1967
Diana's parents divorced. Diana initially lived with her mother, and then her father sued and received custody.
1969
Diana's mother married Peter Shand Kydd.
1970
After being educated by teachers, Diana was sent to Riddlesworth Hall, Norfolk, a boarding school
1972
Diana's father began a relationship with Raine Legge, Countess of Dartmouth, whose mother was Barbara Cartland, a novelist
1973
Diana began her education at West Heath Girls School in Kent, an exclusive boarding school for girls.
1974
Diana moved to the Spencer family estate in Althorp
1975
Diana's father inherited the title of Earl Spencer, and Diana received the title of Lady Diana
1976
Diana's father married Raine Legge
1977
Diana left West Girls Heath School; her father sent her to the Swiss physical education school, Chateau d'Oex, but she only studied there for a few months
1977
Prince Charles and Diana met in November when he was dating her sister, Lady Sarah. Diana taught him to dance
1979
Diana moved to London, where she worked as a housekeeper, nanny and assistant kindergarten teacher; she lived with three other girls in a three-room apartment bought by her father
1980
While visiting her sister Jane, who was married to Robert Fellows, the Queen's assistant secretary, Diana and Charles met again; Charles soon asked Diana on a date, and in November he introduced her to severalmembers of the royal family: queen, queen mother and the Duke of Edinburgh (his mother, grandmother and father)
Prince Charles proposed to Lady Diana Spencer during dinner at Buckingham Palace
Lady Diana went on a previously planned holiday in Australia
Wedding of Lady Diana Spencer and Charles, Prince of Wales, in St. Paul's Cathedral; television broadcast
October 1981
The Prince and Princess of Wales visit Wales
Official announcement that Diana is pregnant
Prince William (William Arthur Philip Louis) born
Prince Harry (Henry Charles Albert David) born
1986
Disagreements in the marriage became obvious to the public, Diana begins a relationship with James Hewitt
Diana's father died
Publication of Morton's bookDiana: Her True Story" , including the story of Charles's long affair withCamilla Parker Bowlesand allegations of five suicide attempts, including sometime during Diana's first pregnancy; It was later revealed that Diana, or at least her family, collaborated with the author; her father contributed many family photographs
Official announcement of the legal separation of Diana and Charles
Announcement from Diana that she is retiring from public life
1994
Prince Charles, interviewed by Jonathan Dimbleby, admitted that he had been in a relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles since 1986 (later revealed to have started earlier) - to a British television audience of 14 million.
Martin Bashir's BBC interview with Princess Diana was watched by 21.1 million viewers in Britain. Diana talked about her struggles with depression, bulimia and self-deprecation. In this interview, Diana said her famous line: "Well, there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded," referring to her husband's relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles
Buckingham Palace announced that the Queen had written to the Prince and Princess of Wales, with the support of the Prime Minister and a secret lawyer, advising them to get a divorce.
Princess Diana said she agreed to divorce
July 1996
Diana and Charles agreed to divorce
Divorce of Diana, Princess of Wales and Charles, Prince of Wales. Diana received approximately $23 million plus $600,000 per year, retained the title "Princess of Wales" but not the title "Her Royal Highness" and continued to live at Kensington Palace; the agreement was that both parents were to be actively involved in their children's lives
Late 1996
Diana became involved in the problem of landmines
1997
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines, with which Diana worked, has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Christie's in New York auctioned 79 of Diana's evening dresses; Proceeds of approximately $3.5 million went to cancer and AIDS charities.
1997
Romantic relationship with 42-year-old Dodi Al-Fayed, whose father Mohammed Al-Fayed was the owner of Harrod's department store and the Ritz Hotel in Paris.
Diana, Princess of Wales, died from injuries sustained in a car accident in Paris, France
Princess Diana's funeral. She was buried on an island in the middle of the lake on the Spencer estate in Althorp.
The tragedy occurred on August 31, 1997, when the car in which Princess Diana was traveling, under mysterious circumstances, crashed into the 13th column of the tunnel under the Alma Bridge. Then everything was attributed to the driver being drunk and an unfortunate coincidence of circumstances. Was this really so? A few years later, a list of facts appears that can take a different look at the “accident” on that fateful day.
A surprise for many was the letter from Princess Diana herself, written by her 10 months before her own death, which was published in 2003 by the English newspaper “Daily Mirror”. Even then, in 1996, the princess was worried that her life was in the “most dangerous phase” and someone (the newspaper’s name was hidden) wanted to eliminate Diana by setting up a car accident. Such a turn of events would have paved the way for her ex-husband, Prince Charles, to remarry. According to Diana, for 15 years she was “harassed, terrorized and mentally tortured by the British system.” “I cried all this time as much as no one in the world cried, but my inner strength did not allow me to give up.” The princess felt something was wrong, as many people sense the approach of trouble, but did she really know about the impending assassination attempt? Was there really a conspiracy against Lady Di?
One of the first to suggest such a development of events was billionaire Mohammed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Al-Fayed, who died along with Diana. However, the French special services, which investigated the circumstances of the car accident, concluded that the princess’s Mercedes with driver Henri Paul collided in the tunnel with the Fiat of one of the paparazzi while trying to overtake. Wanting to avoid a collision, Paul drove the car to the side and crashed into the ill-fated 13th column. From that very moment, questions began to arise to which there are still no clear answers.
According to Mohamed Al-Fayed, the driver Henri Paul was indeed involved in the accident, but not quite as the official version says. The billionaire claims that the presence of a large amount of alcohol in the driver’s blood is the machinations of doctors who are also involved in this case. In addition, according to Mohammed’s words, Paul was an informant for the British intelligence service M6. It also seems strange that paparazzi James Andanson, the driver of the Fiat Uno that Diana’s Mercedes collided with, died in 2000 under very strange circumstances: his body was found in a burned-out car in the forest. The police considered it a suicide, but Al-Fayed thinks differently.
Another interesting fact is that a few weeks after the photographer’s death, the agency where he worked was attacked. The armed men took the workers hostage and fled only after they had taken out all the photographic materials and equipment. It later became known that the day after the accident, a photographer from the same agency, Lionel Cherrault, was left in the tunnel without equipment and materials. The police tried by all means to cover up this case, which, in principle, they succeeded in doing.
It also seems strange that the cameras monitoring the route from the Ritz Hotel, where Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed lived, to the exit from the tunnel around the clock, were for some reason turned off during the passage of the Mercedes.
Richard Tomlinson, an officer of the British intelligence service M6, shared interesting information regarding this case under oath. For example, that immediately before the death of the princess, two M6 special agents arrived in Paris, and in the Ritz hotel itself, M6 had its own informant. Tomlinson is confident that this informant was none other than the driver Henri Paul. Maybe that’s why the driver had two thousand pounds sterling in cash and one hundred thousand in his bank account at the time of the accident, with a salary of 23 thousand a year.
The official version of the driver’s intoxication is more than shaky, largely relying on indirect and inaccurate evidence. For example, after the accident, the driver's body lay in the sun for a long time in very hot weather instead of being placed in the refrigerator. In the heat, the blood “fermented” quite quickly, after which it was not possible to distinguish the alcohol consumed from the alcohol produced as a result of changes in the body. The second “irrefutable evidence” of the driver’s alcoholism is that he was taking the drug tiapride, which is often prescribed to alcoholics. However, tiapride is also used as a sleeping pill and sedative. It was precisely the calming effect that Henri Paul could have sought after a break with his family!
When the driver was autopsied, no signs of alcoholism were found in his liver, and just before the crash, Paul underwent a full medical examination to renew his pilot's license. However, Mohammed Al-Fayed's sources claim that before the accident, carbon monoxide was found in Henri Paul's blood, which can throw a person out of balance in life. How did it get into the driver’s body and, most importantly, who benefited from it? Surely the French intelligence services know something about this issue, but so far they are in no hurry to share information.
A bright flashing light, described by several witnesses, may have helped the tragedy unfold. Brenda Wills and Françoise Levistre have been talking about this for a long time, talking about a bright strobe light in the tunnel under the Alma bridge. No one took the words of the two women seriously (or wanted to accept them), despite the mention of these facts in authoritative periodicals. On the contrary, the witnesses, especially the Frenchwoman Levistre, were advised to be locked up in a psychiatric hospital.
The mention of the flashing light during the accident struck British intelligence officer Richard Tomlinson because he had access to secret M6 documents relating to the Milosevic affair. One of these documents outlined a plan to assassinate the Yugoslav leader: staging a car accident using bright flashing lights. (You can read about the effects of light under certain conditions in the article “Measuring.”)
Why were there no surveillance cameras in the tunnel, although no problems were noticed at the Ritz Hotel itself? Of course, this can be attributed to an accident or misunderstanding. But what really happened? We may never be able to reconstruct the full picture of the events, although there is hope for an investigation by the French intelligence services. Will they share information with the common people?
Princess Diana. Last day in Paris
A film about the last weeks of the life of one of the most famous women of the twentieth century - Diana, Princess of Wales. Diana's unexpected and tragic death in August 1997 shocked the world no less than the assassination of President Kennedy. From the very beginning, the tragedy that happened on August 31, 1997 was surrounded by many conflicting rumors and the most incredible assumptions.
Who killed Princess Diana?
Ten years ago, the worst car accident of the last century occurred. The legendary Lady Di, an English princess, a female symbol, died in a Paris tunnel (See the photo gallery “The Life Story of Princess Diana”). On August 27 and 28, the REN TV channel will show the documentary film “A Purely English Murder.” The authors conducted their own investigation and tried to find out whether this tragedy was an accident.
On August 31, 1997, at 0:27 a.m., the car containing Princess Diana, her friend Dodi al-Fayed, driver Henri Paul and Diana's bodyguard Trevor Rhys-Jones crashes into the 13th pillar of the bridge over the Alma tunnel. Dodi and driver Henri Paul die on the spot. Princess Diana will die at about 4 a.m. in hospital.
Version 1 Paparazzi killers?
The first version expressed by the investigation: several reporters who were riding scooters were to blame for the accident. They were chasing Diana's black Mercedes, and one of them may have interfered with the princess's car. The Mercedes driver, trying to avoid a collision, crashed into a concrete bridge support.
But, according to eyewitnesses, they entered the tunnel a few seconds after Diana’s Mercedes, which means they could not have caused the accident.
Lawyer Virginie Bardet:
— In fact, there is no evidence of the photographers’ guilt. The judge said: "There is no evidence of manslaughter in the actions of the photographers which led to the deaths of Diana, Dodi al-Fayed, Henri Paul and the incapacitation of Trevor Rhys-Jones."
Version 2 Mysterious “Fiat Uno”
The investigation puts forward a new version: the cause of the accident was a car, which by that time was already in the tunnel. In the immediate vicinity of the crashed Mercedes, detective police discovered fragments of a Fiat Uno.
Jacques Mules, head of the detective police team: “The fragments of the rear light and paint particles that we discovered allowed us to calculate all the characteristics of the Fiat Uno within 48 hours.”
When interviewing eyewitnesses, police allegedly found out that a white Fiat Uno zigzagged out of the tunnel a few seconds after the accident. Moreover, the driver looked not at the road, but in the rearview mirror, as if he saw something, for example, a crashed car.
The detective police determined the exact characteristics of the car, its color and year of manufacture. But even with information about the car and a description of the driver’s appearance, the investigation was unable to find either the car or the driver.
Francis Gillery, author of his own independent investigation: “All cars of this brand in the country were checked, but none of them showed signs of a similar collision. The white Fiat Uno disappeared into the ground! And the eyewitnesses of the accident who saw him began to get confused in the testimony, from which it was not clear whether the white Fiat was at the scene of the tragedy at the ill-fated moment.”
It is interesting that the version about the white Fiat that allegedly caused the accident, as well as the information about the left turn signal found at the scene of the tragedy, was not made public immediately, but only two weeks after the incident.
Version 3British intelligence services
Only today are details becoming known that for some reason it was customary not to mention. As soon as a black Mercedes entered the tunnel, a bright flash of light suddenly cut through the twilight. It is so strong that everyone who observed it was blinded for a few seconds. And a moment later, the silence of the night is shattered by the squeal of brakes and the sound of a terrible impact. François Laviste was just leaving the tunnel at that time and was only a few meters from the scene of the tragedy. At first, the investigation accepted his testimony, and then recognized the only witness as unreliable.
The version spread at the suggestion of former MI6 employee Richard Thomplison. The former agent said that the circumstances of the death of Princess Diana remind him of the plan to assassinate Slobodan Milosevic, developed by the British intelligence services. The Yugoslav president was going to be blinded in the tunnel by a powerful flash.
The police are reluctant to include mention of the flash of light in the protocols. Eyewitnesses are nervous and insist on the veracity of their testimony. And a few months later, British and French newspapers published a sensational statement by former British intelligence agent Richard Tomplison that the latest laser weapons, which are in service with the intelligence services, may have been used in the Alma tunnel.
Fiat Uno is back on stage
But how could fragments of a car that would never be found appear at the scene of the incident? The media version is that the fragments of the Fiat were planted by those who prepared this accident in advance and wanted to disguise it as a regular accident. The press insists that these are British intelligence services.
The intelligence services knew that the white Fiat would definitely be next to Princess Diana's car that night. It was in the white Fiat that one of the most famous and successful paparazzi in Paris, James Andanson, drove. He couldn’t miss such an opportunity to make money from photographs of a celebrity couple that everyone was interested in...
The media suggested that the services simply could not prove the involvement of the photographer and his car in the accident, although they really hoped. Andanson was indeed in the tunnel that night. True, according to some of his colleagues who were at the Ritz Hotel on the evening of August 30, 1997, this was a rare case when the photographer arrived at work without a car. And perhaps that is why the version developed by someone about Andanson’s guilt in the accident lost its central link even before Dodi and Diana left the hotel. On the other hand, Andanson could indeed have been involved in the accident. He repeatedly came to the attention of the al-Fayed family's security service, and for them, of course, it was no secret that Andersen was not only a successful photographer. Al-Fayed's security service allegedly managed to obtain evidence that the photographer was an agent of the British intelligence service. But Dodi’s father, for some reason, now does not consider it necessary to present them to the investigation. James Andanson was not a random figure in this tragedy.
Andanson was seen in the tunnel, and he was indeed one of the first there. They also saw a car at the scene of the tragedy that was very similar to his car, albeit with different license plates, possibly fake.
But then questions begin to which there is no answer. Why did the photographer, who spent several hours at the Ritz Hotel for the sake of a sensational photo, suddenly not waiting for Diana with Dodi al-Fayed, for no apparent reason left his post and went straight to the tunnel. After the accident, Andanson, without even waiting for the outcome, when a crowd just began to gather in the tunnel, suddenly disappears. Literally in the middle of the night - at 4 o'clock in the morning - he flies from Paris on the next flight to Corsica.
Some time later, in the French Pyrenees, his body will be found in a burnt car. While the police are establishing the identity of the deceased, unknown persons steal all the papers, photographs and computer disks related to the death of Princess Diana from the office of his Parisian photo agency.
If this is not a fatal coincidence, then Andanson was eliminated either as an unwanted witness or as the perpetrator of the murder.
In September 1999, another reporter, who was next to a mangled black Mercedes that ill-fated night, died in a Paris hospital. Reporter James Keith was preparing for minor knee surgery but told friends: "I have a feeling I won't be coming back." After being discharged from the hospital, the reporter was going to publish documents about the causes of the accident on the Alma Bridge, but within a few hours after his death, the Internet web page with details of the investigations and all materials were destroyed.
Who turned off the cameras?
The police officers working at the scene decide to include the recordings of road surveillance cameras in the case. It is from them that one can determine exactly how the accident occurred and how many cars were in the tunnel at the time of the collision. The road service workers who were called do not understand why there is such a rush, and only wonder why the films cannot be viewed tomorrow morning. But when they open the boxes in which the video cameras are mounted, they are even more surprised. The video surveillance system, which works properly in all other points of Paris, by a strange coincidence, it was in the Alma tunnel that failed. One can only guess who or what caused this.
Version 4 Drunk driver
On July 5, 1999, almost two years later, newspapers from all over the world published a sensational statement from the investigation: the main blame for what happened in the Alma tunnel lies with the Mercedes driver Henri Paul. He was the chief of security at the Ritz Hotel and also died in this disaster. Investigators accuse him of driving drunk.
Michael Cowel, al-Fayed's official spokesman: “It was officially announced that he was driving the car at a speed of 180 km/h. Very fast. Now in the file it is written in small print: “The accident occurred at a speed of 60 (!) kilometers per hour.” Not 180 km/h, but 60!”
The statement that the driver was drunk sounded like a bolt from the blue. To prove or disprove this, you just need to take the deceased’s blood for analysis. However, it is this simple operation that will turn into a real detective story.
Jacques Mules, who was the first representative of the investigative authorities to arrive at the scene of the tragedy, said that a blood test showed the true state of affairs, which means that Henri Paul was indeed very drunk.
Jacques Mules, head of the detective police brigade: “Before leaving the Ritz, Princess Diana and Dodi al-Fayed were nervous. But the main thing that indicates an accident is the presence of alcohol - 1.78 ppm in the blood of the driver, Mr. Henri Paul. In addition, he was taking antidepressants, which also affected his driving behavior.”
Michael Cowel, al-Fayed's official spokesman: “The filming proves that Henri Paul behaved adequately in the hotel that evening, he talks to Dodi at such a distance, he talks to Diana. If even the slightest signs of intoxication had been revealed, Dodi, and he was very picky in this regard, would not have gone anywhere. He would have fired him altogether.”
To have that much alcohol in his blood, Henri Paul had to drink about 10 glasses of wine. Such intoxication could not have been overlooked by the photographers located near the hotel, but none of them indicated this in their testimony.
The examination data, indicating a state of severe intoxication, were ready within 24 hours after the autopsy. But this was officially announced only two years later. For 24 months, the investigation worked on the obviously weaker version of the guilt of the paparazzi or the presence of the Fiat Uno. And two years later, it’s unlikely that anyone who saw the hotel’s security chief, Henri Paul, that evening would be able to say with certainty whether he was completely sober.
A day after the accident, toxicology experts Gilbert Pépin and Dominique Lecomte had just completed a blood test on Henri Paul. The test tubes are placed first in a box and then in a refrigerator. The results are recorded in the protocol. According to what is written, the driver can be considered not just a little drunk, but simply drunk... But the numbers written in the column below are even more surprising: the level of carbon monoxide is 20.7%. If this is actually the case, the driver simply would not be able to stand on his feet, let alone drive the car. Only a person who committed suicide by inhaling gases from a car exhaust pipe could have such an amount of carbon monoxide in his blood that was found in Paul’s blood...
Michael Cowel, al-Fayed's official spokesman: "It is more than likely that the blood samples were switched, either accidentally or deliberately. They were somehow confused. There were many mistakes with tags in the morgue, which has now been proven...”
The French intelligence services also have something to hide in this story. Due to the fact that the remaining corpses still cannot be found, it is no longer so important whether the test tubes were changed by accident or whether it was a specially prepared action. Something else is important. Someone really needed the investigation to last as long as possible. So that there is as much confusion as possible. Test tubes with Henri Paul's blood could well have been replaced with the blood of another person who committed suicide.
For a long time, the investigative authorities insisted that there could be no mistake. This is indeed the blood of Henri Paul. However, the film crew of the REN TV channel, as a result of their own investigation, managed to prove that the blood, in which traces of alcohol and carbon monoxide were found, did not belong to Princess Diana’s driver.
Jacques Mules, the head of the detective police brigade, admitted to our film crew that he took test tubes with the blood of Henri Paul with his own hands and actually mixed up the numbers, giving away a test tube with the blood of a completely different person under the name of Princess Diana's driver.
Jacques Mules, head of the detective police brigade. “This is my mistake. The fact is that I worked for two days in a row and did not sleep at night. Due to fatigue, I mixed up the test tube numbers. I immediately informed the judge about this, but he said that it was not significant.”
It does not matter if the error was corrected immediately. And if not? What if, due to simple oversight or - even worse - deliberately, the results of the analysis remained falsified? There is still no answer to this question
Who is Henri Paul?
Henri Paul, head of security at the Ritz Hotel, is the only official culprit of the tragedy. In the investigative reports, he appears to be a complete neurasthenic and drunkard. Taxology experts point to the presence in Henri Paul’s blood, along with alcohol, of a significant amount of antidepressants. The doctor confirms that she prescribed Paul medications to treat depression. And to reduce cravings for alcohol, since, according to the doctor, the patient abused alcohol.
We decided to check whether the head of security at an elite hotel was actually an alcoholic and drug addict.
Cafe-restaurant "Le Grand Colbert". Henri Paul went here for dinner for many years.
Restaurant owner Joel Fleury: “I bought the restaurant in 1992. Henri Paul was already a regular here... He came here every week. No, he was not an alcoholic. It turned out that we practice in the same flight club - he flies light airplanes, I fly light helicopters.”
On the eve of the tragedy, Henri Paul undergoes a strict medical examination in order to renew his flying license. The doctor examines him and takes blood tests a day before the disaster.
Doctors found no traces of hidden alcoholism or traces of any medications in Henri.
After the death of Henri Paul, very large sums of money were discovered in his account, which, in theory, he could not earn. In total he had 1.2 million francs.
Boris Gromov, intelligence services historian: “Henri Paul, according to some British intelligence officers, was a full-time MI6 agent. His name was often mentioned in the files of this service. It is clear that there is nothing accidental here, and its role is clear. Because high-ranking government officials from various countries often stay at the Ritz Hotel... And serving there as the head of the security service is extremely beneficial for any intelligence service..."
40 minutes before the tragedy, Princess Diana still does not know that the driver of their car will not be Dodie’s personal bodyguard Ken Wingfield, but the head of the hotel’s security service, Henri Paul.
According to the version that the investigation initially had, his car turned out to be faulty. And so the couple set off in Henri Paul’s car. However, eight years later, Wingfield said his car was in good working order. It’s just that Henri Paul, as the head of the hotel’s security service, ordered Wingfield to stay and independently drove Diana and Dodi in his car along a different route. Why was Wingfield silent for so many years? What was he afraid of?
Diana's security guard Trevor Rhys-Jones, leaving the Ritz Hotel, sat down in his usual place - on the seat next to the driver, which is called the "dead man's seat." Due to the fact that during an accident it is most vulnerable. But Rhys-Jones survived. And Diana and Dodi al-Fayed, who were in the back seat, died. Today, the only survivor can say nothing about what happened in the tunnel. He has lost his memory and does not remember anything that would shed light on the events of that night. We can only hope that Rees-Jones will recover over time. But whether he will have time to say everything he remembers is unknown...
Dodi al-Fayed's bodyguard has been on the operating table for a long time. And despite the more severe wound, the doctors no longer doubted: the patient would live. At the same time, for some reason, they are trying to save Princess Diana in an ambulance.
The car is standing. It is impossible to perform procedures while moving.
In fact, according to experts, the princess died because someone decided that there was no need to go to the hospital. What is this, a mistake? Doctors' nerves? After all, they are people too.
Or maybe someone needed Diana to die?
When it was all over, the decision was made to send the princess's body on a special flight to London.
The plane from Paris to London flies no more than an hour. It would seem that there is no reason to linger in Paris, however, when the body of Princess Diana was taken to a British clinic, an incredible thing became clear. It turns out that before Diana’s corpse had time to cool down, it was hastily embalmed in violation of all the rules. And they prepare for burial. All this happens in Paris. While the special plane, without turning off the engine, waits for its sad cargo.
Michael Cowel, al-Fayed's official spokesman: "In violation of French law, this was carried out on behalf of the British Embassy, which, in turn, admits that it received instructions from a certain person."
The name of the person who ordered the embalming could not be established. The drugs used during embalming do not subsequently allow repeated examinations of the corpse. If British doctors wanted to re-find out what state, say, the princess’s state of health was in a few seconds before the disaster, they would not be able to do this.
That is why there are versions that perhaps some kind of gas was sprayed into the car, which made Henri Paul lose his orientation. Today it is impossible to confirm or refute this version.
Meanwhile, al-Fayed Sr. is convinced that Diana’s body was embalmed in order to hide the sensational fact. In his opinion, the English princess was pregnant with his son.
Virginie Bardet, photographers' lawyer: “We will never know whether Diana was pregnant. All documents are classified, only the cause of death has been made public: internal bleeding.”
EPILOGUE
The evidence collected is enough for numerous novels, but not enough for the Crown Prosecution Service. Non-functioning road surveillance cameras at the scene of the tragedy, witnesses of the accident dying one after another, the never found white Fiat Uno, carbon dioxide from the driver’s blood from nowhere, fabulous sums in the driver’s accounts, the criminal slowness of the French doctors and the too obvious haste of those who embalmed the body pathologists... The version of the contract killing has not been refuted by anyone. But it hasn't been proven either.
Jacques Mules, head of the detective police brigade: “There was a banal accident. Everything has been checked and rechecked a thousand times. And the search for a conspiracy, the details pulled from the finger... Espionage passions are ordinary fruits of fantasy. In the eyes of Great Britain and even the entire West, Princess Diana was a symbol of a beautiful dream. A dream cannot die in such an ordinary way.”
BY THE WAY
On August 31, the day of Lady Di’s death, Channel One will show the new film “Princess Diana. Last day in Paris" (21.25). And immediately after it ends at 23.10 - the Oscar-winning film “The Queen” with Helen Miren in the title role. About the reaction to the tragedy of the royal family.
“We weren’t going to stir up the royal family’s dirty laundry.” But after the assassination of John Kennedy, the death of Princess Diana is perhaps the loudest story. Using the example of the investigation into the death of Princess Diana, we wanted to understand how such cases are investigated in the West. Is the government interfering? Do politics influence such investigations?
We managed to learn a lot. And I would strongly recommend that the authorities pay attention to the role of American intelligence services in this story. After all, it is known that Diana was the object of surveillance and control on their part, especially in recent months. If they opened up their materials on Diana, I’m sure we would learn a lot of interesting things. Or maybe they would even find out the name of the killer.
Diana's story is unusual. If she had shown a little hypocrisy, or, to put it simply, simple worldly wisdom, everything would have been perfect for her! But she preferred the right to love who she wants to the throne.
The story of Prince Charles, in my opinion, is still awaiting its assessment. After all, look, in spite of everything - the will of his mother, state interests, public opinion - he has loved his Camilla for many years now.
Everything else is small compared to this...
Guys, we put our soul into the site. Thank you for that
that you are discovering this beauty. Thanks for the inspiration and goosebumps.
Join us on Facebook And In contact with
Princess Diana is a stronghold of purity and an example to follow. She has a number of behavior patterns that are familiar to the royal family, and her style is still copied. However, we want to talk not so much about Diana, Princess of Wales, but about Diana Frances Spencer - a woman not so familiar to us outside the royal image.
We are in AdMe.ru learned about another, more human and dramatic side of Lady Di's life. Two motives were invariably intertwined in her fate: the desire to give happiness and the impossibility of becoming happy herself. This is exactly what the facts we discovered indicate.
One of the first to draw attention to the problem of AIDS and debunking myths about this disease
At the opening of the UK's first AIDS ward, Princess Diana defiantly took off her gloves and shook hands with every patient. This gesture was intentional: Lady Di was trying to dispel myths about people infected with AIDS, which were stigmatized at the time. Subsequently, she visited sick children many times, transferred funds to relief funds, and also did not shy away from personally communicating with HIV-infected people.
Since childhood I have not been my mother's favorite
Diana Spencer was not rich enough to neglect her work. The entire inheritance of Earl Spencer was passed down through the male line, which is why Lady Di, who had not yet been married, unlike her sisters, earned as much as she could. She cleaned friends' houses, taught dance lessons to teenagers, and worked as a nanny's assistant and kindergarten teacher.
She was worried about her weight and developed bulimia before the wedding.
After 13 meetings with her future husband and the decision to get engaged, Lady Diana became seriously concerned about her weight and began to fall into unhealthy states. It all started with a thoughtless phrase from the groom, and ended with an eating disorder - bulimia. By the time of the wedding, the girl’s waist had decreased in girth by 20 centimeters; it “melted from February to June.” Diana's condition was also influenced by endless jealousy: she saw Charles secretly exchanging gifts with his first love, Camilla.
The honeymoon turned out to be not a fairy tale, but a horror
“By this point, my bulimia was completely uncontrollable. The attacks were repeated 4 times a day. Everything I could find, I immediately devoured, and after a couple of minutes I felt sick - it exhausted me.”
Princess Diana
“Wearing a protective vest, I tried to walk along a strip that was obviously cleared of mines and I can say that it was very scary. What is it like for those who have neither vests nor miners, who have to risk their lives every time they go for water, those who are simply forced to live among minefields?!”
Princess Diana
In one of the cities of Angola, a few days before the arrival of the princess, teenagers playing football were blown up on a field that had not been completely cleared. It was through such a field that Lady Diana walked, wearing a bulletproof vest and a protective mask against bullets - this is how she spoke out in support of the movement against anti-personnel mines.
Problems in marriage haunted everyone: from bed to social events
After the wedding and honeymoon spent together, it became obvious: Charles and Diana, who was 13 years younger than him, had nothing to talk about. The girl had specific, if not limited, tastes in literature, was not interested in her husband’s hobbies and ridiculed his piety. In matters of love, as Lady Di admitted, the prince “had no need”: for 7 years they secluded themselves three times a week, which seemed insufficient to her, and then that too disappeared.
Hug the leprosy patients she visited in India
Along with the myths about HIV-infected people, Princess Diana tried to dispel rumors about people with leprosy. She first visited them at Mother Teresa's leper colony in India and hugged each one, and then became a patron of The Leprosy Mission.
Cheated on her husband as revenge
An unhappy marriage and a husband who was in awe of another woman pushed Princess Diana to try to find out what true love is. Her lovers include many men: from a riding instructor to a heart surgeon. The most famous is the bodyguard Barry Mannaki - it was about his removal and, as the princess herself believed, her faked death that she recalled, calling it the biggest blow of her entire life.
Regularly visited children with cancer
The tragic death of Diana was perceived by many as a personal tragedy; a huge number of books, films and musical works are dedicated to it. Why Princess Diana was so popular among ordinary people, we will try to understand this material.
Childhood and family
Diana Frances Spencer is a representative of an old aristocratic dynasty, the founders of which were the descendants of kings Charles II and James II. The Duke of Marlborough, Winston Churchill and many other famous Englishmen belonged to her noble family. Her father, John Spencer, was Viscount Elthrop. The future princess's mother, Frances Ruth (née Roche), was also of noble birth - her father held a baronial title, and her mother was a confidant and lady-in-waiting of Queen Elizabeth. 
Diana became the third girl in the Spencer family; she has two older sisters - Sarah (1955) and Jane (1957). A year before her birth, a tragedy occurred in the family - a boy born on January 12, 1960 died ten hours after birth. This event seriously affected the already less than ideal relationship between the parents, and the birth of Diana could no longer correct this situation. In May 1964, the Spencer couple gave birth to the long-awaited heir Charles, but their marriage was already falling apart at the seams, the father spent all his time hunting and playing cricket, and the mother took a lover.
From early childhood, Diana felt like an unwanted and unloved child, deprived of attention and love. Neither her mother nor her father ever said to her the simple words: “We love you.” The divorce of her parents was a shock for the eight-year-old girl, her heart was torn between her father and mother, who no longer wanted to live as one family. Frances left the children to her husband and left with her new chosen one for Scotland; Diana’s next meeting with her mother took place only at the wedding ceremony with Prince Charles.
In early childhood, Diana was raised and educated by governesses and home teachers. In 1968, the girl was sent to the prestigious private school West Hill, where her older sisters were already studying. Diana loved to dance, drew beautifully, and went in for swimming, but other subjects were difficult for her. She was unable to pass her final exams and was left without a matriculation certificate. School failure was caused more by a lack of self-confidence and low self-esteem, rather than by low intellectual abilities.
In 1975, John Spencer inherited the title of Earl from his deceased father, and a year later he married Raine, Countess of Dartmouth. The children disliked their stepmother, boycotted her and refused to sit at the same table. Only after the death of her father in 1992, Diana changed her attitude towards this woman and began to communicate warmly with her.
In 1977, the future princess went to Switzerland to continue her education. Homesickness forced her to return without graduating from school. The girl moved to London and got a job.
In English aristocratic families, it is customary for grown-up children to work on an equal basis with ordinary citizens, so Diana, despite her noble origins, worked as a teacher in the Young England kindergarten, which still exists in the respectable London district of Pimlico and is proud of its connection with the royal family .
She lived in a small apartment, given to her by her father when she came of age, and led a lifestyle typical of English youth. At the same time, she was a modest and well-mannered girl, avoided noisy London parties with marijuana and alcohol, and did not start serious affairs.
Meeting Prince Charles
Diana's first meeting with Prince Charles took place in 1977 at the Spencer family estate in Althorp. The heir to the British crown was then dating her older sister Sarah, the girl was even invited to the palace, which indicated serious plans for her. However, Sarah was not eager to become a princess; she did not hide her passion for alcohol, because of which she was expelled from school, and hinted at infertility. 
The Queen was not satisfied with this state of affairs, and she began to consider Diana as a possible bride for her son. And Sarah happily married a calm, reliable man with a wonderful sense of humor, bore him three children and lived a happy family life.
The queen's desire to quickly marry her son was caused by his relationship with Camilla Shand, an intelligent, energetic and sexy blonde, but not well-born enough to become the heir to the throne. And Charles liked such women: experienced, sophisticated and ready to carry him in their arms. Camilla was also not averse to becoming a member of the royal family, however, as a smart woman, she had a backup option in the person of officer Andrew Parker-Bowles. But Andrew’s heart was occupied for a long time by Princess Anne, Charles’s sister.
The marriage of Camilla and Bowles became a solution to two problems at once for the royal family - at that time Charles served in the navy, and when he returned, he met his beloved as a married lady. This did not stop them from continuing their love relationship, which did not stop with the appearance of Lady Diana’s prince in her life. Looking ahead, we add that eight years after the death of Lady Spencer, the prince married Camilla.
Diana was a modest, pretty girl without a trail of scandals and with an excellent pedigree - an excellent match for the future heir to the throne. The Queen persistently invited her son to pay attention to her, and Camilla was not against her lover’s marriage to a young, inexperienced person who did not pose any threat to her. Submitting to the will of his mother and realizing his duty to the dynasty, the prince invited Diana first to the royal yacht, and then to the palace, where, in the presence of members of the royal family, he proposed to her.
The official announcement of the engagement took place on February 24, 1981. Lady Di showed the public a luxurious sapphire and diamond ring, which now adorns the finger of Kate Middleton, the wife of her eldest son.
After the engagement, Diana left her job as a teacher and moved first to the royal residence in Westminster, and then to Buckingham Palace. It was an unpleasant surprise for her that the prince lived in separate apartments, continued to lead his usual lifestyle and rarely spoiled the bride with attention. 
The coldness and aloofness of the royal family negatively affected Diana’s psyche, her childhood fears and insecurities returned, and her attacks of bulimia became more frequent. Before the wedding, the girl lost 12 kilograms; her wedding dress had to be sewn in several times. She felt like a stranger in the royal palace, it was difficult for her to get used to the new rules, and the environment seemed cold and hostile.
On July 29, 1981, a magnificent wedding ceremony took place, which was seen on television screens by about a million people. Another 600 thousand spectators greeted the wedding procession on the streets of London, all the way to St. Paul's Cathedral. On that day, the grounds of Westminster Abbey could barely accommodate everyone who wanted to take part in this historical event.
Princess Diana's wedding. Chronicles
There were some incidents - the luxurious taffeta dress was badly wrinkled during a ride in a horse-drawn carriage and did not look its best. In addition, the bride, during the traditional speech at the altar, mixed up the order of Prince Charles's names, which violated etiquette, and also did not swear to her future husband of eternal obedience. Royal press attaches pretended that this was the plan, forever changing the text of the wedding vows for members of the British court.
Birth of heirs and problems in family life
After a gala reception at Buckingham Palace, the newlyweds retired to the Broadlands estate, from where a few days later they set off on a honeymoon cruise to the Mediterranean. When they returned, they settled in Kensington Palace in west London. The prince returned to his usual way of life, and Diana began to expect the birth of her first child. 
The Princess of Wales's pregnancy was officially announced on November 5, 1981. This news caused rejoicing in English society, people were eager to see the heir to the royal dynasty.
Diana spent almost her entire pregnancy in the palace, gloomy and deserted. She was surrounded only by doctors and servants, her husband rarely came to her chambers, and the princess suspected something was wrong. She soon learned of his ongoing relationship with Camilla, which Charles did not even try to hide. Her husband's infidelities depressed the princess; she suffered from jealousy and self-doubt, and was almost always sad and depressed.
The birth of the first-born William (06/21/1982) and the second son Harry (09/15/1984) did not change anything in their relationship. Charles continued to seek solace in the arms of his mistress, and Lady Di shed bitter tears, suffered from depression and bulimia, and drank sedative pills by the handful.
The intimate life of the couple practically disappeared, and the princess had no choice but to find another man. He became Captain James Hewitt, a former military man, courageous and sexy. In order to have a reason to see him without arousing suspicion, Diana began taking riding lessons.
James gave her what a woman could not get from her own husband - love, care and the joy of physical intimacy. Their romance lasted nine years, it became known in 1992 from Andrew Morton’s book “Diana: Her True Story.” Around the same time, recordings of intimate conversations between Charles and Camilla were made public, which inevitably led to a loud scandal in the royal family.
Divorce of Diana and Charles
The reputation of the British monarchy was under serious threat, protest sentiments were brewing in society, and it was necessary to urgently solve this problem. The situation was aggravated by the fact that in just over ten years Diana had become the favorite of not only the British people, but also the world community, so many came to her defense and accused Charles of inappropriate behavior.At first, Diana's popularity benefited the royal court. She was called the “queen of hearts”, “the sun of Britain” and “the people’s princess” and was put on a par with Jacqueline Kennedy, Elizabeth Taylor and other great women of the 20th century.
But over time, this universal love finally destroyed the marriage of Charles and Diana - the prince became jealous of his wife for her fame, and Lady Di, feeling the support of millions, began to boldly and confidently declare her rights. She decided to show the whole world evidence of her husband’s infidelity, told her story on a tape recorder and handed over the recordings to the press.
After this, Queen Elizabeth disliked Princess Diana, but the royal family could not stay away from the scandal, and on December 9, 1992, Prime Minister John Major officially announced Diana and Charles' decision to live separately.
In November 1995, Lady Di gave a sensational interview to the BBC channel, in which she spoke in detail about her suffering caused by her husband's infidelities, palace intrigues and other unworthy actions of members of the royal family.
Candid interview with Princess Diana (1995)
Charles responded by portraying her as a psychopath and hysterical and demanding an official divorce. The Queen supported her son, awarded her former daughter-in-law a generous allowance, but deprived her of the title Your Royal Highness. On August 28, 1996, the divorce proceedings were completed, and Diana again became a free woman.
last years of life
After her divorce from Charles, Lady Di tried to arrange her personal life again in order to finally find female happiness. By that time she had already broken up with James Hewitt, suspecting him of hypocrisy and greed.Diana really wanted to believe that men loved her not only for her title, but also for her personal qualities, and the Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan seemed to her to be just such a person. She fell in love with him without looking back, met his parents and even covered her head as a sign of respect for Muslim traditions.
It seemed to her that in the Islamic world a woman was protected and surrounded by love and care, and this was exactly what she had been looking for all her life. However, Dr. Khan understood that next to such a woman he would always have to remain on the sidelines, and was in no hurry to propose marriage.
In the summer of 1997, Diana accepted an invitation from Egyptian billionaire Mohammed al-Fayed to relax on his yacht. An influential businessman, owner of luxury real estate in London, wanted to get to know such a popular person better.
So that Diana would not get bored, he invited his son, film producer Dodi al-Fayed, to the yacht. Lady Di at first considered this trip as a way to make Dr. Khan jealous, but she herself did not notice how she fell in love with the charming and courteous Dodi.
The tragic death of Princess Diana
On August 31, 1997, Lady Di and her new lover died in a fatal accident in the center of Paris. Their car crashed at breakneck speed into one of the supports of the underground tunnel, Dodi and driver Henri Paul died on the spot, and the princess died two hours later in the Salpêtrière clinic. 
The driver's blood contained an alcohol content several times higher than the permissible limit, and the car was moving at great speed, trying to break away from the paparazzi pursuing it.
Diana's death was a huge shock for the world community and gave rise to many rumors and speculation. Many blamed the royal family for the death of the princess, believing that the accident was staged by the British intelligence services. Information appeared in the press that the driver was blinded by a laser by a man on a motorcycle in order to avoid Diana’s pregnancy from a Muslim and the subsequent scandal. However, all this is from the field of conspiracy theories.
Princess Diana's funeral
All of England mourned the death of the “people's princess”, because before this no person of royal blood had been so loved by the common people. Under public pressure, Elizabeth was forced to interrupt her vacation in Scotland and give her former daughter-in-law the necessary honors.
Diana was buried on September 6, 1997 at the Spencer family estate in Althorp in Northamptonshire. Her grave is hidden from prying eyes on a secluded island in the middle of the lake, access to it is limited. Those wishing to honor the memory of the “people’s princess” can visit the memorial located not far from the burial.
Reasons for popular love
Princess Diana enjoyed the support of the British not only because she gave birth to two heirs and dared to expose the vices of the crown prince. This is largely the result of her charitable activities.For example, Diana became one of the first famous people to talk about the problem of AIDS. The disease was discovered in the early 1980s, and even ten years later, little was known about the virus and how it spreads. Not all doctors decided to contact people infected with HIV, for fear of contracting a fatal disease.
But Diana was not afraid. She visited AIDS treatment centers without a mask or gloves, shook hands with patients, sat on their beds, asked about their families, hugged and kissed them. “HIV does not turn people into a source of danger. You can shake their hands and hug them, because only God knows how much they need it,” the princess urged. 
Traveling through third world countries, Diana communicated with leprosy patients: “When meeting them, I always tried to touch them, hug them, to show them that they were not outcasts, not outcasts.”
Having visited Angola in 1997 (there was a civil war there at that time), Diana walked through a field that had just been cleared of mines. No one guaranteed complete safety - the likelihood that mines remained in the ground was very high. Returning to Britain, Diana launched an anti-mine campaign, calling on the army to abandon this type of weapon. “Angola has the highest percentage of amputees. Think about it: one in 333 Angolans lost a limb to mines.”
During her lifetime, Diana did not achieve “deminization,” but her son, Prince Harry, continues her work. He is a patron of the charity The HALO Trust, whose goal is to free the world from mines by 2025, that is, to neutralize all old shells and stop the production of new ones. Volunteers cleared mines in Chechnya, Kosovo, Abkhazia, Ukraine, Angola, and Afghanistan.
In her native London, the princess regularly visited homeless centers and took Harry and William with her so that they could see with their own eyes the other side of life and learn compassion. Prince William later claimed that these visits were a revelation for him and he was grateful to his mother for this opportunity. After Diana's death, he became a patron of the charities that she had previously supported.
At least three times a week she went to children's hospices, where children dying from cancer were kept. Diana spent at least four hours with them. “Some will live, others will die, but while they are alive, they need love. And I will love them,” the princess believed.
Diana changed the face of the British monarchy. If earlier they were associated among ordinary people with yet another suffocating measures like tax increases, then after her actions, as well as a 1995 BBC interview (“I would like monarchs to have more contact with the people”), the monarchy turned into a defender of the disadvantaged. After Lady Di's tragic death, her mission continued.
The book “The Real Diana” by Lady Colin Campbell, the same aristocratic writer close to royal circles who has already written a book about the Queen Mother that shook the whole world, has appeared on the shelves of British bookstores. Now she has revealed unknown facts about Diana's life in the royal family.
Lady Campbell claims that Diana's father, the ambitious Lord John Spencer, harbored a plan for many years to marry his daughter to Prince Charles. But it wasn’t Diana who was meant at all, but her older sister Sarah.
And when Charles’s father, Prince Philip, began looking for a bride for him, Sarah Spencer was one of the first to be considered. But this union did not take place because Sarah’s statement was published in the press: “I don’t care whose wife I become, a prince or a garbage man, as long as there is love between us!” After all, the Queen, as you know, cannot stand anyone from her family discussing their personal life in public.
The future Princess Diana was the youngest of the three Spencer daughters. "Diana's family hoped she would marry Prince Andrew," writes Colin Campbell. - Diana kept his photograph on her bedside table the entire time she was studying at West Heath school. Her family even nicknamed her the Duchess - that would have been Diana’s title if she had become the wife of Andrew, Duke of York.”
The youth of aristocratic families have known the young offspring of the royal family since childhood, so Diana knew everyone - Charles, Andrew, Anna, and Edward. But it was with Andrew that she had a childhood friendship - according to Lady Campbell, in infancy they played together on the grounds of the royal Sandringham estate, where the Spencers rented a mansion. This right was granted by King George VI to his friend, Diana's maternal grandfather. In addition, the Windsor and Spencer families had long-standing connections: one of Diana's great-grandmothers was the mistress of George IV and, according to rumors, even gave birth to an illegitimate child. And grandmother Ruth (as well as grandmother Cynthia on her mother’s side) served as a maid of honor to the Queen Mother. John Spencer himself performed the honorary duties of Queen Elizabeth's equerry.
After Sarah left the race, the Spencer family council decided to urgently replace her with Diana, the writer claims. Diana was ordered to attend all events where Charles appeared. And then the opportunity to get closer to the heir to the throne finally came - at one of the country receptions, Diana saw that Charles had gone for a walk alone. “In a field, near a haystack, the prince stopped and sat down. Diana came up and sat down next to her: “You really miss Lord Mountbatten, right? Now you really need someone to take care of you!” - she said. Not long before this, Charles had lost his beloved great-uncle and mentor, Lord Mountbatten, and he really needed sympathy,” says Lady Campbell.
The butler Paul Burrell, who served there at that time, writes about how Diana first arrived at the royal Balmoral Castle as Charles’s personal guest (he, in turn, also wrote a book about Diana, “Royal Duty”).
The fact is that Diana made a mistake - she brought with her only one evening dress for three days. She was lucky - the evenings turned out to be warm, and everyone gathered in an informal setting - in a barbecue house. So no one except Paul Burrell noticed her miscalculation. However, it’s forgivable - Diana was only nineteen years old, while the rest of Charles’s company were over thirty, or even forty. Moreover, even though she was an aristocrat, she worked as a modest teacher in a kindergarten and lived in a rented London apartment, and not at all with her father and stepmother, with whom she felt uncomfortable. “She acted modestly and often blushed,” recalls Paul Burrell. - Over time, the ladies of the court noticed the meagerness of her wardrobe and ordered something for her: a blue skirt, a collarless jacket of the same color, matching shoes and a white blouse with a stand-up collar.
It was this costume that the princess wore when her engagement to Prince Charles was publicly announced on February 24 at Buckingham Palace.”
Lady Colin Campbell believes that this same suit later played a bad joke on Diana: “She put on a ready-made blue suit, which fit her baggyly. In it she seemed much fuller than she actually was. When she saw photos of herself in the press, she muttered, “Oh my God, I’m so fat!” Charles tried to console her by saying that she looked great. And at the same time he pinched her on the fold of fat on her waist.” Lady Campbell believes that it was this moment, after which Diana set herself the goal of losing weight before her wedding, that was the beginning of her notorious bulimia.
“For three days Diana starved herself, after which she broke down and ran to the nearest candy store for candy. She only stopped when she had eaten the entire box. After which she was horrified, rushed into the bathroom and used the well-known “two fingers in the mouth” method. Deciding that this was a great way out of the situation, Diana began to do this every day,” writes Lady Campbell. The dressmaker who was working on the wedding dress grumbled - once again the outfit had to be sewn in. After all, Diana lost 12 kilograms in a short time. She looked great. The same could not be said about the state of her nerves. “As usually happens with bulimia, she began to have mood swings, and there were causeless bouts of sobbing. Over time, Charles had to take a sip of all this,” says Lady Campbell.
According to her information, Diana showed a tendency towards bulimia from school. It was difficult for young Lady Spencer to control how much she ate. “Classmates recall that she could eat a dozen slices of bread at one time. And then three more full bowls of baked beans,” the book says. And it started at the age of eight - that is, exactly when Diana’s parents were getting divorced.
DID DIANA HAVE THE RIGHT TO MARRY CHARLES?
The divorce of John and Frances Spencer became one of the most discussed social scandals of the late 60s. Everyone condemned Frances, who, without waiting for a divorce, took a lover. No one wanted to hear that the real reason she left her husband was abuse.
Diana's mother claimed that her husband beat and humiliated her. But she had no witnesses... As a result, custody of the children - three daughters and a son - went to John. “And he soon sent them to boarding schools and took himself a new wife, whom his offspring hated,” writes Lady Campbell. At the same time, the children also condemned their own mother. “She should have stayed with us! I would never, ever abandon my children! It would be better if I died! - Diana said, even as an adult.
Lady Campbell claims that Charles also lacked parental love since childhood: his mother Elizabeth was too busy with government affairs, and his father subjected his every action to ruthless criticism, from which Charles developed something like a neurosis.
They say that even as an adult, Charles once could not resist tears when he heard from his father: “Everything you say is complete nonsense!” - in response to discussions about architecture, which Charles had a good understanding of. Charles's first (and, as it turned out later, his only lifelong) love, Camilla Shand, chose the handsome royal guard officer Andrew Parker-Bowles over him, whom she married, despite Charles' persistent courtship.
And when, six years after her marriage, Camilla, having lost interest in her husband, nevertheless responded to the love of the Prince of Wales, their marriage was no longer possible - even if she had divorced, the heir to the throne cannot marry a divorced woman. Nevertheless, at the ball at the Royal Polo Club, these two kissed in front of everyone.
It was then that Prince Philip urgently began to look for a bride for his son, for whose role Diana was somewhat hastily chosen. Lady Campbell believes that for some time Charles believed that young Spencer would be able to give him what he so passionately dreamed of - that is, selfless and reckless love. “But here’s the problem: Diana, who really sincerely liked Charles, also suffered from a “dislike complex,” therefore, instead of loving someone, she needed someone to love her herself,” writes Campbell.
Preparations for the wedding were kept secret for as long as possible. Paul Burrell recalls: “When the royal jeweler David Thomas brought a case containing a selection of engagement rings to the palace, the servants were told that it contained rings intended as a gift for Prince Andrew on his 21st birthday.
Although the rings were obviously women's. Charles asked the Queen to make the choice. Diana later told her friends: “I would never have chosen such a tasteless ring. I would prefer something simpler and more elegant."
According to Lady Campbell, when Charles proposed to Diana, he implored her to think carefully before answering. After all, a member of the royal family has many responsibilities, every step is visible, you need to be able to keep your face, and you can immediately forget about personal freedom. “But Diana agreed instantly, without any hesitation. It seems that she simply could not imagine that any difficulties could follow her wedding with the prince. She was raised on the romance novels of Barbara Cartland, where after the wedding the ending immediately comes: “And they lived happily ever after, loving each other...”
Lady Campbell writes.
Previously, there was no doubt that Diana at least met one of the main requirements for the bride of the heir to the throne. It is known that before the wedding, the queen’s personal gynecologist examined her and declared that Diana was healthy and innocent. On this occasion, one friend of Camilla Parker-Bowles even quipped: “It may well be that Lady Diana was chosen precisely because she remained the only virgin aristocrat of marriageable age in this country.” But Lady Colin Campbell, having interviewed Diana’s school friends, makes a sensational statement: “Diana was only seventeen when she met young Daniel Wiggin. The son of a baronet, he was a friend of her brother Charles.
And he became her first lover. Soon Diana met the next one - James Coltrust, also the son of a baronet. He was very physically attractive to her, he was just her type of man - tall, dark, muscular.” In addition to them, Lady Campbell lists five more of Diana's premarital lovers. Moreover, the future Princess of Wales, according to her information, was so close to Guardsman Rory Scott that she spent weekends at his parents’ farm, washing and ironing his shirts. And Rory confirmed to the writer that his relationship with Diana was “determinedly not platonic.” Little of! Allegedly, he was not Diana’s first yet.
According to Lady Campbell, there was one more thing that could have upset the wedding if it had been known in 1981.
“The fact that Diana's mother's great-great-great-grandmother Eliza Kewark was an Indian, born in Bombay, was one of the Spencer family's best-kept secrets,” writes Lady Colin Campbell. “After all, if anyone had found out about this, then none of Frances Spencer’s three daughters would have ever been able to marry successfully.”
IS THE PRINCESS TOO FRIENDLY WITH THE SERVANTS?
And so on July 29, 1981, in St. Paul's Cathedral, 32-year-old Prince Charles married 20-year-old Diana Spencer. The ceremony of the fabulous wedding, by all accounts, was watched by 75 million people. It is known that at the wedding, Queen Elizabeth, to celebrate, slightly picked up her skirt and famously danced a jig. It seemed to everyone that this marriage would bring happiness to both the newlyweds and England.
But for Charles and Diana, these hopes were dashed during their honeymoon, which they spent on a cruise in the Mediterranean Sea on board the royal ship Britannia. According to Lady Campbell, it was there that it became clear that Charles was not able to devote enough time to his young wife, by her standards, and Diana was not able to come to terms with this. The prince plunged into his own affairs several times a day - looking through business papers, or even just for fun reading something on philosophy. Meanwhile, Diana was languishing with boredom and complaining about life. “Bulimia had by then severely undermined her nervous system,” writes Lady Campbell. It ended with Charles having an irresistible desire to call Camilla Parker-Bowles directly from the yacht Britannia, locked in the bathroom of his own cabin.
Diana accidentally overheard their conversation. There was gossip about Charles' affair with Camilla in royal circles, but until recently Diana led a completely different life, and these rumors did not reach her. Now she found out everything and demanded that her husband end his relationship with Camilla.
“The worst thing was that the newlyweds, apart from a passionate desire to be loved and happy, had very little in common,” says Lady Campbell. So footman Paul Burrell, who after the wedding was made the personal butler of the Prince and Princess of Wales, recalls how Charles used to sit all evenings downstairs in the library, listening to Haydn, while Diana was playing Whitney Houston in her room on the second floor. In terms of her interests, she was an ordinary resident of London.
Perhaps she is kinder and more sympathetic - this is what her work with children taught her. Having become Princess of Wales, Diana had the opportunity to do what she had long been disposed to do - help people. Paul Burrell tells of the horror he experienced when he was driving somewhere with the princess, and she suddenly stopped next to a vulgarly made-up girl in a short skirt, freezing in the damp wind. While the butler was breaking out in a cold sweat, imagining the headlines of tomorrow's newspapers: “Princess Diana spends time in the company of prostitutes,” his patron handed the girl 100 pounds and said: “Buy yourself something warm. And so that the next time I pass here, you are better dressed.” Moreover, after a couple of weeks, Diana actually made sure that the girl was now waiting for clients in a warm leather jacket.
But Diana did not share Charles’s interests in art, philosophy, fishing and hunting. When, after her first participation in the royal hunt, according to the ritual, her cheeks were smeared with blood taken from the belly of a freshly killed deer, cut with a hunting knife, Diana shuddered in disgust. But not so long ago, Charles initiated Camilla into a hunter in the same way, and she was delighted with the medieval rite! “Even the sports in which Diana was strong - tennis, swimming, dancing - were not those that Charles appreciated, who preferred horse riding,” Lady Campbell claims.
In the first months, Diana and Charles lived in Buckingham Palace, which, as you know, is a real labyrinth of endless corridors, halls and rooms. As soon as Diana moved further away from her apartment, she became lost. After all, no one thought to give her a tour of the palace.
Somehow Diana learned the way to the pool and also to the throne room, where she was allowed to take ballet and tap dancing lessons. Diana fluttered there in tights, not far from two ancient thrones, standing on their gilded legs under a heavy burgundy canopy with gold tassels. One higher, for the Queen, the other lower, for the Duke of Edinburgh.
As for Charles's parents, in their own way they tried very hard to be affectionate and hospitable with Diana. Every now and then in the evenings, when Diana got tired of sitting alone, she called the royal page: “Please find out, will the Queen be dining alone today?” He went to report and received the answer: “Please tell Lady Diana that I will be happy to have dinner with her at 8:15.” The crowned mother-in-law never refused her.
But the atmosphere was too formal for intimate conversations. What can we say about the crowded receptions that Diana now had to attend. The Queen, being an excellent hostess, always made sure that no guest sat at the table twice with the same neighbor. And Diana always wanted to sit with Prince Charles.
In a word, irritation accumulated. According to Lady Colin Campbell, even the royal dogs began to seem disgusting to Diana: “During tea parties with her mother-in-law, these corgis hovered around Diana like a little demon, dripping saliva onto her shoes. And she slowly kicked them in the side. And then she complained to her husband: “They smelled me! Do they think my legs are steaks?” Diana also disliked the labrador Sandringham, who belonged to Charles himself.
She complained: “You pay more attention to this animal than to me.” In the end, Charles, tired of quarreling with his wife over the dog, found nothing better than to take Sandringham to the veterinarian and euthanize him. Although Diana did not ask for anything like that. She just wanted Charles to spend more time with her, because she felt so lonely... “After the death of the dog, to which Charles was very attached, something seemed to die in the prince himself,” writes Lady Campbell.
With whom the princess found an outlet, it was with the servants. She often sat with the silverware keeper, Victor Fletcher. Or chatting in the kitchen with chef Robert Pine, who regaled her with rustic jokes and homemade ice cream. Or in the pantry drying dishes with Paul Burrell. “It ended with Prince Charles, to his great surprise, finding footman Mark Simpson in the princess’s bedroom.
He sat on the edge of the bed and calmly talked with Diana, who was not at all embarrassed that she was not dressed decently enough,” recalls Burrell. This Mark smuggled a Big Mac from McDonald's into the palace for her.
It was thanks to her friendship with the servants that Diana learned that her husband, in her absence, still maintained a relationship with Camilla. One day, while waiting for Burrell in the pantry, she looked into the notebook where he wrote down the guests expected at the table. "Mr and Mrs Oliver Hour and Mrs Parker Bowles for dinner", "Mrs Candida Lucette-Green and Mrs Parker Bowles for dinner", "Mr and Mrs Parker Bowles with children."
DIANA STRIKES BACK
Subsequently, collaborating in 1992 with journalist Andrew Morton, who wrote the book “Diana. Her true story,” the princess said that, while pregnant with William, she threw herself down a wooden staircase in front of her husband. Out of despair and powerlessness to change anything. Lady Colin Campbell writes: “In fact, according to the testimony of the servants present at that scene, everything was not so. She simply slipped on the slippery wooden steps and fell. Fortunately, everything worked out - for both Diana and William." According to her information, Diana more than once tried to play on Charles’s feelings, imitating suicide attempts. Once, in the heat of a quarrel, she took a penknife and held it over her wrist - however, without even scratching herself. Another time she poked herself in the leg with a lemon squeezer.
Well, Charles... “At the slightest sign of an impending showdown, he simply turned and left,” writes Lady Campbell.
According to the writer, the affairs that Diana eventually began to have on the side were explained partly by the need for happiness and love, and partly by the desire to arouse at least jealousy in her husband. But Charles did not react. “Knowing his wife’s relationship with banker Philip Dunne, the prince personally invited him to join them on holiday in Switzerland,” Campbell claims. Diana's father-in-law and mother-in-law viewed Diana's novels completely differently. When they heard rumors about their daughter-in-law's next hobby - her own bodyguard Barry Mannaki - he was hastily transferred to a run-of-the-mill police department. Diana was most amazed that her lover so easily agreed to break up with her.
After all, he could, in the end, resign! It soon became clear that the story did not end there. “Barry was going to sell the Diana love story to one of the tabloids,” writes Lady Campbell. “Not even a few weeks passed before he died. Diana did not believe that his death was accidental, seeing it as the machinations of the secret services.”
As for the red-haired officer James Hewitt, with whom Diana also had an affair and whom many now believe is Prince Harry's biological father, Lady Campbell firmly rejects this possibility. According to her information, Diana had an affair with Barry after Harry was born, and with Hewitt even later. By the way, the same story ended up repeating itself with Hewitt - the palace found out about their relationship, and Diana’s lover was transferred to serve in Germany for two years.
But trying to prevent a scandal was as useless as trying to hold back water with a sieve.
At first, Diana and Charles decided to separate, which was impossible to keep secret. Then the same book by Andrew Morton came out, written based on conversations with Diana. And to top it all off, the princess herself gave a television interview in which she told the whole world about her problems with piercing frankness: “I loved my husband very much and wanted to share both grief and joy with him. I thought we were a very good couple." - “Do you think that Mrs. Parker-Bowles played a role in the breakdown of your marriage?” - “You see, there were three of us in this marriage. A little cramped, isn’t it?” In the same television interview, Diana spoke about her bulimia.
And when asked if she plans to eventually become a queen, Diana replied: “I would like to be the queen of people’s hearts, but I can’t imagine myself being the queen of this country.” Finally, she also admitted that she had an affair with James Hewitt.
This interview truly turned the already popular Diana into the queen of people's hearts. Millions of people reasoned: not only is she actively involved in charity work, she brings hope to people with cancer and AIDS, the homeless, the poor, those affected by landmines... She is also a sincere, loving and at the same time deeply unhappy person. But Diana became a decidedly unsuitable person for Windsor Castle.
PINK GRANDMOTHER, BROWN GRANDMOTHER
The Queen could not ignore the scandals surrounding her son's marriage indefinitely, and eventually made the difficult decision to officially divorce. Considering that there was no actual marriage for a long time, this struck Diana terribly. Paul Burrell recalls: “On the table lay a letter on the stamp paper of Windsor Castle, written in the Queen’s recognizable clear handwriting. It began with the words “Dear Diana...” and ended, as usual: “With love, from mom.” The princess was greatly offended by the letter's mention that the queen had consulted the government and the church. “But this is my marriage! No one has the right to interfere in my husband’s and my problems! - she shouted. - They are telling me about the interests of the country.
But why doesn’t anyone care about my interests or the interests of my children?” Diana sat down at the table and wrote to the queen, asking for time to think. But the very next day a letter arrived on the same topic from Prince Charles. To Diana's fury, some of the wording in the letters from her husband and mother-in-law coincided verbatim. For example, “a personal and national tragedy” or “a depressing and confusing situation in which we all find ourselves.”
After the divorce, Diana lost her title of Royal Highness and from now on had to curtsey even to her own sons at official events. She was even more upset that Charles now went entirely to her hated rival, Camilla. However, the new situation also had its advantages. For example, freedom.
Now Diana has access to cash again. Throughout the marriage, she had to use only the card or sign checks: “Welsh”. But it’s awkward to somehow pay in this way at the cinema or in a fast food restaurant. In addition, all expenses were in full view of the mother-in-law, which was also tiring. Paul Burrell recalls: “The first thing Diana did was to take twenty of her dresses and suits to a second-hand store, and from this alone she earned about 11 thousand pounds in cash. So the young princes saw paper money for the first time, and they really liked it. Especially because the queen's face is on the banknotes. The princes immediately nicknamed the five-pound note “blue grandmother,” the ten-pound note “brown grandmother,” and the fifty pounds “pink grandmother.” It was the “pink granny” that William and Harry vied with each other to try to grab when their mother, laughing, handed them money.”
And then Dodi al-Fayed appeared in Diana’s life.
“No one would have traded her for a career under any circumstances - Dodi’s special attitude towards work gave him a lot of free time, and he willingly devoted it to Diana in whatever quantities she wanted,” writes Lady Campbell. - In addition, they had a lot in common: they loved the same films, books, music. These two could have found true happiness and lived together until old age, if not for that terrible accident. By the way, the only person who survived in her, bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, having restored his memory, said that the last sound he heard from the dying Diana was a groan: “Dodie”...
The causes of the accident have not yet been figured out. “The only thing that can now be said with almost certainty, many years later, is that the paparazzi following the princess’s car were not directly to blame for her death, as originally thought,” writes Lady Campbell. “The investigation, which lasted several years, established that there were traces of white paint on the mangled remains of Diana’s black car. This means that the cause of the accident was a collision with a mysterious car that fled the scene. Despite years of joint searches by French and British police, this car was never found.”
Reflecting on all this, the writer recalls Diana’s plans to move with her sons to America, which Paul Burrell told her about. “These plans were unlikely to please the British elite,” she claims.
The butler himself recalls it this way: “The princess showed me a magazine with a plan of a house that was sold in California on the ocean coast. We sat down on the floor in the living room and began to plan: here will be William’s room, here will be Harry’s, here will be the main hall, and here will the servants live. She dreamed of morning runs on the beach, of bright sunshine, unlike London. “We could also get a dog there,” Diana said. - Labrador...”
Loading...
