Patriarch Moskovsky and All Russia Alexy II was killed by three shots in the head (or did the skull of the ice ax?).
The Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexy II was killed. This stated and declares the famous Russian actor, TV presenter and public figure Stanislav Sadalsky.
"I am wildly: killed the Holy - and silent! I want to know the truth about how Alexia's earthly life ended in fact. Familiar priests, the police told me that the Patriarch was found with a head broken in three places that his gaze was directed at the door. Bewing in all the bells - no one seems to hear me. Many priests, people are undermine, began to be afraid publicly to communicate with me - the Security Service (Sat Church and the FSB) of the current Patriarch tracks their contacts, "the Sadalsky is indignant.
According to him, Kurayev responded the first - he recognized the blog that the Patriarchate "I was glad to say the unlapatic truth about the circumstances of the death of Alexy II."
"Dear Deacon, I appeal to you through the newspaper" Interlocutor ": explain to people that this is the truth. How did three holes formed in the head of the Holy Head? Why during the funeral face Alexy was closed? Lies, that according to the Orthodox tradition. When the Patriarch Tikhon was accompanied, nothing was hidden. Maybe because there was nothing to hide? "," Asks the actor.
Commenting on the reference of the Sadal Prododicacon recognizes "partly the right" version of the heart attack. "As such a heart attack would not kill the Patriarch," writes about. Andrei. "He just happened in the most uncomfortable for helping circumstances." At the same time, he admits: "It is possible that the attack was not at all. Just an elderly man with some turn or a sharp movement for a second lost the coordination of movements - and fell. But, falling, Zatilka hit the corner of the chair. And this angle interrupted Vienna".
Protodiankon Andrei Kuraev also reports that on the walls of the room in which the patriarch was at the time of death, "bloody traces of his hands" remained. The professor testifies that Alexy II himself created the conditions that prevented assistance to Him: "The case was in the inner fears of the Patriarch, which he hesked the key to the key for the night (and why did he shut down on the key, because his cubic never did not enter his blessing? Apparently He had something to fear ... - Ed.). Double doors, noise insulation from the rest of the building, where, fussing, the nuns are complete. Nobody heard moans. Nobody was heard. The keys from his chambers were not even in the protection. "
According to the version. Andrei, the doors of the patriarchals hacked only at 8.30, after which they found the body of Alexy II in the bathroom. Explaining the lack of a distinct official version of the death of Patriarch, Prododiakon lists possible bewilderment: "It is clear that the procurators have many questions. Why was there an alarming buttons in the bathroom? Why was the old man who was alone? Why was there no key keys? How could it be next to him Not soft and hard-hazard furniture? Why did the household nun not immediately reported the guard? It is clear that the Patriarchate was difficult to say that with death, the Primate met in the restroom. What would be quite usually for a simple person could be perceived as The scandal is applied to the Patriarch. Yes, and about- and intracereric splitters would be happy to have a joy of "death of Aria". In this regard, the version of the death of the patriarch as a result of an accident, actively spreading on his death, about. Andrey calls "Masching" .
From the editorial office of m3p. Firstly, any sensible person is clear that if you even allow the option of falling the patriarch, in which he hit the stool around the chair, then, unambiguously, it is incredible that at the same time he interrupted the vein and slaughter the skin of the skin so that the blood is "fountain" . Secondly, those who were in the Patriarch in the residence perfectly know about what gorgeous chairs stood in his cabinets. Take the head about them, falling the body - just unreal.
But the "political" argument of Sadalsky is that Alexy II could kill for the refusal to recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and to accept their dioceses into the ROC MP - not faithful.
The further from this tragic event, the reasons for the possible killing of Patriarch Alexy become the clearer. The fact is that he was on compromises with the leadership of Russia and participated in ecumenical meetings, etc. But he was not "locomotive" in these issues. They always had to push it. It is likely that at a certain point he, feeling the approach of death, simply refused the next betrayal of Christ. And it predicted his fate.
Being eyewitnesses of the appostasy in the ROC MP, which is actively initiated by the current Patriarch, you can talk with a lot of confidence that the death of Patriarch Alexy II is beneficial to ecumenistas-therapists in the Russian leadership, located under the direct patronage of the world government and some of the Russian ROC MP. In this matter, P. Cyril Rights, Patriarch Alexy, apparently, was "practically no longer-incapable to management" ( from outside).
Of course, if he was killed, then this crime could only do on the initiative and directions from the very "top", because People from the side to get to the territory guarded by the Federal Security Service (FSO, i.e. actually presidential) - could not under any circumstances.
When Kuraev began to tell that FSO staff had no keys from the Patriarch's chambers, allegedly, due to the fact that they did not want to move to him, then it was a smile. FSO is not the structure that is burdened with some emotions. It always clearly follows instructions.
Why could you kill using such inscinition? Hard to say. Perhaps the case is not tolerant. It would be quite difficult to poison it, because Food prepared people devotees to death.
Always virtuous about people think better than they eventhere is actually. Perhaps feeling the approach of death, the Patriarch wanted to bring repentance for his sins before God (ecumenism, etc., etc.), which could become publicity. This could serve as a signal for the enemies of Orthodoxy and Russiato its rapid elimination.
Anyway, god rest my soul of the deceased slave Yours Alexy and forgive him all the lack of liberal and involuntary and give him the kingdom of heaven!
Sadalsky posted a piece of speech from the "Word Shepherd" program, where Kirill (New Patriarch) responded to Alexia II.
This fragment was cut out from the ether. In it, Kirill reports about the sustainable death of the Patriarch and says that with his departure of Alexy "fenced our church from a difficult test, when a person is standing old and almost already incapable of management."
Here is this fragment (ed .m3r)
From the editorial office m3p- It is difficult to imagine that when the 95-year-old (!) Patriarch of Serbian Paul died (!) Patriarch, Serbs could say that in his address. Despite the fact that he was very old years and often sick, and all recent years in general "snowlessly located in the Military Medical Academy in Belgrade," all Orthodox Serbs were worried about him, as for his own father, considering it "of this righteous of our time "And the symbol of the spiritual unity of the Serbian people."
In addition, Patriarch Alexy was not a weak old man and did not suffer from senile dementia, so that Metropolitan Kirill could characterize it. He sick, like any elderly man, but even on the eve of his tragic death, he served as a festive liturgy introduction to the temple of the Most Holy Mother of God.
The fact of the cynicism of the Patriarch Kirill, who so responded by the 79-year-old charter of the Church, and now publishes the books in his memory and sings him the panelies.
This was stated by the famous Russian actor, TV presenter and public figure Stanislav Sadalsky, in an interview with the newspaper "Interlocutor".
"I am wildly: killed the Holy - and silent! I want to know the truth about how Alexia's earthly life ended in fact. Familiar priests, the police told me that the Patriarch was found with a head broken in three places that his gaze was directed at the door. Bewing in all the bells - no one seems to hear me. Many priests, people are undermine, began to be afraid to communicate with me - the Security Service of the current Patriarch tracks their contacts, "the Sadalsky is indignant.
According to him, the other day Kurayev responded first - acknowledged in the blog that the Patriarchate "I was glad to say the unlapatic truth about the circumstances of the death of Alexy II." "Dear Deacon, I appeal to you through the newspaper" Interlocutor ": explain to people that this is the truth. How did three holes formed in the head of the Holy Head? Why during the funeral face Alexy was closed? Lies, that according to the Orthodox tradition. When the Patriarch Tikhon was accompanied, nothing was hidden. Maybe because there was nothing to hide? "," Asks the actor.
Stas Sadalsky writes that he does not recognize Kirill. "The elections in the Church should be such as those, as a result of which I came to power, my friend, Bishop of Czech lands and Slovakia - Archimandrite Georgy (strange). They prepared three notes with the names of the applicants and dragged: "For whom God will send ..." And we do not have the election - the dramatization. I like the Clement, he is my neighbor, he is amazing. I would like him ... I watched him - he is a prayer room, a man without double morality. This priest. And Kirill me is disgusting. He speaks in Sevastopol that we are two fraternal people. It's right all, but I can't believe him, because he is already fighting since the death of Holy. "
Sadalsky reminds that he has posted a piece of speech from the program "Word of the Shepherd", where Kirill responded to Alexia's departure. This fragment was cut out from the ether. In it, Kirill reports about the sustainable death of the Patriarch and says that with his departure of Alexy "fenced our church from a difficult test, when a person is standing old and almost already incapable of management."
After the speech of Stas Sadalsky on his blog in LJ, there were circles on the water. The rumor that the death of His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II was "accelerated", rushing according to Russia with a speed of hearing.
ROC, although reluctant, but forced to disclose Alexy II death secrets.
Prododiankon Andrei Kuraev told the details of the Patriarch's death, thus responding to rumors about the violent death of His Holiness Patriarch.
The explanations of the Dyakon Andrei Kurayeva leave even more questions than the monstrous assumption of Sadalsky. For example, the visitors to the Kurayev blog rightly ask: "Why did the patriarch closed and the keys from his inner (!) There was no one who didn't have anyone? I see only one option (if I am not right, tell me another): I was afraid of the attempt. And this is actually him and his Killed (but, saved someone from the sin of murder, if this took place to live in the realities). "
Another blog visitor writes: "Yes, an unhealthy atmosphere of distrust there, judging by these keys, it was. The meaning of closing himself to the only key can be only one - the Patriarch did not trust the most closest. Holds to bad thoughts ..."
But even worse, that, hiding behind the eternal "ethical problem," which lies in the zone of the sorter and human shipments, the church is stripped. And this is a sin. Sin - everywhere. And here sin, and so sin.
We are confident that the ROC will come out of a difficult situation, referring to the Biblical Hama, who was likened by Stas Sadalsky. It was necessary to believe, not to notice, do not climb where they do not ask.
And in response: it was necessary to think, it was necessary to come up with a more truthful explanation of the joined head of the deceased Holy. Or was it necessary to say such a sad and uncomfortable truth?
Why did the Sadalsky "killed" the Patriarch Alexy?
Stas Sadalsky through the Komsomolsk press is noting a country that the Patriarch Alexy killed.
Well, okay, this type of press and created specifically for the drain of this kind of substances.
However, in a number of "arguments" of Sadalsky (and the level arguments - "I said familiar pricks") there is a mention of one particular source. This honor fell to me. Like, even Kuraev says that "the Patriarchate in vain on told the true circumstances of the death of Holiness."
Here, however, the Sadalsky has two inconsistencies.
First: I told this phrase after his first statement. And my phrase sounded like this: "I am afraid of saying the unlapatic truth about the circumstances of the death of the Holy, the Patriarchate received a vile rumor." Therefore, no matter how much my phrase was understood, but, being said in response to Sadalsky, she could not have a source or an argument in favor of the Sadalsky version.
The second nonstoves: I did not mean the murder of the Patriarch.
The official version was that a heart attack was the cause of death. Although in the first hours, there was even a non-church who came across the rumor about the car accident ("in the Moscow Patriarchate was denied the rumors that appeared that the cause of the death of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, Alexy II, had occurred on the eve of the car avaria," Ros. Newspaper 8 Dec 2008).
Partly the first is the first, completely incorrectly the second (although the reason for the appearance of such hearing is understood).
As such, the heart attack would not kill the patriarch. He just happened in the most uncomfortable circumstances for help.
It is possible that the attack was not at all. Just an elderly person with some turn or sharp movement for a second lost the coordination of movements - and fell. But, falling, the back of the stool hit the corner. And this angle interrupted Vienna. Patriarch came to consciousness. I tried to get up - on the walls bloody traces from his hands (this is important from a religious point of view: it means that the death of Patriarch was not instantaneous and he had time not only for the last struggle for life, but also to aware of the inevitability of the upcoming latter transition and prepare for it ).
Even with such an injury, it could be saved. If at least someone knew that he needed help. But the case was in the inner quit of the Patriarch, which he for the night himself from the inside locked the key. Double doors, noise insulation from the rest of the building, where, fussing, cotton down the nuns, complete. Nobody heard Patriarch's moans. The keys from his chambers were not even in guard.
Patriarch on the evening before the breakfast was ordered at 8 am. When and in half the ninth, he did not come out, began to worry. Knocks, calls did not give answers. Began to look into the windows (without much hope - the windows were not in all the patriarchs). And yet through the bathroom window (in order to look into it, I had to crawl into the edge of the roof) we saw it lying.
The door hacked. But the body has already cooled.
It is clear that the procurators have many questions. Why was there an alarming buttons in the bathroom, reaching even for a person lying on the floor? Why aged man was alone? Why was there no key keys? How could there be hijacked and hard-hazard furniture next to him? Why the housekeeper did not immediately report the security?
It is clear that the Patriarchate was difficult to say that with death, the Primate met in the restroom. What would be quite usually for a simple person could be perceived as a scandal for use in Patriarch. Yes, and about- and intra-church splitters would be happy to surrender about the "death of Aria".
Therefore, first (taking into account the injury of the head) and there was a camouflage version of autoavaria (it is unlikely that this gossip arose in Patriarchate - Rather among journalists who learned the first details of the tragedy).
But nobody gossipped about the murder.
And even more so wildly the version of Sadalsky, as if the Patriarch was killed for the fact that he did not support the Kremlin in the days of the Ossetian Georgian August war.
Political killings should be the signs and are understandable - whom and for that, so that others have no way.
Suppose that Sadalsky is right, and someone (Ossetian superhbores or the Kremlin agents) killed the patriarch just for that. But is the position of the new Patriarch Kirill on this issue in something different from the position of Patriarch Alexy? All the same Moscow Patriarchate emphasizes that South Ossetia and Abkhazia, it considers from the point of view of church law - that is, as the canonical part of the Georgian Orthodox Church. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that church borders and states are not obliged to coincide, and the recognition of the Moscow Patriarchate of the jurisdiction of church Tbilisi over these diocesses does not mean our disagreement with the sovereignty of Abkhazia and South Ossetia or with the recognition of this sovereignty of Russia.
In detail about this, I wrote just on the eve of the death of Patriarch Alexy - "Abkhaz Knot of Church Policy" (Profile No. 47, 15 Dec 2008). And quite a pro-creek magazine placed this article shortly after the unexpected death of the Primate.
Yes, and at the Patriarch Alexia, the production of foreign workers was carried out by Met. Kirill. So it was already quite strange for the Kremlin: for the "mistake" in the externalist politics to remove the Patriarch Alexy and instead to allow the election of the author of this "error".
As for the covered face of the rebel, this is a church tradition. Those who wish can watch the 6th issue of JMM for 1970 - the face of Patriarch Alexy First is openly only on the first memorial in his house. Then it is closed on the general terroric funeral.
"Following the initial monks" speaks of Skimnikov's burial: "There is a Velikago's image, having fallen over the chapter over the head, and shine and even before the brother, I am not video of the face of its relics" (Cessist Monastic M., 2003, SS. 135-136). "The face of the deceased bishop and the priest is covered with air, which is not removed and during the burial" (Bulgakov S. V. Desktop book for sacred-paroles.., 1993, (reprint from 1913) p. 1290).
Only one thing testifies to his cry on this occasion: he is so unfambled that he did not have a single priest on the burial.
I will not prescribe moralite. Just do not confuse two things: the end of the charter of the Church always has a political echo. But the death of the patriarch does not always have a consequence of politicians.
Farewell to Holy Piece See:
The famous publicist Prododiakon Andrei Kuraev, close to Patriarchy Vercham, about true, as he assures, the circumstances of the death of the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Alexy II (Ridigra).
As you know, according to the official version, the Primate of the ROC died of a heart attack, but the medical conclusion about death was not published, as no details were reported on the last hours of life of the Patriarch. This contributed to the emergence of various rumors and versions, up to the version of the murder for political purposes, with which the famous Russian actor, TV presenter and public figure Stanislav Sadalsky spoke in an interview with the newspaper "Interlocutor. This version has recently been widely converted into the media.
Prododiankon Andrei Kuraev acknowledged that the details of the death of Patriarch Alexy II was deliberately silent because of their "non-residents", although the official version is still closer to the truth than others. Next, Andrei Kuraev reports:
"As such a heart attack would not kill the patriarch. He just happened in the most uncomfortable for helping circumstances.
It is possible that the attack was not at all. Just an elderly person with some turn or sharp movement for a second lost the coordination of movements - and fell. But, falling, the back of the stool hit the corner. And this angle interrupted Vienna. Patriarch came to consciousness. I tried to get up (on the walls bloody traces from his hands).
Even with such an injury, it could be saved. If at least someone knew that he needed help. But the case was in the inner quit of the Patriarch, which he for the night himself from the inside locked the key. Double doors, noise insulation from the rest of the building, where, fussing, cotton down the nuns, complete. Nobody heard Patriarch's moans. The keys from his chambers were not even in guard.
Patriarch on the evening before the breakfast was ordered at 8 am. When and in half the ninth, he did not come out, began to worry. Knocks, calls did not give answers. Began to look into the windows. And through the bathroom window saw it lying.
The door hacked. But the body has already cooled.
It is clear that the procurators have many questions. Why was there an alarming button in the bathroom? Why aged man was alone? Why was there no key keys? How could there be hijacked and hard-hazard furniture next to him? Why the housekeeper did not immediately report the security.
It is clear that the Patriarchate was difficult to say that with death, the Primate met in the restroom. What would be quite usually for a simple person could be perceived as a scandal for use in Patriarch. Yes, and about- and intra-church splitters would be happy to surrender about the "death of Aria".
Therefore, first (taking into account the injury of the head) and there was a camouflage version of autoavaria. "
In the comments to Kurayev's post, many pay attention to the fact that such a strange self-insulation of the elderly and a sick person, who could at any time need help, most likely caused by anything other than fear and distrust to the nearest surrounding and personal security.
Also pay for an amazing coincidence of the death circumstances of Patriarch Alexy II with a history of death in 1970. Patriarch with the same name Alexy I (Simansky), who deceased by the official version of "heart failure". According to one of the commentators in the protodiacon blog Andrei Kuraeva, "In the evening, in my residence, I was in the bathroom, carrying a basin in my hands (for some reason, this evening was not his old servant Danil Ostapova), stumbled, fell and hit. He died, right, not immediately, but after a few months, but After this, the cases did not get down and did not get up (it was a lot of years - 91). "
Stas Sadalsky revealed the Pandora Box. The mysterious death of the patriarch, which occurred allegedly in the toilet and therefore did not find a truthful official explanation
enveloped with rumors and gossip. Deacon Kuraev, who was forced to refute the rumor about the murder of Patriarch in three shots in the head, wriggled even more horror. It turns out that the Patriarch, being in the bathroom, shouted the temple about the joint, was interrupted by temporal Vienna, he moaned, but did not receive help, because he himself was stuck overnight in his rest, not leaving anyone a key. Apparently, afraid of the attempt ...
This was stated by the famous Russian actor, TV presenter and public figure Stanislav Sadalsky, in an interview with the newspaper "Interlocutor"
.
« I am wildly: killed the Holy - and silent! I
i want to know the truth about how Alexia's earthly life actually ended.
Familiar priests, the police told me that the Patriarch was found with a head broken in three places that his gaze was directed at the door. Bewing in all the bells - no one seems to hear me. Many priests, people, people, began to be afraid publicly to communicate with me - the Security Service of the current patriarch tracks their contacts "- Indoor Sadalsky.
According to him, the other day Kurayev responded first - acknowledged in the blog that the Patriarchate "I was glad to say the unlapatic truth about the circumstances of the death of Alexy II." "Dear Deacon, I appeal to you through the newspaper" Interlocutor ": explain to people that this is the truth. How did three holes formed in the head of the Holy Head? Why during the funeral face Alexy was closed? Lies, that according to the Orthodox tradition. When the Patriarch Tikhon was accompanied, nothing was hidden. Maybe because there was nothing to hide? "," Asks the actor.
Stas Sadalsky writes that he does not recognize Kirill. " Church elections should be such as those, as a result of which I came to power, my friend, bishop of Czech lands and Slovakia - Archimandrite Georgy (strange). They prepared three notes with the names of the applicants and dragged: "For whom God will send ..." And we do not have the election - the dramatization. I like the Clement, he is my neighbor, he is amazing. I would like him ... I watched him - he is a prayer room, a man without double morality. This priest. And Kirill me is disgusting. He speaks in Sevastopol that we are two fraternal people. It's right all, but I can't believe him, because he is already fighting since the death of Holy».
Sadalsky reminds that he has posted a piece of speech from the program "Word of the Shepherd", where Kirill responded to Alexia's departure. This fragment was cut out from the ether. In it, Kirill reports about the sustainable death of the Patriarch and says that with his departure of Alexy "fenced our church from a difficult test, when a person is standing old and almost already incapable of management."
After the speech of Stas Sadalsky on his blog in LJ, there were circles on the water. The rumor that the death of His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II was "accelerated", rushing according to Russia with a speed of hearing.
ROC, although reluctant, but forced to disclose Alexy II death secrets.
Prododiankon Andrei Kuraev told the details of the Patriarch's death, thus responding to rumors about the violent death of His Holiness Patriarch.
As reported father Andrey in his blog "As such a heart attack, I would not kill the patriarch. He just happened in the most uncomfortable circumstances for help. "
Why did the Sadalsky "killed" the Patriarch Alexy?
Stas Sadalsky through the Komsomolsk press is noting a country that the Patriarch Alexy killed.
Well, okay, this type of press and created specifically for the drain of this kind of substances.
However, in a number of "arguments" of Sadalsky (and the level arguments - "I said familiar pricks") there is a mention of one particular source. This honor fell to me. Like, even Kuraev says that "the Patriarchate did not speak in vainly told the true circumstances of the death of Holiness."
Here, however, the Sadalsky has two inconsistencies.
First: I told this phrase after his first statement. And my phrase sounded like this: "I am afraid of saying the unlapatic truth about the circumstances of the death of the Holy, the Patriarchate received a vile rumor." Therefore, no matter how much my phrase was understood, but, being said in response to Sadalsky, she could not have a source or an argument in favor of the Sadalsky version.
The second nonstoves: I did not mean the murder of the Patriarch.
The official version was that a heart attack was the cause of death. Although in the first hours there was a hearing even about the car accident.
Partly the first first, completely incorrectly the second (although the reason for the appearance of such hearing is understood).
As such, the heart attack would not kill the patriarch. He just happened in the most uncomfortable circumstances for help.
It is possible that the attack was not at all. Just an elderly person with some turn or sharp movement for a second lost the coordination of movements - and fell. But, falling, the back of the stool hit the corner. And this angle interrupted Vienna. Patriarch came to consciousness. I tried to get up - on the walls bloody traces from his hands (this is important from a religious point of view: it means that the death of Patriarch was not instantaneous and he had time not only for the last struggle for life, but also to aware of the inevitability of the upcoming latter transition and prepare for it ).
Even with such an injury, it could be saved. If at least someone knew that he needed help. But the case was in the inner quit of the Patriarch, which he for the night himself from the inside locked the key. Double doors, noise insulation from the rest of the building, where, fussing, cotton down the nuns, complete. Nobody heard Patriarch's moans. The keys from his chambers were not even in guard.
Patriarch on the evening before the breakfast was ordered at 8 am. When and in half the ninth, he did not come out, began to worry. Knocks, calls did not give answers. Began to look into the windows. And through the bathroom window saw it lying.
The door hacked. But the body has already cooled.
It is clear that the procurators have many questions. Why was there an alarming button in the bathroom? Why aged man was alone? Why was there no key keys? How could there be hijacked and hard-hazard furniture next to him? Why the housekeeper did not immediately report the security?
It is clear that the Patriarchate was difficult to say that with death, the Primate met in the restroom. What would be quite usually for a simple person could be perceived as a scandal for use in Patriarch. Yes, and about- and intra-church splitters would be happy to surrender about the "death of Aria".
Therefore, first (taking into account the injury of the head) and there was a camouflage version of autoavaria.
But nobody gossipped about the murder.
And even more so wildly the version of Sadalsky, as if the Patriarch was killed for the fact that he did not support the Kremlin in the days of the Ossetian Georgian August war.
Political killings should be the signs and are understandable - whom and for that, so that others have no way.
Suppose that Sadalsky is right, and someone (Ossetian superhbores or the Kremlin agents) killed the patriarch just for that. But is the position of the new Patriarch Kirill on this issue in something different from the position of Patriarch Alexy? All the same Moscow Patriarchate emphasizes that South Ossetia and Abkhazia, it considers from the point of view of church law - that is, as the canonical part of the Georgian Orthodox Church. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that church borders and states are not obliged to coincide, and the recognition of the Moscow Patriarchate of the jurisdiction of church Tbilisi over these diocesses does not mean our disagreement with the sovereignty of Abkhazia and South Ossetia or with the recognition of this sovereignty of Russia.
In detail about this, I wrote just on the eve of the death of Patriarch Alexy - "Abkhaz Knot of Church Policy" (Profile No. 47, 15 Dec 2008). And quite a pro-creek magazine placed this article shortly after the unexpected death of the Primate.
Yes, and at the Patriarch Alexia, the production of foreign workers was carried out by Met. Kirill. So it was already quite strange for the Kremlin: for the "mistake" in the externalist politics to remove the Patriarch Alexy and instead to allow the election of the author of this "error".
I will not prescribe moralite. Just do not confuse two things: the end of the charter of the Church always has a political echo. But the death of the patriarch does not always have a consequence of politicians.
The explanations of the Dyakon Andrei Kurayeva leave even more questions than the monstrous assumption of Sadalsky. For example, the visitors to the Kurayev blog rightly ask: "Why did the patriarch closed and the keys from his inner (!) There was no one who didn't have anyone? I see only one option (if I am not right, tell me another): I was afraid of the attempt. And this is actually him and his Killed (but, saved someone from the sin of murder, if this took place to live in the realities). "
Another blog visitor writes: "Yes, an unhealthy atmosphere of distrust there, judging by these keys, it was. The meaning of closing himself to the only key can be only one - the Patriarch did not trust the most closest. Holds to bad thoughts ..."
But even worse, that, hiding behind the eternal "ethical problem," which lies in the zone of the sorter and human shipments, the church is stripped. And this is a sin. Sin - everywhere. And here sin, and so sin.
We are confident that the ROC will come out of a difficult situation, referring to the Biblical Hama, who was likened by Stas Sadalsky. It was necessary to believe, not to notice, do not climb where they do not ask.
And in response: it was necessary to think, it was necessary to come up with a more truthful explanation of the joined head of the deceased Holy. Or was it necessary to say such a sad and uncomfortable truth?
Loading...
