnaissance tanks subordinate to army headquarters. TKF tankettes were part of the squadron of reconnaissance tanks of the 10th Cavalry Brigade. Regardless of the name, each of the listed units had 13 tankettes. Tank destroyers - combat vehicles armed with 20-mm cannons - were available in the 71st (4 units) and 81st (3 units) divisions, the 11th (4 units) and 101st (4 units). ) companies of reconnaissance tanks, a squadron of reconnaissance tanks of the 10th Cavalry Brigade (4 pieces) and a squadron of reconnaissance tanks of the Warsaw Motorized Armored Brigade (4 pieces). It was these vehicles that were the most combat-ready, since tankettes armed with machine guns turned out to be powerless against German tanks.

The 20-mm cannons of Polish tankettes penetrated armor up to 20-25 mm thick at a distance of 500 - 600 m, which means they could hit light German tanks Pz.l and Pz.ll. The 71st Armored Division, which was part of the Wielkopolska Cavalry Brigade, operated most successfully. On September 14, 1939, supporting the attack of the 7th Mounted Rifle Regiment on Brochow, the division's tankettes destroyed 3 German tanks with their 20-mm cannons! If the rearmament of the tankettes had been completed in full (250 - 300 units), then the German losses from their fire could have been significantly greater.

Captured Polish wedges were practically never used by the Wehrmacht. A certain number of them were transferred to Germany's allies - Hungary, Romania and Croatia.

Based on the wedge, the light artillery tractor S2R was produced in Poland.

TKS z nkm 20A

TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TKS WEDDING SHEET

COMBAT WEIGHT, t: 2.65.

CREW, people: 2.

OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 2560, width - 1760, height - 1330, ground clearance - 330.

WEAPONS: 1 Hotchkiss wz.25 machine gun, 7.92 mm caliber.

AMMUNITION: 2000 rounds.

RESERVATION, mm: front, side, stern - 8...10, roof - 3, bottom - 5.

ENGINE: Polski FIAT 122BC, 6-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 46 hp (33.8 kW) at 2600 rpm, displacement 2952 cm?.

TRANSMISSION: single-disc main dry friction clutch, three-speed gearbox, two-speed range, differential, final drives.

CHASSIS: four rubber-coated support rollers on board, interlocked in pairs into two balancing bogies, suspended on a semi-elliptical leaf spring, four support rollers, an idler wheel, a front drive wheel; caterpillar width 170 mm, track pitch 45 mm.

MAX SPEED, km/h: 40.

POWER RESERVE, km: 180.

OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME: ascent angle, degrees. - 35...38; ditch width, m - 1.1; wall height, m ​​- 0.4; ford depth, m - 0.5.

Light tank (czolg lekki) Vickers E

A light infantry escort tank popular in the 1930s, widely known as the Vickers 6-ton tank. Developed in 1930 by the English company Vickers-Armstrong Ltd. in two versions: Vickers Mk.E mod.A - double-turret, Vickers Mk.E mod.B - single-turret. The contract for the supply of tanks to Poland was concluded on September 16, 1931. Between June 1932 and November 1933, 38 units were manufactured and delivered.

Serial modifications:

mod.A - two-turret version. It differed from the standard English model in the shape of the towers and armament. In Poland, tanks were equipped with a special air intake casing. 22 units delivered.

mod.B - 47 mm Vickers cannon and 7.92 mm Browning wz.30 machine gun in a conical turret, offset to the forward side of the tank. Ammunition 49 rounds and 5940 rounds. 16 units delivered.

On September 1, 1939, the Polish Army had two tank companies armed with Vickers - the 12th (12 Kompanie Czotgow Lekkich) and 121st (121 Kompanie Czotgow Lekkich) light tank companies. Each of them consisted of 16 combat vehicles (three platoons of 5 tanks and a company commander’s tank). The first was formed at the Tank Forces Training Center in Modlin for the Warsaw Motorized Armored Brigade, which was part of the Lublin Army, the second was part of the 10th Cavalry Brigade of the Krakow Army. Both companies took part in battles with the Germans.

Vickers E

TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE Vickers E TANK

COMBAT WEIGHT, t: 7.

CREW, people: 3.

OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 4560, width - 2284, height - 2057, ground clearance - 381.

ARMAMENT: 2 Browning wz.30 machine guns, 7.92 mm caliber.

AMMUNITION: 6600 rounds.

RESERVATION, mm: forehead, hull side - 5...13, stern - 8, roof - 5, turret - 13.

ENGINE: Armstrong Siddeley Puma, 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, air-cooled; power 91.5 hp (67 kW) at 2400 rpm, displacement 6667 cm?.

TRANSMISSION: single-disc main dry friction clutch, five-speed gearbox, driveshaft, side clutches, final drives.

CHASSIS: eight double rubber-coated road wheels on board, interlocked in pairs into four balancing bogies, suspended on quarter-elliptical leaf springs, four support rollers, an idler wheel, a front drive wheel (lantern engagement); each caterpillar has 108 tracks with a width of 258 mm, track pitch is 90 mm.

MAX SPEED, km/h: 37.

POWER RESERVE, km: 120.

OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME: ascent angle, degrees. - 37; ditch width, m - 1.85; wall height, m ​​- 0.76; ford depth, m - 0.9.

Light tank (czolg lekki) 7TP

The only serial Polish tank from the 1930s. Developed in Poland based on the design of the English light tank Vickers Mk.E. Produced by the Ursus plant in Warsaw from 1935 to September 1939. 139 units were produced.

Serial modifications:

double-turret version - turrets and weapons are identical to those installed on light tank Vickers E. Two Browning wz.30 machine guns with 6000 rounds of ammunition. Combat weight 9.4 tons. Dimensions 4750x2400x2181 mm. 38 - 40 units produced.

The single-turret version is a conical turret developed by the Swedish company Bofors. Since 1938, the tower received a rectangular aft niche intended for the installation of a radio station.

On the eve of World War II, 7TR tanks were armed with the 1st and 2nd battalions of light tanks (49 vehicles each). Shortly after the outbreak of war, on September 4, 1939, the 1st Tank Horn of the Warsaw Defense Command was formed at the Tank Forces Training Center in Modlin. It consisted of 11 combat vehicles. There were the same number of tanks in the 2nd light tank company of the Warsaw Defense Command, formed a little later.

The 7TP tanks were better armed than the German Pz.l and Pz.ll, had better maneuverability and were almost as good as them in armor protection. They took an active part in the hostilities, in particular, in the counterattack of Polish troops near Piotrkow Trybunalski, where on September 5 one 7TR from the 2nd battalion of light tanks knocked out five German Pz.l tanks.

The combat vehicles of the 2nd fought the longest tank company, defending Warsaw. They took part in street fighting until September 26th.

Based on the 7TR tank, the S7R artillery tractor was mass-produced.

7TR (double turret)

7TR (single turret)

TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TANK 7TR

COMBAT WEIGHT,t: 9.9.

CREW, people: 3.

OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 4750, width - 2400, height - 2273, ground clearance - 376... 381.

ARMAMENT: 1 wz.37 cannon of 37 mm caliber, 1 wz.30 machine gun of 7.92 mm caliber.

AMMUNITION: shots - 80, cartridges - 3960.

AIMING DEVICES: periscope sight WZ.37C.A.

RESERVATION, mm: hull front - 1 7, side and stern - 1 3, roof - 1 0, bottom - 9.5, turret - 1 5.

ENGINE: Saurer-Diesel V.B.L.Db (PZInz.235), 6-cylinder, diesel, in-line, liquid cooling; power 110 hp (81 kW) at 1800 rpm, displacement 8550 cm?.

TRANSMISSION: multi-disc dry friction main clutch, driveshaft, four-speed gearbox, final clutches, final drives.

CHASSIS: eight double rubber-coated road wheels on board, interlocked in pairs into four balancing bogies, suspended on quarter-elliptical leaf springs, four support rollers, an idler wheel, a front drive wheel (lantern engagement); each caterpillar has 109 tracks with a width of 267 mm.

MAX SPEED, km/h: 32.

POWER RESERVE, km: 150.

OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME: ascent angle, degrees. - 35; ditch width, m - 1.8; wall height, m ​​- 0.7; ford depth, m - 1.

COMMUNICATIONS: N2C radio station (not installed on all tanks).

Armored car (samochod pancerny) wz.29

The first armored car of a completely Polish design. Produced by the Ursus plant (chassis) and the Central Automobile Workshops (armored hull) in Warsaw. In 1931, 13 units were manufactured.

Serial modification:

the chassis of a two-ton Ursus A truck, equipped with an aft control station. The hull and octagonal turret are riveted from rolled armor plates. The turret contained a cannon and two machine guns in ball mounts; the third machine gun was located in the rear hull. By 1939, the machine gun mounted in the roof of the tower and designed to fire at aircraft and the upper floors of buildings was removed.

In 1931, the Ursus entered the armored car squadron of the 4th Cavalry Division, stationed in Lvov. They replaced the Peugeot armored cars of the First World War. In 1936, all wz.29 vehicles were transferred to The educational center tank troops in Modlin, where they were used to train personnel.

On September 1, 1939, the Polish Army had 8 armored vehicles of this type in service. All of them were part of the 11th Armored Division of the Masovian Cavalry Brigade (Modlin Army), deployed on the border with East Prussia. Despite its obsolescence, the Ursus were quite actively used in battles. Thanks to powerful weapons, in some cases they were able to withstand even light German tanks. On September 4, 1939, for example, the 1st platoon of the squadron, supporting the attack of the 7th Lancer Regiment, encountered light German tanks Pz.l. Polish armored cars knocked out two German tanks with fire from their cannons.

After two weeks of fighting, almost all the vehicles were lost, and most of them were out of order due to technical reasons. The remaining Ursus were burned by their crews on September 16, 1939.

TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ARMORED VEHICLE wz.29

COMBAT WEIGHT, t: 4.8.

CREW, people: 4.

OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 5490, width - 1850, height - 2475, wheelbase -3500, track -1510, ground clearance -350.

ARMAMENT: 1 Puteaux wz.18 SA cannon 37 mm caliber, 2 Hotchkiss wz machine guns. caliber 7.92 mm.

AMMUNITION: 96 rounds, 4032 rounds.

RESERVATION, mm: front, side, hull rear - 6...9, roof and bottom - 4, turret - 10.

ENGINE: Ursus2A, 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 35 hp (25.7 kW) at 2600 rpm, displacement 2873 cm?.

TRANSMISSION: dry multi-plate clutch, four-speed gearbox; cardan and final drives, mechanical brakes.

CHASSIS: 4x2 wheel arrangement, tire size 32x6, suspension on semi-elliptic springs.

MAX SPEED, km/h: 35.

POWER RESERVE, km: 380.

OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME: ascent angle, degrees. - 10, ford depth, m - 0.35.

Armored car (samochod pancerny) wz.34

In 1928, the light half-track armored car wz.28 was adopted by the Polish Army. The central automobile workshops produced 90 of these vehicles on the Citroen-Kegresse P. 10 chassis purchased in France. In 1934-1937, they were modernized by army workshops by replacing the caterpillar drive with a conventional automobile axle, and they received the designation wz.34. About a third of the combat vehicles were armed with a cannon, the rest with a machine gun.

Serial modifications:

wz.34 - wz.28 armored car with a Polski FIAT 614 type rear axle. The body is riveted, of simple shape. On the left side there was a door for the driver to sit in, and in the aft wall there was a door for the gunner to sit in. The turret is riveted, octagonal, with a universal ball mount for mounting weapons. Combat weight 2.1 tons. Dimensions 3620x1910x2220 mm. Citroen B-14 engine, 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 20hp (14.7 kW) at 2100 rpm. Maximum speed 55 km/h.

wz.34-1 - Polski FIAT 108 engine, 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 23hp (16.9 kW) at 3600 rpm.

wz.34-11 - rear axle Polski FIAT 618, engine Polski FIAT 108-111.

By the beginning of the Second World War, 10 armored squadrons were equipped with wz.34 armored vehicles, which were part of the 21st, 31st, 32nd, 33rd, 51st, 61st, 62nd, 71st, 81st and 91st armored cavalry divisions brigades of the Polish Army. As a result of intensive use in Peaceful time The outdated equipment of the squadrons was also very worn out. These vehicles did not take a noticeable part in hostilities and were used for reconnaissance. By the end of the battles, almost all of them were shot down or failed due to technical reasons.

TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ARMORED VEHICLE wz.34-II COMBAT WEIGHT, t: 2.2,

CREW, people: 2.

OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 3750, width - 1950, height - 2230, wheelbase - 2400, track - 1180/1 540, ground clearance - 230.

ARMAMENT: 1 Puteaux wz.18 SA cannon of 37 mm caliber or 1 wz.25 machine gun of 7.92 mm caliber.

AMMUNITION: 90... 100 shots or 2000 rounds.

AIMING DEVICES: telescopic sight wz.29.

RESERVATION, mm: 6...8.

ENGINE: Polski FIAT 108-Ш (PZ)nz.117), 4-cylinder, carburetor, in-line, liquid cooling; power 25 hp (18.4 kW) at 3600 rpm, displacement 995 cm3.

TRANSMISSION: single-disc dry friction clutch, four-speed gearbox, cardan and final drives, hydraulic brakes.

CHASSIS: 4x2 wheel arrangement, tire size 30x5, suspension on semi-elliptic springs.

MAX SPEED, km/h: 50. POWER RESERVE, km: 180.

OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME: ascent angle, degrees. - 18; ford depth, m - 0.9.

From the book Equipment and Weapons 2005 04 author Magazine "Equipment and Weapons"

POLAND Infantry fighting vehicles BVVP-1 and BWP-1MSovetsky BMP-1, produced in Poland under license, received the designation BWP-1 (Bojowy Woz Piechoty-1, direct translation of BMP-1). In 2000, the ground forces of the Republic of Poland numbered more than 1,400 infantry fighting vehicles, but about half of these vehicles had already been used up

From the book Messerschmitt Bf 110 author Ivanov S.V.

Poland Germany attacked Poland on September 1, 1939. Over Poland, Goering’s elite units, Zerstorergreppen, received a baptism of fire: 1(Z)/LG-1 and I/ZG-1 as part of Kesselring’s 1st Air Fleet, which operated in the area of ​​the Polish border and East Prussia; I/ ZG-76 in the south as part of the 4th

From the book Gloster Gladiator author Ivanov S.V.

Poland In Polish squadrons Royal Air Force Gladiators were used only in supporting roles. For example, the liaison officer of the 25th Air Group, Lieutenant Colonel Jan Bialy, used courier Gladiators K7927, K8049 and K8046. On Gladiator Mk I K7927 (formerly of the 603rd

From the book Sniper Survival Manual [“Shoot rarely, but accurately!”] author Fedoseev Semyon Leonidovich

Poland SKW "Alex" repeating sniper rifle Despite having its own weapons industry, the Polish army used foreign sniper rifles or modifications thereof. However, their own developments were periodically proposed. So, in 2005

From the book Hawker Hurricane. Part 2 author Ivanov S.V.

Poland The Poles ordered Hurricanes from England in the spring of 1939. At this time, the British government allocated a large loan for Poland, for which aircraft were purchased in England. The Poles' choice of the Hurricane was explained simply. This was the only type of English

From the book Fieseler Storch author Ivanov S.V.

From the book MiG-29 author Ivanov S.V.

Poland We do not have archival data with which to confirm the number of Storchs transferred to Poland after the war, or to trace their fate. It is known that the first Storch, abandoned by the Germans, was transferred to the AK youth aviation school in Bydgoszcz on January 23, 1945. Broadcast

From the book Self-loading pistols author Kashtanov Vladislav Vladimirovich

Poland In 1989, Poland received ten MiG-29 fighters and three MiG-29UB twins; the aircraft entered service with the 1st Fighter Aviation Regiment "Warsaw", based at the Minsk-Mazowiecki airfield. This regiment became the first in the Polish Air Force to receive jets.

From book Nazi Germany by Collie Rupert

Poland VIS 35 Radom VIS 35 produced in 1938 VIS 35 produced in 1939 The VIS pistol was adopted by the Polish Army shortly before the start of the Second World War. The creators of the pistol are Polish designer Piotr Vilniewczyc, a graduate of the Mikhailovsky Artillery Academy,

From the book Intelligence by Sudoplatov. Behind-the-front sabotage work of the NKVD-NKGB in 1941-1945. author Kolpakidi Alexander Ivanovich

Poland: guarantees The Treaty of Versailles cut off East Prussia from the rest of Germany with a strip of land known as the “Polish Corridor”. At the end of this corridor, on the shores of the Baltic Sea, was the former German city of Danzig, now declared “free”

From the book Soldier's Duty [Memoirs of a Wehrmacht general about the war in the west and east of Europe. 1939–1945] author von Choltitz Dietrich

Chapter 22. Poland According to official Soviet data, during the Second World War, 90 Soviet partisan detachments and groups with a total number of about 20 thousand people operated in Poland. It should be taken into account that in 1942–1944, as part of the Soviet

From the book Encyclopedia of Special Forces of the World author Naumov Yuri Yurievich

Poland The time between the Czechoslovak events and the invasion of Poland was well spent. We improved our training, trying to keep our units in excellent condition. Other regiments of the 22nd Division also began landing training with

From the book Battleships of Minor Sea Powers author Trubitsyn Sergey Borisovich

REPUBLIC OF POLAND WIST-94L pistol The WIST-94 pistol was developed by the Polish military institute of technology and weapons WITU (Wо]skowy InstytutTechniczny Uzbrojenia) in 1992–1994. Produced by the Preheg plant located in the city of Lodz. The WIST-94 pistol was adopted by the Polish in 1997

From the book Hitler. Emperor from darkness author Shambarov Valery Evgenievich

Poland The Polish state arose after the First World War on territory that broke away from the German and Russian empires. The young state gained access to the Baltic Sea, but a problem arose where to get warships. We managed to get from the German fleet

From the book Armored vehicles of European countries 1939-1945. author Baryatinsky Mikhail

24. How Poland disappeared Most Germans happily accepted the signing of an agreement with Russia. Indeed, in the most difficult times, after Versailles, our country showed itself to be a reliable friend of Germany. They praised the wisdom of the Fuhrer - what a fine fellow, he fooled the West, snatched everything

From the author's book

Poland Emblem of the armored forces of Poland. The formation of Polish tank forces began in 1919, immediately after the end of the First World War and Poland's independence from Russia. This process took place with strong financial and material support from

During the fighting of World War II, German troops captured a significant number of various armored vehicles in the occupied countries, which were then widely used in the field forces of the Wehrmacht, SS troops and various types of security and police formations. At the same time, some of them were redesigned and rearmed, while the rest were used in their original design. The number of armored fighting vehicles of foreign brands adopted by the Germans fluctuated according to different countries from a few to several hundred.

On September 1, 1939, the Polish armored forces (Vgop Pancerna) had 219 TK-3 tankettes, 13 - TKF, 169 - TKS, 120 7TR tanks, 45 - R35, 34 - Vickers E, 45 - FT17, 8 wz.29 armored vehicles and 80 - wz.34. In addition, a number of combat vehicles of various types were located in training units and at enterprises. 32 FT17 tanks were part of the armored trains and were used as armored tires. With this tank fleet, Poland entered the Second World War.


During the fighting, some of the equipment was destroyed, and the survivors went to the Wehrmacht as trophies. The Germans quickly introduced a significant number of Polish combat vehicles into the Panzerwaffe. In particular, the 203rd separate tank battalion was equipped with 7TR tanks. Along with the TKS wedges, the 7TP tanks also entered the 1st Tank Regiment of the 1st Tank Division. The combat strength of the 4th and 5th tank divisions included TK-3 and TKS tankettes. All of these combat vehicles took part in the victory parade organized by the Germans in Warsaw on October 5, 1939. At the same time, the 7TR tanks of the 203rd battalion were already repainted in standard grey colour Panzerwaffe. However, as it turned out, this action was purely propaganda in nature. Subsequently, captured Polish armored vehicles were not used in Wehrmacht combat units. Panzerkampfwagen tanks 7TP(p) and Leichte Panzerkampfwagen TKS(p) tankettes were soon placed at the disposal of the police and security units of the SS troops. A number of TKS tankettes were transferred to Germany's allies: Hungary, Romania and Croatia.

The captured wz.34 armored vehicles were used by the Germans exclusively for police purposes, since these outdated vehicles had no combat value. A certain number of armored cars of this type were transferred to the Croats and were used by them against the partisans in the Balkans.

Trophy property park. In the foreground is a TKS wedge, in the background is a TK-3 wedge. Poland, 1939

A 7TR light tank abandoned without any visible damage. Poland, 1939. This tank was produced in two versions: double-turret and single-turret. The Wehrmacht used only the second option, armed with a 37-mm cannon, to a limited extent.

The very first clash of tanks on the battlefield occurred on April 24, 1918. near the village of Villers-Bretonneux in northern France. Then three British and three German tanks met. And, although the British and French released several thousand tanks onto the battlefields, they did not meet an enemy worthy or at least equal in number. After all, the Germans built only twenty tanks. Moreover, they used several dozen trophy ones.

In World War II, the main opponents had tens of thousands of combat vehicles. Everyone knows about the grandiose tank battles near El Alamein, Prokhorovka... But the very first was the battle of Polish and German tanks on September 4, 1939 during the battle of Piotrkow.

Invasion German troops into Polish territory occurred at dawn on September 1, 1939 from three sides: north, west and south. From the 1st to the 3rd, clashes took place in the so-called border zone. During this period, one can count about 30 episodes involving tanks, wedges (for reconnaissance purposes) and armored trains. The collision of Polish tanks with German tanks occurred a little later. In the meantime, during this period the Poles lost about 60 armored units, including armored cars.

The second phase of the fighting took place on September 4-6 on the main line of defense of the Polish army. Here the battle broke out in the Piotrków area. We have already talked about it in the previous issue of our magazine. Let us only note that it was then in the area of ​​the village of Ezhów that the first tank battle Second World War.

In this largest such battle (for the Poles), the Polish tank crews failed to significantly strengthen the defense of their troops, but their brave actions delayed the German advance, facilitating the evacuation of Piotrkow without too many losses. The battalion destroyed, according to Polish data, about 15 armored units, but ceased to exist as a single unit. Its losses can be estimated at 13 tanks, mainly from German fire anti-tank artillery. In a battle with German Pz.ll light tanks, the better-armed Polish 7TP light tanks could count on success.


BATTLE ON THE BZURA RIVER. FIRST PHASE (10-13 SEPTEMBER 1939)

On September 10-13, Polish troops tried to stabilize the front west of Warsaw with counterattacks. This led, in particular, to a counter-battle on the Bzura River, the left tributary of the Vistula River. The 62nd and 71st armored divisions (by state - 13 tankettes and seven armored vehicles each) and the 31st and 71st separate companies of reconnaissance tanks (by state - 13 tankettes) took part in this battle. They fought eleven battles with enemy troops.

On September 10, in the battle of Vartkovits, the 62nd Division lost several tankettes and armored vehicles. On the 11th, near the village of Orlya, the division supported the attack of the Pomeranian cavalry brigade, losing two tankettes. The 12th Division supported the attack of the 14th Infantry Regiment and inflicted significant damage on the reconnaissance detachment of the German 221st Infantry Division. The division's actions were assessed as successful.


Battle of the 2nd Tank Battalion during the Battle of Piotrkow






Polish light tank 7TR


On September 10, the 31st separate para of reconnaissance tanks south of Łęczyca had some success in minor skirmishes with the enemy. Prisoners were captured. On the 12th the company was mistakenly subjected to friendly fire. On the 13th she was the last to leave Łęčica. Her actions were also assessed as successful.

The 71st Armored Division, which was part of the Wielkopolska Cavalry Brigade, participated in the reconnaissance search and attacked the German convoy. On the 11th, the division saved an artillery battery from destruction, repelling the onslaught of the Germans. On the 12th, the division supported the Polish infantry counterattack on the village of Glowno. Having stumbled upon a German anti-tank battery, I lost one tankette. He then retreated with his cavalry brigade. The Poles lost the battle on the Bzura River, but the actions of the weak Polish armored units deserved a positive assessment.

It is surprising that the Germans often allocated small forward detachments without proper support. Either they were reconnaissance groups in armored cars and armored personnel carriers, or head marching outposts. But the reconnaissance was carried out unsatisfactorily: often clashes with the Poles were unexpected for the Germans. Artillery batteries and convoys also often found themselves without proper security. Weak units of Polish tanks, wedges and even armored cars achieved noticeable success. Of course, these were minor battles that could not significantly affect the general situation at the front, but they had an undoubted moral significance.


Vickers tank of the Polish army


SECOND PHASE OF THE BATTLE ON THE BZURA RIVER (SEPTEMBER 13-20, 1939)

The 62nd and 71st armored divisions, the 71st, 72nd, 81st, 82nd separate companies of reconnaissance tanks and two armored trains took part in these battles. These forces fought six battles in the areas of Braki, Sochaczw, Brochow, Gurki...

On September 14, the 72nd, 81st and 82nd separate companies of reconnaissance tanks, together with infantry in the Braki area, stopped the advance of the 74th German infantry regiment with a counterattack. The tankettes of these three companies bypassed the Germans from the flank and went to their rear. Lacking artillery support, they suffered heavy losses (at least eight vehicles), but caused disruption in the ranks of the 74th Regiment.

On October 16, tankettes of the 71st separate company of reconnaissance tanks near the village of Yasenets met with tanks of the 2nd tank regiment of the 1st tank division of the Germans, bypassed them, created a threat to the division headquarters, but, having suffered losses, retreated.

On September 17, near Brochow, the remaining combat vehicles of the 62nd armored division, the 71st, 72nd, 81st and 82nd separate companies of reconnaissance tanks were abandoned or destroyed due to damage, lack of fuel and ammunition. A little further, at Gurka, the 62nd armored division found its end. Only the last vehicles of the 71st armored division reached Warsaw with fighting.


BATTLE AT TOMASHOW – LUBELSKY (SEPTEMBER 18-19, 1939)

On September 17, the pincers of the German battle closed in the Brest-nad-Bug area. The Polish units retreating to the east (or their remnants) gathered into the so-called operational group of General Tadeusz Piskor (1889-1951).

It included, in particular, the Warsaw Armored Motorized Brigade (W.B.P.-M.), which gathered under its command all the remnants of Polish armored units. These were the 1st tank battalion, 11th and 33rd armored divisions, 61st, 62nd separate companies of reconnaissance tanks and others. There are about 150 armored units in total.



Battle of Tomaszow-Lubelski


Armored car mod. 1934


Piskor's group tried to escape from the encirclement to the east in the direction of Lvov. It was necessary to break through through the town of Gomaszow-Lubelski, a junction of roads. A breakthrough detachment was formed under the command of Major Kazimierz Majewski from the remnants of the 1st tank battalion, the 11th and 33rd armored divisions and 15 tankettes of the 61st and 62nd th separate companies of reconnaissance tanks.Infantry support was provided by the first regiment of the Warsaw Brigade (regiment of “mounted riflemen”).

On the 18th, at dawn, Mayevsky’s detachment attacked German positions west of Tomashov. On the right flank of the detachment, the attack was carried out by 22 7TR tanks from the 1st tank battalion and a tankette. Having lost only one tank, the Poles crushed the Germans, took the village of Paseki and moved, breaking away from their infantry, towards Tomashov. Having met German light tanks, we drove them back and entered the outskirts of the city. The tankettes of the 33rd armored division, providing the right flank of Mayevsky's detachment, also reached the city. But then the situation changed. The Poles were flanked by German tanks from the area of ​​the village of Jezerna, threatening to cut them off from their infantry. I had to urgently go back. But in this battle, Polish tank crews destroyed six tanks, four armored cars, eight trucks, five anti-tank guns, freed a group of Polish prisoners, and in turn captured about 40 German prisoners.

German tanks were part of the 4th Tank Regiment (very weakened by previous losses) and the 2nd Tank Battalion of the 3rd Tank Regiment of the 2nd Panzer Division. Tanks of the 4th Tank Regiment hit the village of Paseki, and the 3rd Regiment hit Tomashov. During the retreat, two platoons of 7TR tanks knocked out four German tanks, losing one destroyed and seven of their own abandoned.

The remaining Polish tanks and tankettes of the 33rd armored division knocked out two German tanks with fire from the village of Roguzhno.

Attacks by Polish tanks and wedges in the center and left flank of the group were unsuccessful. In the evening, all Polish vehicles retreated behind their infantry positions.

On this day, according to Polish data, up to 20 enemy armored units were destroyed. The Warsaw brigade lost more than half of its combat vehicles. The forces were too unequal, and no amount of courage of the Polish tank crews helped. But the dashing attack on Tomaszow was still reckless and poorly coordinated.

On the 19th in the ranks of the W.B.P.-M. There were seven 7TR tanks left, one Vickers and four wedges. During the day, combat activity died down, the Poles were preparing for a night breakthrough.

The attack began in the dark. The Germans met her with an avalanche of fire. Five tanks immediately caught fire, the remaining three retreated, followed by the Polish infantry. Only 7TP survived. At dawn on September 20, the Polish attack finally fizzled out. Couldn't get through.

At 10:20 a.m. General Piskor informed the Germans that he had agreed to surrender.

The Poles destroyed all remaining armored units. Only isolated small groups of foot tankers emerged from the encirclement to the areas of Warsaw and Lvov.


* * *

The Polish army had two motorized formations that included armored vehicles. This is the 10th Motorized Cavalry and Warsaw Armored Motorized (W.B.P.-M.) Brigade.

The 10th Cavalry Brigade was part of the Krakow Army. In the first days of the war, the 10th Cavalry Brigade fought defensive battles in the south of Polynya. On September 6, near Vishnich, it held back the advance of the 2nd Tank, 3rd Mountain Infantry and 4th Light Divisions of the Germans. By evening, the brigade commander, Colonel Stanislaw Maczek (future commander of the 1st Polish Tank Division in the west), reported that the brigade had suffered up to 80% losses in equipment. Apparently, this applied not so much and not only to armored vehicles, since the brigade units suffered the greatest losses in them on September 8th. Basically they were surrounded. Only the 101st company of reconnaissance tanks remained with the brigade. On September 16 and 17, the brigade made its way to Lvov. On the 18th she received an order from the command to go to the Romanian border. It was joined by several tanks from the 21st Tank Battalion. On the 19th, a brigade of 100 officers and 2,000 soldiers crossed the border. She had with her an R35 tank and four wedges.

The Warsaw brigade was in the reserve of the High Command. The brigade defended on September 1-11 on the Vistula River. On the 12th she fought near Annopol and, finally, on September 19 she fought near Tomaszow-Lubelski. By this moment, several combat units, or rather their remnants, had joined it. Under the command of Major Stefan Majewski they formed perhaps the largest group Polish armored vehicles. On the 20th, the brigade, together with other units of the Polish army, capitulated.

There is no need to cover in more detail the activities of both brigades, if only because these were far from armored formations. We will trace the fate of the companies and squadrons included in them. At the same time, we would like to draw attention to the fact that Polish sources, when mentioning clashes of their armored units, talk about German armored detachments or patrols, in Polish oddzial pancerny. It is not indicated here whether they included tanks or only armored vehicles. Tank in Polish is czolg, and it seems unlikely to us that tankettes, armed only with a machine gun, could successfully fight the Pz.II light tanks, which were then the most popular in the German army.


* * *

Wedge heel TK-3



Review of 7TR tanks in Warsaw


1st battalion of light tanks.

On September 4, the battalion organized a patrol in the vicinity of Przhedbot, and on the 6th its tanks met the enemy. On the 8th he took part in the battles on the Dzhevichka River. Here the 1st and 2nd companies destroyed several enemy seagulls, but they themselves suffered considerable losses, not only in battle, but also during a rather disorderly retreat. The battalion scattered. His small units fought in the Glowaczow region, as well as on the Vistula, where they lost most of their vehicles. After the battle, twenty tanks survived and managed to escape beyond the Vistula.

On September 15, the remnants of the battalion became part of the W.B.P.-M. and on the 17th they repulsed attacks by German tanks near Yuzefov. On the first day of the battle at Tomashov-Lyubelsky, the detachment was successful, inflicting losses on the enemy, capturing prisoners and driving the Germans out of the outskirts of the city. Counterattacks the next day and the final attack on the night of the 20th led to the loss of almost all tanks. On the 20th, together with General Piskor's group, the battalion capitulated.

2nd Light Tank Battalion

On September 1, the battalion became part of the operational group "Pstrkow" and on September 4, two of its companies successfully fought on the Prudka River. On the 5th, the entire battalion fought at Piotrkow and was essentially dismembered. Only part of the 3rd company left the battle. Due to the lack of fuel, the crews abandoned their tanks. The assembled 20 tanks, under the leadership of the commander of the 2nd company, retreated through Warsaw to Brest-nad-Bug. There, from the remnants of the battalion, a company was formed, which fought German tanks near Wlodawa on September 15 and 16. On the 17th the order was received to go to the Romanian border, but the tanks were unable to move. And only the personnel crossed the Hungarian border.

21st Light Tank Battalion

Mobilized on September 7 in Lutsk and entered the reserve of the Supreme High Command. It consisted of 45 Renault R35 tanks. The battalion was sent to reinforce the Malopolska army and on the 14th arrived in Dubno, where it was loaded onto railway platforms, the train only reached Radzivilov. On September 18, 34 tanks of the battalion crossed the Romanian border. From the remnants of the battalion, a half-company was organized on September 14, which became part of the Dubno group on the 19th. On the 22nd, Strumilova fought in the Kamenka area, knocking out several German combat vehicles, but she also suffered losses. Then it moved north and ceased to exist on the 25th.

12th light tank company

Mobilized on August 27, 1939 with 16 Vickers E tanks and intended for W.B.P.-M. At first it was in its reserve and took its first battle on September 13 near Annopol. Her attack was repulsed. In the battle near Tomaszow-Lubelski on September 18, only half of the company, at the cost of heavy losses, was able to help its infantry and repel the attack of German tanks. The night attack on the 19th ended with the loss of all tanks.

111th light tank company

Consisting of 15 Renault tanks, the FT was mobilized on September 6, 1939 and was in the reserve of the Supreme High Command (SHC). Suffered losses from attacks by German aircraft. On the 12th the company fought the Germans, losing several tanks. When retreating to the south, due to the lack of fuel, the tanks were abandoned.

112th company of light tanks.

Mobilized on September 6, 1939 as part of 15 Renault FT tanks and was in the reserve of the Supreme High Command. The company arrived in Brest-nad-Bug, where on September 14 it took part in the battle with German tanks of G. Guderian, literally blocking the gates to Brest Fortress. On the 15th, the company's tanks fired from camouflaged positions. On the 16th the garrison left the fortress. The tankers were unable to remove their vehicles and left them in the fortress.

113th light tank company.

Mobilized on September 6, 1939 as part of 15 Renault FT and was in the reserve of the Supreme High Command. Just like the 112th company ended up in Brest and on the 14th, in battles with German sneakers, it lost all its vehicles.

121st company of light tanks.

It was mobilized on August 15 in Zhurawice as part of 16 Vickers E tanks and was intended for the 10th Motorized Brigade, which became part of the Krakow Army.

Together with the brigade, she moved to the Khabówka area and on September 3 twice repelled enemy attacks near Krzeczów. The 4th ensured local success for the infantry near Kasina Wielka.

On 5 and 6 September the company took part in counterattacks in the area of ​​Dobrzyc and Wisnjic. When the brigade retreated, the tanks found themselves without fuel, and having received it, on their own initiative they took the battle at Kolbuszova, suffering heavy losses.

After withdrawing from the San River, the company fell into the hands of the Boruta task force. The remnants of the company took their last battle near Oleshitsy together with the 21st infantry division. The division and the remnants of the company capitulated on September 16.

1st Light Tank Company of the Warsaw Defense Command (KOW).

Formed on September 4th as part of 11 double-turret 7TR tanks. The company had been in battle since September 8 near Warsaw.

On the 12th, the company took part in the attack on Okeiche, drove the Germans out of the airfield, and then ensured the withdrawal of its infantry. After suffering in this battle heavy losses, its remaining tanks were transferred to the 2nd KOV light tank company.

The 2nd company of KOV light tanks was formed on September 5th, consisting of 11 7TR tanks of the latest series. Went into battle on the 9th. On the 10th she supported a counterattack of her infantry on Wola (Warsaw area), and in the evening of the same day she destroyed and captured several German tanks. In the battle at Okecza on the 12th, the company suffered heavy losses. The combined detachment of both companies of the 18th lost many of their vehicles in a battle with German tanks. The last counterattack took place on September 26. During the surrender of Warsaw on September 27, only non-combat-ready vehicles fell into the hands of the Germans.


Broken light tank 7TR


Polish armored tires


PARTICIPATION OF ARMOR DIVISIONS IN COMBAT OPERATIONS

11th armored division.

Mobilized on August 25 for the Masovian Cavalry Brigade consisting of 13 TK-3 tankettes and eight armored vehicles mod. 1929. On the very first day of the war, the division was able to destroy a German patrol in armored vehicles. The next day, the armored division suffered heavy losses in a counterattack.

On September 4, he destroyed several German armored vehicles. When withdrawing from the Minsk Mazowiecki area on September 13, the division near Seroczyn took part in a battle with the advanced detachment of the Kempf tank brigade. The 62nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks took part in this battle, which later became part of the division.

The 14th division, together with tankers of the 1st tank battalion, provided the rear of the Lublin army. The remnants of the 1st Battalion were also attached to the division.

On September 16, the last armored vehicles had to be destroyed because they could not continue moving.

On September 18, in the battle of Tomashov-Lubelsky, the division's tankettes attacked German positions with heavy losses. The next day, all the group's slippers and wedges were lost.

21st armored division.

Mobilized on August 15 as part of 13 TKS tankettes and eight armored vehicles mod. 34-P for the Volyn Cavalry Brigade, which became part of the Lodz Army. He received his baptism of fire on September 1 in the battle of the brigade near Mokra. The division's losses were considerable. The next day, near the Islands, the division tried to hold back the advance of German tanks. On the 4th near Widawka, on the 6th south of Lodz and near Cyrusowa Wola, he lost almost all his vehicles in battles. On the 14th he was withdrawn to the rear to Lutsk, where a motorized reconnaissance detachment was assembled from its remnants. On September 18, personnel without combat vehicles crossed the border of Hungary.

31st armored division.

Mobilized on August 21 in the same composition as the 21st Division, it became part of the Suwalki Cavalry Brigade. On September 10, as part of a brigade near Csrvony Bor, he pushed the Germans back several kilometers. On the 11th, near Zambrovo, he suffered heavy losses. During the withdrawal, due to the lack of fuel, on September 15, all the vehicles had to be destroyed. The division's personnel on foot reached Volkovysk, where they surrendered to Soviet troops.

32nd armored division.

Mobilized on August 15, 1939 for the Podlaska Cavalry Brigade (13 TKS tankettes and eight armored vehicles model 34-I). The division took part in the battle on September 4, supporting the brigade’s attack on the territory of East Prussia in the Gelepburg area. The 8th-9th division supported the infantry in attempts to repel the Germans and occupy Mazowiecki Island. On the 11th a platoon of tankettes was lost at Zambrovs. On the 12th, near Chizhov, a German motorized patrol was repulsed at the cost of heavy losses. On the 13th, the division tried to break through to the bridge on the Men River, but was unsuccessful. The ford crossing led to large losses of equipment. The lack of fuel forced them to abandon their combat vehicles.

On September 20, the division's personnel took part in the defense of Grodno, and on September 24 moved to the territory of Lithuania.

33rd armored division.

Formed on August 25 for the Vilna Cavalry Brigade consisting of 13 TKS tankettes and eight armored vehicles mod. 34-P. At first he ensured the withdrawal of the cavalry brigade, and then went beyond the Vistula, having minor skirmishes with the enemy. On September 13 he arrived near Lublin and on the 15th he became part of the tank group of Major S. Mayevsky. On the 17th he ensured the withdrawal of W.B.P.-M. In the battles of Tomaszow-Lubelski on September 18, the division's tanks operated on the flank of the attacking Polish units, and armored vehicles guarded the rear. On September 19, supporting infantry attacks, tankettes reached the outskirts of the city. Deprived of fuel, they served as fixed firing points.

51st armored division.

Mobilized on August 25 of the Krakow Cavalry Brigade of the Krakow Army (13 TKS tankettes and eight armored vehicles model 34-11). From the very first day he carried out restraining actions and suffered significant losses from air attacks.

On September 3, he captured a German armored car and destroyed several more. Then he lost contact with the brigade and on the 5th entered into battle with the Germans, repelling captured Polish guns. On the 7th he became part of the operational group of General Skvarchinsky and on September 8, near Ilzha, caused significant losses to the enemy, but he himself suffered. The next day, while trying to break out of encirclement, I lost all my combat vehicles.

61st armored division.

Mobilized on August 28 for the Kresowa Cavalry Brigade of the Lodz Army. Composition: 13 TKS tankettes and eight armored vehicles mod. 34-II.

On September 4, his armored vehicles drove back enemy patrols, and on the 7th, near the village of Panashev, they unexpectedly attacked the headquarters of the German division. But then we had to abandon most of the armored vehicles due to lack of fuel. On the 11th, tankettes of the division carried out security near Radzyne and on the 21st, near Komorow, they had a battle with a German tank detachment. On the 22nd, during the counterattack of the 1st Infantry Division on Tarnavatka, the division suffered heavy losses. The division laid down its arms, but the division left and on September 25, at the crossing of the Wieprz River, it left its last vehicles.

62nd armored division.

Mobilized for the Podolsk Cavalry Brigade of the Poznan Army. The armament is the same as in the 61st division.

In the first phase of the battle on Bzura on September 9, the division supported the attack of the brigade, and the next day lost several combat vehicles in the battle of Wartkowice. On the 11th he took part in attacks in the Pazhsnchsva area. On September 16, in the battle of Kernozi, all the tankettes of the 2nd platoon were lost, and on the same day, when crossing the Bzura, both tankettes and armored vehicles had to be abandoned due to lack of fuel.

71st armored division.

Mobilized on August 25 for the Wielkopolska Cavalry Brigade of the Army "Poznan" and had 13 TK-3 (of which four with a 20-mm cannon) and eight armored vehicles mod. 1934.

In battle from September 1 - supported the cavalry brigade and infantry in the battles of Ravich and Kachkovo. The 2nd Division even invaded German territory in the Rawicz area. On the 7th the division held back the enemy's advance towards Łęczyca, and on the 9th its armored vehicles fought near Łowicz. 10th - an enemy column near Belyavi was defeated. On September 11th, a decisive and bold attack by tankettes allowed the artillery battery to be removed from the battle. An attempted counterattack on the 13th failed, but the division was successful the next day.

The armored vehicles had to be abandoned when crossing the Bzura, but the tankettes reached the Kampinovskaya Pushcha, and on the 18th, near Pochekha, several German combat vehicles were destroyed. On the 19th the last battle took place at Sierakow. On September 20, the only tankette of the division reached Warsaw.

81st armored division.

Mobilized on August 25 for the Pomeranian Cavalry Division of the Army “We will help. The armament is the same as in the 71st division.

On September 1, during an enemy attack on the brigade, the division counterattacked. Then, at the cost of heavy losses, he helped the brigade escape from encirclement. On September 5, the division was on patrol in the area of ​​​​the city of Torun. Due to the great wear and tear of the old tankettes and armored vehicles, the division had to be sent to the rear on the 7th. On the 13th in Lutsk, a mixed detachment was formed from serviceable vehicles, which on September 15, near Grubeshov, defeated a German patrol, capturing prisoners. On September 18, the detachment crossed the Hungarian border.

91st armored division.

Mobilized on March 25, 1939 for the Novogrudok Cavalry Brigade, which became part of the Modlin Army. Composition: 13 TK-3 tankettes, eight armored vehicles mod. 1934.

On September 3, together with the brigade, he took part in the attack at Dzyaldow, inflicting losses on the enemy. After the brigade's withdrawal, the division on the 12th participated in the attempt to eliminate the German bridgehead on the Vistula against Góra Kalwaria. On the 13th, the division's tankettes knocked out a German detachment from Sennitsa. During the retreat to Lublin, many combat vehicles were lost for technical reasons. On September 22, the division supported the attack of “its” brigade at Tomashov-Lyubelsky, losing several tankettes. On the same day, the remnants of the division joined the so-called armored motorized group.

On September 27, the division fought its last battle in the Sambir area. At the same time, the personnel were mostly captured by Soviet troops.


R35 tank of the Polish army


PARTICIPATION OF INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES AND SQUADRONS OF RECOVERY TANKS IN COMBAT OPERATIONS

11th reconnaissance tank company

mobilized 26 August 1939 for W.B.P.-M. consisting of 13 TKS tankettes (four of them with a 20-mm cannon). She joined the brigade on August 31 and both platoons, one at a time, were assigned to the brigade’s rifle regiments.

The company fought its first battle near Annopolsm on September 1 with heavy losses from German anti-tank gun fire. On September 18, it supported the infantry attack on Tomaszow-Lubelski. The remnants of the company capitulated with the brigade on September 20.

The 31st Separate Reconnaissance Tank Company (ORRT) was mobilized on August 25 and with its 13 TKS tankettes became part of the Poznań Army. On September 3, it was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division to ensure the division's withdrawal.

The first battle with the Germans took place near the city of Turek, where the company dispersed the German patrol, capturing prisoners. In the battle over Bzura on the 10th, near Soltsa, Malaya defeated a group of German sappers. On the 18th, in Pushcha Kampinosskaya, the company lost almost all of its vehicles in battle. The remaining tankettes arrived in Warsaw on September 20 and took part in its defense.

The 32nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25, 1939 (13 TKS tankettes) and was assigned to the Army of Lodz.

On September 5, she took part in an attempt to liquidate the German bridgehead on the Warta River, losing half of her vehicles. During the retreat on September 8, in a battle with the Germans, she lost several more tankettes. The remaining vehicles on September 11 became part of the 91st ORRT.

The 41st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25 (13 TK-3 tankettes) and was assigned to the Lodz Army.

In the ranks of the 30th Infantry Division, from the very first days she fought on the left bank of the Warta. On September 5, during a counterattack, she inflicted losses on the enemy. In the battles, Iodine Girardov lost almost all of her wedges on September 13. It was not possible to break out of the encirclement, and the company was captured.

The 42nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25, consisting of 13 TK-3 tankettes for the Lodz army. It was attached to the Kresova Cavalry Brigade and on September 4 supported its defense at the crossings of the Varga. After the battle of the 7th near Aleksandrowa Lodzki lost all of her vehicles except one, which was lost near Garwolin on September 11th.

The 51st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25, consisting of 13 TK-3 tankettes and became part of the Krakow army.

Already on September 1st she fought together with the 21st Infantry Division. On the 5th she fought in the Bochnia area with a German patrol. During the retreat, for technical reasons, she lost almost all of her wedges. On September 8, the remnants of the company became part of the 101st company from the 10th cavalry brigade.

The 52nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25 for the Krakow Army and was armed with 13 TK-3 tankettes.

Already on September 1, 1939, at Mikolov, the company repelled the German reconnaissance patrol. 2nd - supported the infantry counterattack. 3rd – attacked a group of German cyclists. On the 8th - she helped drive the Germans out of Papanov, which they occupied. On the 13th, the company suffered heavy losses in a battle with a German armored train near Koprzywnica. When crossing the Vistula on September 14, she lost her last tankettes. Personnel joined W.B.P.-M.

The 61st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 30, 1939 (13 TK-3 tankettes) for the Krakow army.

On September 3, the company supported a successful counterattack by the 1st Mountain Brigade. On September 4-6, the company was in battles between Raba and Stradomka. On the 7th, while supporting the counterattack at Radlov, it was scattered, losing a lot of equipment. On the 14th, heavy losses again in the Cheshanov area. On September 17, the remnants of the company joined the W.B.P.-M.

The 62nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 29 for the Modlin army as part of 13 TKS. Was assigned to the 20th Infantry Division. On September 2-4 she supported her counterattacks near Mlawa. Then, during the retreat, on the 13th she united with the 11th armored division and took part in the battle near Serochin. She finished her combat journey on September 20 together with W.B.P.-M. near Tomaszow-Lubelski.

The 63rd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 29, 1939 and, with its 13 TKS tankettes, was placed at the disposal of the Modlin Army.

Together with the 8th Infantry Division, she attacked the village of Shchspanki near Grudsk, then covered the withdrawal of the 21st Infantry Division to Modlin. 12th – reconnaissance raid in the Kazun region. Then she found herself surrounded by the Modlin fortress, where she capitulated on September 29.

The 71st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25 (13 TK-3 tankettes) for the Poznan army. This was the most “western” part of the Polish armored vehicles.

Already on September 1 in battle with German patrols. In the battle on Bzura it was subordinated to the 17th ID and on the 8th it lost several vehicles in an unsuccessful attack. On the 9th, her actions against the Germans were more successful (they even captured prisoners). The most successful day was the 10th, when in the Pentek area the company destroyed a German artillery battery. On September 15, the company repelled an attack by German tanks. But the next day it suffered heavy losses in people and equipment. And already without their wedges, her soldiers took part in the defense of Warsaw.

The 72nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25th, consisting of 13 TK-3 tankettes for the Poznan Army.

On September 4, together with the 26th Infantry Division, the company defended the crossing of the Notech River in the Nakly area. On the 16th, together with a combined group of tanks, she fought in the area of ​​the Braki estate. During the further retreat, she lost a lot of equipment, but still reached Warsaw and took part in its defense.

The 81st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25 (13 TK-3 tankettes) for the Help Army.

On September 2, her tankettes, although at the cost of heavy losses, ensured the local success of the Poles near Lake Melio. Then - the retreat and battle on the 16th at the Braki estate together with the 72nd ORRT. On September 18, having lost all equipment in the area of ​​lower Bzura, the company was captured.

The 82nd separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 25 (13 TK-3 tankettes) for the Poznan army. And on September 16 she took part in the battle near the Braki estate. On the 17th, attacked by enemy tanks, it was defeated and ceased to exist as a combat unit. The next day, due to lack of fuel, the remaining vehicles had to be destroyed.

The 91st separate company of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 26 for the Lodz Army, consisting of 13 TK-3 tankettes.

On the very first day of the war, in the sector of the 10th Infantry Division, the company scattered a German patrol, capturing prisoners and valuable documents. On September 5, the company took part in battles against the German bridgehead on the Warga River near Sieradz, on the 7th - at the crossing of the Hep River and on the 10th - against the German bridgehead on the Vistula. The company included the remnants of the 32nd ORRT and all together on September 13 became part of the reconnaissance tank company of the Warsaw Defense Command.

The 101st reconnaissance tank company was formed on September 13, 1939 for the 10th Cavalry Brigade, which became part of the Krakow Army. The company had 13 TK-3 tankettes, four of them armed with a 20-mm cannon.

The first battle was on September 2 at Yordanov. On the 6th, the company fought at Visnjic and covered the brigade's retreat. On the same day, the remnants of the 51st ORRT joined the company. The company had its greatest success on the 9th, when it repelled an enemy attack in the Rzeszow area. Then the battles of the 11th and 12th near Yavorov. On the 13th, the company was joined by the remnants of the brigade squadron of reconnaissance tanks. The last battles of the 10th Cavalry Brigade and 101st Company were fought on the 15th and 16th while trying to break through to Lvov. When the brigade crossed the Hungarian border on September 19, there were still four tankettes left in the horn.

Squadron of reconnaissance tanks (ERT) of the 10th Cavalry Brigade. Mobilized on 10 August 1939 as part of 13 TKF tankettes, four of which were armed with a 20 mm cannon.


Broken TKS wedge from the 10th Motorized Cavalry Brigade


The first battle with German armored units took place on September 5 in the Dobchits area. During the retreat, the squadron lost contact with its brigade, which it connected with only on September 13 near Zholkiev and became part of the 101st company of reconnaissance tanks.

A squadron of reconnaissance tanks was mobilized on August 26 for W.B.P.-M., having 13 TKS tankettes, four of them with a 20-mm cannon.

Since the beginning of the war, the squadron has been in patrol service. On September 8, he took part in an attack in the Solts area. In the battle near Lipsk he suffered heavy losses. On the 17th he fought with a German armored train near Sukhovolya. On September 18, its remnants became part of the 101st company.

A company of reconnaissance tanks of the Warsaw Defense Command was formed on September 3, consisting of 11 TK-3 tankettes.

In combat since September 7. On the 8th, Rashin suffered heavy losses. On the 13th it was replenished with the remnants of the 32nd and 91st ORRT. Defended Warsaw in the Wola region. The last battle took place on September 26 at the Warsaw Tovarnaya station. On September 27, the company capitulated along with the Warsaw garrison.

Maps and photos taken from the book “POLSKA BRON PANCERNA. 1939", Warszawa 1982