Russia exterminated small nations just like the North American Indians. Bitter truth.
The facts are below in the article. Not only the hated Anglo-Saxons destroyed and humiliated the natives they conquered, but, unfortunately, Russian colonialists often did the same in the Caucasus, Siberia and Asia.

During the broadcast of the program “Meeting Place” on the NTV channel, American journalist Michael Bohm said that if the Indians had not been killed in America, then such a state as the USA would not have arisen. This statement caused a stormy reaction in the studio. In response to accusations against him, Michael Bohm tried to say that this is normal practice when colonizing new territories, hinting at Russia, but was a little surprised when the show’s host Andrei Norkin told him that Russia allegedly “did not pursue a policy of exterminating local population and, moreover, sought to preserve the language, culture and traditions of the small peoples that were part of the Russian Empire and the USSR."
Original taken from tanya_mass in If we had not killed the Indians, there would be no USA - Michael Bohm

*** *** ***
Well, now below is our Russian-Caucasian Orthodox-patriotic international commentary on this mutual nonsense, Bohm, Norkin and Tanya Mass, who repeated after them (a “Russian Frenchwoman” who often posts various unverified fakes). There is another victim of the ideological myth that supposedly “Russia did not destroy small nations” - this is a certain Sandra Nika
- see her post https://sandra-nika.livejournal.com/1804456.html.
Unfortunately, there are many such people among various “Russian patriots” - they are accustomed to scolding the West, the United States, blaming them for all mortal sins, forgetting that Russia has also brought a lot of evil to this world, despite the fact that it has probably done more good. ))

Christ God, enlighten and enlighten all the lost - Nazis, communists, atheists, sectarians, pagans, infidels and false Orthodox, and have mercy on all of us, according to Your great mercy! Amen+
***
First, the North American States did kill most of the indigenous Indian population. Various Protestant and sectarian communities have especially tried to do this.

Secondly, Norkin’s statement is also fundamentally incorrect that allegedly “Russia did not pursue a policy of extermination of the local population and, moreover, sought to preserve the language, culture and traditions of the small peoples that were part of the Russian Empire and the USSR.”
Let us recall, for example, the history of the Russian “development” of the North, Siberia and the Far East. After all, the reports of the atamans who wrote to the king in the 17th century about how they subjected local tribes to fire and sword have been preserved.
Such a formidable people as the Daurs, who lived on the Amur and for two centuries actively resisted Russian expansion, completely disappeared. Someone should read the notes of Dezhnev, Khabarov and other “developers”, how they completely burned the settlements of the Daurs, Tungus, Manchus, Evenks and other peoples who refused to pay tribute to the Russians. The Daurs responded by switching to active armed resistance, but the forces were unequal and the Daurs were completely exterminated. Other small nationalities of Siberia were also destroyed.

Some small peoples disappeared, whom Russian merchants and especially “Orthodox” Old Believers, and later Soviet fishermen specifically poisoned with alcohol in order to clear the rich lands of unnecessary people.

It was the Russian language, culture and traditions that were imposed on all newly annexed peoples; local languages ​​and cultures were suppressed and persecuted - this is a historical fact. You need to read the notes of Russian missionaries and this is reflected there.

It also happened, for example, in the Caucasus. As a result of the stupid and erroneous Russian policy in the Caucasus (which subsequently led to the long and bloody Caucasian War), many of its peoples, who had been Orthodox long before the Russians, since the first centuries of the new era, were turned away from Orthodoxy.

The Circassians-Adygs-Kabardians were the first to join Russia in the Caucasus; let us remember the wife of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, Maria Temryukovna, the daughter of the Kabardian ruler. This is the 16th century and then the Circassian peoples still adhered to the Orthodox Greek law. But the Russian church tradition (not ideal and distorted, from the point of view of Greek Orthodoxy) and the Church Slavonic language were imposed on them in worship. This largely turned the Circassians away from the Russians and from Orthodoxy as such (unfortunately). Only a part of the Kabardians (Mozdok) remained, who remained faithful to Orthodoxy, while maintaining loyalty to their national traditions.

People did not want to become Russian, but wanted to remain the nationality in which they were born, while remaining Orthodox.

In Tsarist Russia, until the mid-19th century, the Russian language, culture and traditions, as well as the Russian version of Orthodoxy, were forcibly imposed on all these peoples. In the western Caucasus, two dozen Adyghe-Circassian peoples were almost completely exterminated; the remainder were deported to Turkey, like some of the other Caucasian peoples.

The most recent people in the Caucasus to accept Islam, only in the 19th century, were the Vainakh peoples - the Chechens and Ingush. Before that they were either Christians or semi-pagans. This became a great Caucasian tragedy (Islamization of the Vainakhs and their further confrontation with the Russians, Cossacks and neighboring Christian peoples of the Caucasus). The absolutely stupid policy of the Russian authorities also led to this.

Even in purely Orthodox Georgia, soon after its annexation to Russia, mass peasant uprisings began, which were brutally suppressed by Russian troops. The uprisings were in response to the closure of many churches and monasteries and the Russification of church services. Bishops and priests in Georgia at that time were appointed almost exclusively from Russians.

In South Ossetia, which together with North Ossetia became part of Russia (and before the Georgian principalities), the Ossetians were forcibly registered as serfs to the Georgian landowners, although the Ossetians had never obeyed them and a united Ossetia entered Russia before Georgia. Naturally, the Georgian princes paid the Russian administration sitting in Tbilisi to carry out this lawless seizure of lands and people into slavery. The Ossetians, of course, raised an uprising, which was suppressed by Russian troops. Therefore, some Ossetians, as a sign of protest, converted to Islam and went to Turkey.
Similar incidents occurred in North Ossetia. (But, thank God, even in such conditions of national oppression on the part of the Russians and Georgians, the majority of Ossetians, at least in the slightest degree, remained faithful to Orthodoxy, again, I repeat - despite the betrayal on the part of the Russians and Georgian neighbors, who were also actually then it will be hard, not for the princes, but for the common people). The Russian language, culture and traditions were imposed everywhere.

The Georgian princes imposed their language and traditions on the South Ossetians and Abkhazians. It also happened in Georgia during Soviet times. There was a total Georgianification of South Ossetians and Abkhazians. In North Ossetia, during Soviet times, there was forced Russification; there was even a period, since 1981, when Ossetian schools in North Ossetia were generally closed. And in Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenians did not have their own national schools; they taught only in Azerbaijani until the 1960s. Then a few Armenian schools were opened, under the elder Aliyev.

Well, let’s remember the great migrations of peoples in the 1940s to Siberia and Kazakhstan. The deportees were strictly forbidden to teach their children their language. It didn't last that long though. And this is also a fact.

Learn history and don’t spread fakes, on both sides.
Sorry if something is wrong. Don't be offended.
Best regards, Iskander and his friends.

p.s. With the Americans, of course, everything is clear, they are the descendants of sectarians and bandits, but our Orthodox people do not need to lie that in Russia everything was fine in interethnic relations, that other peoples were not exterminated, that the Russian language, culture and traditions were not imposed on them, but we must speak the truth, and only the TRUTH, that all kinds of violence on the part of Russia towards foreigners also took place, until about the middle of the 19th century, then the situation changed a little, but a lot of blood had already been shed and hatred was intensified, which led to the division of the unitary Russian Empire into Soviet republics in 1917-1920. The national question played a significant role in the fall of the empire...
Of course, Russia showed itself to the natives in general more humanely than other empires and powers, which often completely destroyed and/or enslaved the population of their colonies. There is considerable benefit in the fact that the Russians shared their great culture and education with foreign nationalities, which contributed to their enlightenment and involvement in world civilization. But there was also bad and evil and bad too, especially from Russian officials, merchants and some priests. There is no need to forget anything.

I thought about Kadykchansky’s post about the influence of accuracy on the passage of time, especially the comment.

A phantasmagoric question arose: what if all these magical improbabilities and sensational insights regarding the course of history and the physical appearance of past eras, which suddenly surged at once and captivated hundreds of thousands of minds today, are nothing more than...

The result of the fact that some ignoramus who has picked up the technologies of regressive hypnosis and similar techniques that have become available to everyone, or has simply gotten hold of some device that allows them to travel through time (I don’t think this is completely impossible), accidentally I made a couple of extra movements there. As a result, previously non-existent artifacts, maps, treatises, sacred books and others like them are now appearing before our eyes, and everything is turning upside down before our eyes?

Or maybe someone deliberately decided to correct the course of history, and instead of doing it in the present, which was energy-consuming, they quickly went back in time, clicked on a couple of dots, and - voila?

Maybe no one was “hiding” anything from us? Maybe we, while triumphantly debunking the “global lie,” are simply witnessing a past that has just changed under someone’s manipulation?

I have been living on the Iberian Peninsula for two decades. I’ve never heard that there were Crimean Taurians here, but even three-year-olds know about the Moors.

It was always surprising that there was nothing left of the Moors in the country, although they lived here from 711 to 1452. nothing at all, I looked into all corners of the country and searched.

and we go into one not very touristy palace (Marquis de Pombala in Oeiras), and we see panels made of azuleijous, tiles, where, for a couple of tens of square meters, there are battle paintings of knights in armor chasing Cossacks in trousers and dragging them by their forelocks:

Flag of the Ottoman Ataman Empire, as far as I understand:

the boy-keeper of the museum could not really explain anything, he just bleated that this was probably a battle with the Taurians.

Comrades, I was a guide in this country for several years, I haven’t heard anything about the brands...

and I saw such scenes in museums - a huge number, men in trousers, morocco boots, fair hair and in turbans:
in the background, did you see what kind of boyar? the scene of Christ being taken down from the cross, by the way.

also looks quite like a Russian monarch:

pay attention to the caps:


this one in an ermine cape and a BOYAR hat is PONTIUS PILATE, as I understand it...

Russian buffoon on the plot of the descent from the cross:

comrades, well, this is already too much - Russian buffoons are participating in the removal of the Savior from the cross... it would be nice if the “buffoon” were dressed in Portuguese fashion, one could write off that the artist painted in the realities of his time. BUT HOW WOULD THE PORTUGUESE ARTIST FROM EVORA IN 1560 KNOW WHAT OUR BUCKLES LOOK LIKE???

I'm already tired of being surprised by such interesting things... what kind of ethnicity is this? Tartars? Do we have anything to do with them? So they drove the Moors out of the Pyrenees, or Tartar????

Friends, maybe this is some kind of temporal-spatial turbulence, and we are scratching our heads here?? How could scientists previously not notice all this, and, having noticed, remain tightly silent about the fact that no one guessed for so long?

Having lived for almost 30 years in Siberia, I didn’t even know that from the 17th to the 19th centuries the most severe genocide of the indigenous Siberian peoples was carried out, and the Cossacks. were enslaved and massacred by tribes. When I read the article, my eyes widened. no one remembers this; no one talked about it in school or college. I took a second specialty at university - a guide in my native land, not a word was said about it. I know many representatives of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, everyone treats Russians well (except for the Altaians, perhaps). All my life I thought that the Russians lived in perfect harmony with the small Siberian peoples all the way. or is Wikipedia lying?

An appeal to the ancient history of lands that are generally considered to be " originally Russian” is as shocking as the discovery of the fate of the Indians must be to the average American. This seemingly well-known land begins to speak in an unknown language, sounding like an archaic echo of Kalevala. Numerous toponyms contain the words of the peoples who once lived here.

By the time of the formation of the Kyiv state, the Slavs managed to populate only an insignificant piece - barely 3% - of the territory of the present Russian Federation. Now less than one fifth of the 140-150 million Russians live on these lands; another three-fifths are on later colonized lands inside and another fifth are outside the Russian Federation.

The Russian nationality developed in the XIV-XV centuries. within the framework of the Moscow state, by that time having already displaced the indigenous Finno-Ugric population in the territory of modern Leningrad, Arkhangelsk, Vologda, Kirov, Nizhny Novgorod, Yaroslavl, Ivanovo, Vladimir, Moscow and Ryazan (in the Meshcherskaya lowland) and including within its borders the lands of the peoples of that the same group - Karelians, Nenets, Komi, partly Mari and Udmurts, etc. In fact, by the time of its formation, the Moscow state consisted of more than three-quarters of the territory of the populated and subordinate lands of the Finno-Ugric peoples.

Many of them have disappeared completely to this day: Merya, Muroma, Meshchera. There are less than half a thousand people left in Izhora, and about a hundred in Vod. It is generally believed that these peoples were assimilated. In reality, however, there were usually at least two preconditions for assimilation - the loss of one's language and Christianization. These processes did not always go smoothly and history provides many examples when the Russians simply drove the Finno-Ugric peoples from their lands or exterminated them. Chronicles record back in 1030 the campaign of Yaroslav the Wise to Chud. Nizhny Novgorod was founded by Prince Yuri Vsevolodovich in 1221 on the site of a destroyed town Mordovians after the conquest (and seventeen years later he was burned by Batu Khan and rightly so!). Russian raids of that time forced the Mordovians to create a defensive alliance under the command of Prince Purgas.

Muroma was not completely assimilated by the 11th-12th centuries. a significant part of it moved from the Oka-Klyazma interfluve to the east and joined the Erzya people. In the 14th century, fleeing Christianization and increasing extortions from Novgorod, they went to the Kama Komi-Zyryans, in turn displacing the Mansi beyond the Urals.

Fierce military resistance to Russian expansion was provided by Ob-Ugric princes in the 12th and 14th centuries, but in 1364 the Novgorod army pushed the Ugrians back to the Ob itself and captured the lands right up to its mouth; many Ugrians were forced to flee beyond the Urals. The epic ended with the Moscow punitive expedition in 1499. However, in 1710 another military campaign was required to convert the local population to Orthodoxy.

Vepsians fled en masse from Christianization back in the 15th century. and even later they mixed with other peoples. At the end of the 15th century. a large number of drive was taken by force to the Central Russian lands, and Russians were resettled in their place. At the beginning of the 18th century. Peter I, having built a new capital, repeated the operation, sending a fair part of the local population to Kazan and populating the liberated lands with Russian settlers.

They fought against the Russians on the side of the Tatars for their freedom Marie. Here is an excerpt from their legend, which apparently dates back to the 16th century:

« The Russians wanted to get into the forest because they wanted to live there, but the Mari didn’t let them in. They fought each other continuously. All Russians were driven away to the steppe. Those Mari that came from the valleys began to build houses in the forests so that they would have a place to live. They arranged both the yards and the weight for themselves. And after that all the Mari lived in the forests; they could no longer live in the valleys. The Russians killed them all there».

From the subsequent oppression from Russian settlers, meadow mari moved in groups to the east, to the territory of modern Bashkortostan.

Collection of taxes in 1552-1557. after the defeat of the Kazan Khanate by Ivan the Terrible was accompanied by constant riots Udmurts; as a result of their suppression, some lands were almost completely depopulated (for example, the Udmurts of Arsk and the surrounding area were completely and forever exterminated). They were also forced out of the Vyatka land, which in 1489 was annexed to the Grand Duchy of Moscow.

In the 2nd half of the 16th century. Mordovians left their settlements en masse due to the distribution of its lands to Russian landowners, who housed their serfs there. Fleeing from tsarist repressions after her uprisings and the uprisings of Razin and Pugachev, in which she took part, in the 17th-19th centuries. The Mordovians fled to the Don, to the lower reaches of the Volga, to the Trans-Volga region, and Siberia.

By the end of the 18th century. have practically disappeared Selkups in Tomsk district - some of them moved to the north under demographic pressure from Russian settlers.

Thus, the history of the relationship between the Slavs and Finno-Ugric peoples in Moscow appears to us as a history of assimilation and genocide. But we have not yet touched upon the centuries-old unequal trade exchange of Russian merchants with the northern peoples. And the drinking of these peoples, who are genetically very vulnerable to alcohol, as Indians, continues even now. Even the nationalist artist Bocharov found it necessary to note:

« …Indigenous peoples[Siberia] - The Khanty and Mansi have colossal lands and wealth. They were captured[« oil companies of oligarchs»] , and the rightful owners are destroyed. ... These new colonialists are making the indigenous population drunk. Moreover, they boast that they supply vodka and have fast Burana boats. And they get drunk and die on these Burans. Meanwhile, predators seize the land and uproot the forest. This is pure colonialist policy. During Soviet times, the life expectancy of the Khanty, Mansi and other northern peoples was raised to 52 years, but now it is officially only 31 years. Such beautiful peoples with a unique culture!"(Take power and save peoples. - "Labor Russia" No. 10 (177), 2003).

We must not forget about the disregard for language and culture, which in the current conditions is tantamount to the destruction of the national identity of these peoples. Here is from the appeal of Udmurt teachers who went on hunger strike in September 2004:

« For 10 years in Izhevsk, selfless work was carried out under the auspices and within the framework of the Ministry of Education of the Republic for the development of the culture of the Udmurt people... in the form of the birth and formation of the National State Udmurt Gymnasium... During this time Volkov A.A. Initially, in the person of the Chairman of the Government, and then the President of the Udmurt Republic, he promised to build a new building for the national gymnasium. However, instead, in the summer of 2004, privately and secretly from the high school students, President Volkov A.A. decided to liquidate the Gymnasium... by creating unacceptable conditions for teaching Udmurt children in the Udmurt language when transferring them to Russian secondary school No. 21 on the outskirts of the city».

Those who like to sigh about the “extinction” of the Russian people should know that the main blow of recent years has fallen on the Mordovians and related peoples. If the number of Russians in Russia decreased in 1989-2002. by 3.3%, then Mari- by 6.0%, Chuvash- by 7.7%, Udmurts- by 10.9% and Mordovians- by 21.3%! They are dying out at a rapid pace Komi-Izhemtsy; it is very likely that this is retribution for the rocket industry - for many years their lands have been showered with spent stages of vehicles launched from Plesetsk, incl. containing extremely volatile and toxic substances in environmentally hazardous quantities.

« Oil “rivers”, heptyl “rains”, bauxite “precipitates” - this is what the lands developed by our ancestors and left to us received as an inheritance“- the leaders of the national organization “Izvatas” write in an open letter.

It is interesting that this extinction of the Finno-Ugric peoples began under the Soviet Khrushchev-Brezhnev revisionists. So, for 1959-1989. number Mordovians in the USSR decreased by 10%, and the decline Vepsians And Karelian there was even more. The number of Tver Karelians decreased 10 times - from 150 thousand people. in 1930 up to 15 thousand people. in 2002. In addition, these peoples were consistently deprived of their language, and therefore culture: the number of people whose native language is Komi, Udmurt or Komi-Permyak during this period also decreased noticeably.

The situation with Russian expansion is not at all unique. The statehood of Israel is based on genocide, and the statehood of the United States is based on genocide and slavery. By the way, this trio - Russia, Israel and the United States - are among the most militarized countries in the world, along with several African and Middle Eastern countries.

The Federal Assembly of Russia must urgently liquidate the “Republic of Yakutia”, “Chukchi” and “Nenets Autonomous Okrugs” as subjects of the Federation

The issue of dismembering Russia has not been removed from the agenda. The national question (Russian question) is the weakest side in the unstable political structure of the Russian Federation, most of the territories of which are “republics” and “national autonomies”.

As you know, the Russian people have been deprived of legal personality and all political institutions for 100 years. on your own land, and not reflected in none legislative act, both of the murdered USSR and of the current Russian Federation (it is not for nothing that the Ambassador of the United States to the Russian Federation, John F. Tefft, is the largest specialist in the field of national relations in the post-Soviet space and roams the territory of Russia, resolving this issue in his own way).

There is no place for Russians in Yakutia, this is what the Constitutional Court of the Republic decided. Nomads are displacing the Russian nation, as in many republics within the Russian Federation. This Russophobic legal and factual situation must be urgently resolved by government authorities.

Yakutia is a region with a high level of natural resource economic potential and therefore people are in charge there exclusively Yakuts. Local Russians serve unliterate pastoralists who speak Russian to them and have mostly Russian surnames and given names.

And now our most powerful and largest country in the world has decided with the minds of its deputies and judges that it’s time to get out of Russia and get rid of the Russian “dictate”? This is no longer a question. This has already been done in all the “states” of the former USSR, which they were cut in the same way on the sly during the years of civil confusion and the October Maidan, which is soon 100 years old.

« In Yakutia, a conflict is growing over the right to be considered an indigenous people. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Yakutia at the request of a deputy of the republican parliament from A Just Russia Mikhail Gabyshev led to accusations of hidden separatism. The Constitutional Court agreed with Gabyshev’s proposal to interpret Article 42 of the Constitution of Yakutia as “recognition of the territory of Yakutia as the native land and historical homeland of the Yakut people” with equating to it “indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North.” This decision opened the way for corresponding changes in the constitution.

Opponents point out that in this case the right “to own and use, in accordance with the law, land and natural resources, including ancestral agricultural, hunting, and fishing grounds” will be guaranteed only the Yakuts and the “small peoples of the North”, at that time to the Russians are in fact deprived of it. A very interesting initiative, if you remember that it is in the depths of Yakutia that a third of the world’s diamond reserves are located, not counting other minerals", writes apn-spb.ru.

It is worth reminding Russian-speaking deputies and judges from Yakutia (Sokha) that they are talking and expressing their unconstitutional and, in the opinion of the majority of Russian citizens, wretched thoughts in Russian. And they have neither written nor oral permission from any Russian person to speak, think and write on the “Russian Language” information base, which belongs exclusively to the Russian people. And, even more so, to produce such vile fiction and criminally punishable nonsense in Russian.

I would also like to remind the Yakuts who read these lines in Russian without permission that the history of Yakutia and the Yakut ethnic group invented and elevated to the rank of state policy by a hater of Russians Joseph Stalin. Under him, in a “miraculous” way, without the shedding of even one tear from a squirrel or a fawn, a state (“republic”) arose as part of the RSFSR - back in 1920.

A “state” emerged - autonomy nomadic tribe expelled from Altai, in the nomadic territory of their herds the size of half Western Europe. No survey or referendum was conducted on the fact and possibility of creating this mythical “state” on Russian lands. It was created through the efforts of three Yakuts and Commissioner for Nationalities Joseph Dzhugashvili on April 27, 1920.

In those years, some Russo-minded “fucks” carved Russia into tribal nooks. But the documents and originals of this strange historical trick when the civil war was raging on the territory of the Russian land are not in any modern archive. And those “copies” that claim to be authentic, according to the custodians, are fakes.

This fact calls the very existence and seizure of vast lands called “Yakutia” from Russian possessions into question. Also, at one time, no authentic documents were found on the transfer of the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR. The whole world now knows how this story ended and still shudders, being involved in it. But this territory is the land under fake brand "Yakutia"(that is, land belonging to nomadic herders) - much earlier than the reindeer herders migrated there, was populated and developed by Russian people.

And an example of this is the ancient town beyond the Arctic Circle at the mouth of the Indigirka River. Russian Ustye", which is now more than 430 years old! All cities and towns of the so-called “Yakut” territory were created by Russians settlers and pioneers. There are no facts of the development of these territories by nomads and there cannot be any. This is how Wikipedia writes about the Russians’ exploration of the North, let’s pay attention: in Russian(there are no encyclopedias in Yakut, and they are unlikely to appear in the coming centuries).

« According to the legends of the villagers, Russian Ustye was founded at the end of the 16th century by Russian Pomors, immigrants from the old possessions of Novgorod the Great (presumably around 1570), who fled from persecution by the guardsmen Ivan the Terrible. However, the first mention of the village dates back to 1638, it was in this year that a Cossack detachment led by a Tobolsk Cossack Ivan Rebrov opened the sea route to Indigirka and built two forts in the lower reaches of the river. August 1638 is considered the date of foundation of the village. Simultaneously with the “sea passage”, the Russians reached Indigirka by land and founded the city Zashiversk, which existed until the beginning of the 19th century. By the end of the 17th century, permanent Russian villages appeared at the mouths of northern rivers - Bulun(on Lena), Cossack(on Yana), Russian Ustye(on Indigirka), Pokhodsk(in Kolyma) and others.

According to the surviving legend, fleeing from “grief-misfortune” about four hundred years ago, residents of various Russian cities moved on kochkas along the Arctic Sea to the east, reached Indigirka, settled here and named their village Russian Ustye. It is located at 71 degrees north latitude. The average annual air temperature is −15 degrees. The main occupation of the population is fishing and hunting white fox. Currently, the Russians of Ustyin are classified as a separate cultural and ethnographic group of Russians.

Residents Russian Ustye And Pochodska, living surrounded by local peoples, partly mixing with them, nevertheless, they preserved almost intact native language, oral folk art and, most importantly, truly Russian identity. Apparently, this is why many travelers were surprised by one, at first glance, strange feature: the further north you travel through Yakutia, the more widespread is the knowledge of the Russian language among the aborigines.

First Russian Ustye mentioned in scientific literature, apparently, in 1739 in the reports of a participant in the Great Northern Expedition, Lieutenant Dmitry Laptev. The boat "Irkutsk", commanded by Laptev, froze in the ice near the mouth Indigirki. The crew moved to the village for the winter. Local residents provided the expedition with housing, transportation, and supplied fuel and food. With their help, over the winter it was possible to describe the sea coast from Yana to Kolyma, and also save the ship from imminent death.

Since then, the Russian Ustye has been indicated on all old maps, where, for example, Lipetsk and Kaluga are not there, but it is there. And, apparently, not only because there is a lot of free space in this part of the map. This village is unusual - ethnographic uniqueness, “a fragment of Iceland of Russian life.” Five respectable books, many articles have been written about him, and two films have been made. In 1986, the Pushkin House published the book "Folklore of the Russian Ustya", which the great Russian writer Rasputin V.G. called it “a poetic confession, a self-narration of a mysterious soul, its inspired chant.” Not every village can boast of this. This is where the sea voyage actually began Semyon Dezhnev, culminating in a great geographical discovery. These places were visited at different times by Mikhail Stadukhin, Dmitry Laptev, N. Shalaurov, M. Gedenshtrom, P. Anzhu, P. Kozmin, G. Maydel, Yakov Sannikov, K. Vollosovich.

The first aircraft to appear in the skies of the eastern Arctic in 1929 made one of its landings in Russian Ustye. It is possible that A.S. knew about this village. Pushkin from the stories of a lyceum friend F.F. Matyushkina, who worked in the Kolyma-Indigirsky region in 1820 - 1824».

How a fake state was created for the Yakuts: how was it?

On April 27, 1922, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (VTsIK) adopted a resolution “On the Autonomous Yakut Socialist Soviet Republic” as a federal part of the RSFSR with an administrative center in the city of Yakutsk. This region appeared the largest in Russia and the largest administrative-territorial unit in the world.

In 1920-1921 the question arose about the autonomization of Soviet Yakutia. At this time, the activity of the Yakut national intelligentsia intensified, putting forward the proclamation of the autonomy of Yakutia as the initial task. The draft regulations for the future Yakut Republic were drawn up by a commission chaired by the Yakut writer P.A. Oyunsky from the standpoint of national sovereignty.

(Normal lies and fakes: the Yakut intelligentsia, who even today have to think in Russian, raises the question of autonomy from the Russians, in Russian, and receives all kinds of support from the Jews from the Central Executive Committee of the RSFSR.) January 21, 1921 Political Bureau of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) discussed the issue of the formation of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. First Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR V.I. Lenin supported this project and on February 16, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to form the Yakut ASSR as part of the RSFSR.

One of the initiators of the formation of autonomy in Yakutia was the Soviet statesman and party leader Maxim Ammosov. It was he who raised the question of the formation of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic before the Central Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the People's Commissariat for Nationalities of the RSFSR. Thus, on the basis of Ammosov’s report, the regional party meeting in 1921 adopted a resolution on the implementation of autonomy. The idea of ​​​​forming an autonomous republic was supported at the first congress of revolutionary committees of Yakutia in October 1921.

A resolution was also passed there to hold elections to the Soviets. The state-legal formation of the autonomous republic was completed by a resolution of the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of April 27, 1922. And already in June 1922, the first national Soviet government was created, headed by Platon Oyunsky. It turns out that on the basis of a certain report of a certain Yakut Ammosov, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee on April 27, 1922 created a country for the Yakuts from Russian lands.

“This is the largest region of the Russian Federation. In addition, Yakutia is the largest administrative-territorial unit in the world. Yakutia is larger than the second largest CIS state - Kazakhstan, and is larger in area than Argentina - the eighth state in the world in area.

However, the population of Yakutia is less than one million people, which makes its population density one of the lowest in Russia (only the Chukotka and Nenets Autonomous Okrugs have a lower density).” Documents about all these fantastic events were created much later and are fakes, as some historians and source scientists tell us. We have a huge territory within the Russian Federation, which has already in fact begun to move towards EXIT from the state. Fortunately, the time of troubles, and the enthusiasm of the masses for the Crimean victory, and the turmoil in Ukraine, and the maneuvers in Syria, dispose minds to this nomadic Yakuts.

What should I do?

Yakutia is the same as 10 years ago " Oginsko-Buryat Autonomous Okrug"as part of the Irkutsk region, as " Koryak autonomy"as part of the Kamchatka Territory, along with " Chukotka" And " Nenets"autonomous okrugs, should be immediately, even without referendums and popular votes, deprived of legal personality as “republics” (states) within the Russian Federation. These areas should be poured in as districts into the composition of nearby regions and territories bordering them, populated by Russian people, and preferably dividing them into smaller parts. This legal operation to correct the ugly structure inherited from the Bolsheviks and strengthened by the communist regime must be carried out urgently.

President V.V. Putin in one of his speeches he called the inherited national-territorial division of the Russian Federation “ time bomb" These mines need to start urgently liquidate. And we need to start from the North of Russia. Eliminate mythical states and autonomies, making up the North of Russia. And at the same time, destroy even the thoughts of the nomadic tribes, the majority of whom sincerely love and do not share themselves with the Russian people. And stop being tolerant of the antics of tribal leaders and those standing behind them puppeteers working for the collapse of Russia.

There is no doubt that both chambers of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, with an overwhelming number of votes, will quickly and decisively create and vote for the appropriate package of documents, as was the case during the reunification of Crimea with Russia. And the Legislative Assemblies of all subjects of the Russian Federation, where the overwhelming majority are deputies of the party with the self-explanatory name “ United Russia must urgently begin to amend its own Charters and Constitutions. At least as the deputies of the Krasnodar Territory did in July 1997:

Article 2.1. Charter of the Krasnodar Territory

"1. The Krasnodar Territory is the historical territory of the formation of the Kuban Cossacks, the original place of residence of the Russian people, who make up the majority of the region’s population (as amended by the Law of the Krasnodar Territory of January 4, 2001 N 331-KZ)"

Although in the 1997 edition, there were no words about the “Cossack estate”, but it was written as “the historical territory and original place of residence of the Russian people.” Having become governor from the post of chairman of the “Committee on Nationalities Affairs of the State Duma”, he is now Minister of Agriculture Tkachev decided to burden the Russian people and introduce a separatist catch with the words “about the historical territory of the formation of the Kuban Cossacks.” Now Ukrainian nationalists are claiming this role, while the Russians remain with their original place of residence. But even these lines were life-saving.

Thus, the Charter of the Stavropol Territory states:

Article 3. “...In the Stavropol Territory, inalienable rights are recognized and ensured the peoples living in it, Cossacks, small ethnic communities to preserve identity, culture, language, customs and traditions.”

As we see, there is neither a list of peoples nor an indication of ethnic communities, even if they are populated by refugees from Somalia or Iraq.

Article 5. “The land and other natural resources of the Stavropol Territory are the basis of the life and activities of its inhabitants and cannot be used to the detriment of the interests of the population of the Stavropol Territory.”

Again, the population, residents - without a list of subjects of rights, and this allows you to do any composition of the population and replace Russian people with others and newcomers. Such crafty interpretations allow you to capture ancestral territories of the Russian people immigrants from the land-poor republics of the Caucasus, and this process of ousting Russians has a constant tendency to intensify, and Russian families are quietly moving out of Stavropol under the pressure of Caucasians, and with the connivance of the local authorities. So, the mention of the Russian people in the Charter of the Krasnodar Territory is in fact practically the only legislative mention of the Russian people in the legislative framework of the Russian Federation, except for the Republic of Kolmykia, as a subject of law (legal personality) of Russians.

Article 14. “The Republic of Kalmykia does its best to promote the preservation of the identity and ethnic uniqueness, traditions of the Kalmyk, Russian and other peoples of the republic, especially veneration of elders, respect for women; love and care for children." Current edition 1994...

There are no other references to the Russian people in Russian laws.

Reference: The Yakuts are a nomadic tribe, immigrants from the territories of modern China; The homeland of the Yakuts is Southeast Asia.

SeparatismVRussia

More details and a variety of information about events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet can be obtained at Internet Conferences, constantly held on the website “Keys of Knowledge”. All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite everyone who wakes up and is interested...

In the summer of 1581, the free Cossack Ermak Timofeevich, with the money of the Stroganov industrialists, assembled a detachment of 840 people, recruited from among criminals - Cossacks, Russians, Lithuanians, Germans, Tatars, and armed with a large number of weapons (3 falconette cannons, 300 arquebuses, several hundred Spanish arquebuses shotguns, crossbows, bows, several thousand bladed weapons - sabers, spears, halberds, axes, daggers), built boats (each for 20 people) and, having prepared supplies of food and ammunition, set off in early autumn on a trip across Ural down the Chusovaya River.

The goal of the campaign was well known to everyone - the conquest of the state that had existed in Western Siberia for 150 years. formation of local Tatars, better known as the Siberian Khanate. The reason for the campaign was that the khan refused to pay tribute to Muscovy in furs (annually, sable and squirrel from each person).

For a week, the detachment sailed first along the Chusovaya, then along its tributary Serebryannaya. A winter quarter was set up at the pass across the Urals, and in the spring the Cossacks dragged the boats to the Tagil River and found themselves directly in the possessions of the Siberian Khan.

This was a complete surprise for the Tatars, who, not wanting to tolerate the presence of the Russians who were mercilessly robbing the local population, urgently sent a messenger to Khan Kuchum with news of the misfortune. He was not afraid and sent a detachment of 10,000 horsemen, led by his best military leader Mametkul, against the Russians.

The two armies met off the coast of Tura. It seemed that Ermak would have met his well-deserved death here, BUT the Cossacks had a huge tactical advantage - the presence of firearms. Having lined up in a square, the Russians, with well-aimed and precise fire, managed to keep the Siberians at a distance, repelling their attacks, and when they hesitated, they rushed into a counterattack, deciding the outcome of the battle in their favor.

Desperately trying to stop the Russians, who were advancing on the capital of the state - the city of Isker, the Tatars gave them several more battles, in which they, unfortunately, failed to gain the upper hand, although Ermak lost half of his people.

On October 23, 1582, the Russians took Isker by storm. Local residents, however, did not stop fighting for their independence, starting a fierce guerrilla war against the Russians. They recaptured Isker and destroyed most of Ermak’s detachment (including himself), but the Russians, having received large reinforcements from Ivan the Terrible, suppressed the last pockets of resistance a few years later.

The consequences of the Russian conquest were catastrophic for the Siberian Tatars. Of the approximately 25 thousand representatives of this people, by the end of the 16th century, 80% were physically destroyed or forced to leave their lands to Central Asia. The other peoples of the Khanate (Ostyaks, Voguls, Samoyeds, Yugras), although they did not suffer such numerical losses, were now forced to pay yasak (tribute in furs) for their quiet life.

This is what it is, the Cortez expedition in Russian.

Semyon Dezhnev served as a collector of tribute from the Siberian peoples. One day (c. 1635), having collected tribute, most of the Cossacks with the looted furs went to Yakutsk, and Dezhnev and his detachment remained in the winter hut. And everything would be fine, but he wanted to collect another tribute (for himself and his people personally), which he did.

But the Yakuts did not like this very much, and they decided to recapture their property. Having gathered a detachment, Prince Peleva tried to take the fortress by storm, but was forced to retreat. Prince Allai led the Yakuts (500 people) into a new attack. Dezhnev was wounded in the head, but Allai was also struck down by a spear. Having lost their leader, the Yakuts panicked, and the Cossacks attacked them and killed them ALL. Moreover, they then organized a punitive campaign against the villagers who were trying to return their property, and almost all of them

(at least 3000 people)

exterminated.

Erofei Khabarov, another adventurer (that’s who Russian cities are named after!) used his own funds to gather a small detachment (40s of the 17th century) and went on a campaign to the lands of the Amur peoples down the great river. Naturally, the local peoples (primarily the Daurs) did not greet the Russians with bread and salt, and they certainly did not want to accept Russian citizenship and pay tribute to the White Tsar. Khabarov therefore stormed the cities along the route of his detachment. The Daurian prince Gugudar especially desperately resisted the invaders: his soldiers shot at the Russians to the last, defending their city, which nevertheless fell, even though Khabarov lost a quarter of the detachment under its walls.

The neighboring princes, frightened by the atrocities committed by the Russians in captured cities and towns, nevertheless decided to accept Russian citizenship.

In 1649, Khabarov with 70 Cossacks was sent by the government to the Amur, where in May of the following year he built a fort, called the Achansky town. But he did not take into account an important fact: that area was considered the possession of the Manchus, who at that time created a powerful militarized state in Northern China. The Manchu cavalry drove the Russian invaders out of the prison. The angry Khabarov, with 50 people on three plows, fought off the Manchu chase and sailed down the Amur to kill and rob the local Daurs.

To be fair, not all Russians condoned these atrocities. Having learned about Khabarov’s actions, the official Zinoviev arrived from Yakutsk with a detachment of 150 people. He arrested Khabarov and took him to Moscow to investigate his actions. But Khabarov managed to write a compliment to the tsar that he was so good, he collected a lot of tribute and conquered lands, and

was not only pardoned, but also granted the status of “children of the boyars”

(a high rank at that time).

And this rogue’s mug is now emblazoned on the five-thousandth Russian ruble banknote!

Vladimir Atlasov (1695) served as Cossack head in Kamchatka. He is known for the fact that, using the Koryaks who were loyal to the Russians and the raids on them by the neighboring people - the Kamchadals - as a pretext for war, he mercilessly robbed both of them. At the same time, his detachment suffered almost no losses due to the high efficiency of the latest model muskets, which the Kakzaks were specially allocated from the Anadyr prison.

The Kamchadals have practically disappeared as a people by now, but Atlasov also paid dearly for his atrocities, being killed in 1711 by his own rebellious Cossacks.

But sometimes justice still triumphed, and the natives crushed the Russian troops, as happened, for example, in the winter of 1643 with the detachment of Kurbat Ivanov (74 people), which was completely destroyed on the coast of Lake Baikal by armed Buryats.

Russian-Chukchi Wars (1701-1764)

Having founded the Anadyr fort in 1648, the Russians for 50 years did not organize campaigns in the lands located to the north of it, across the Anadyr River, in Chukotka. By the beginning of the 18th century everything had changed...

In the spring of 1701, the clerk, the son of the boyar Alexei Chernyshevsky, sent people to the Anadar nose (eastern Chukotka). They arrived there and saw a Chukchi settlement (13 yurts) and demanded that the locals pay tribute to the Russian Tsar. The Chukchi replied:

“We have not paid tribute to anyone and will not pay it.”

The Cossacks surrounded the village and attacked it with superior forces. The Chukchi fought bravely, but lost the battle, losing 10 people (almost the entire male population of the village).

The children and women of the vanquished were captured, but the next night almost all of them committed suicide (stabbed to death or strangled themselves), not wanting to endure Russian captivity.

The Cossacks set off further in the morning, and at noon they saw 300 Chukchi on the coast ready to fight. The Russians won the battle easily, destroying 2/3 of the enemy squad. The Cossack commander Alexey Chudinov was sure that Chukotka would now submit to him, but the next day his detachment again met many Chukotka warriors

(about 3000 people, 700 of them on reindeer),

who, having surrounded the invaders, attacked them from all sides.

The battle lasted until the evening, in which, despite the losses, the Chukchi exhausted the Cossacks and the Yukaghirs allied to them, drove them into the swamp and made it impossible for them to retreat.

70 Cossacks and Yukaghirs (half of the detachment, including Chudinov) died, the survivors took up a perimeter defense. The Chukchi Cossacks were under siege for five days until they ran out of food. On the sixth day, the Cossacks made a breakthrough, lost almost all their people, but broke out and ran as fast as they could to Anadar. Chernyshevsky was shocked by the news that the detachment he sent to the north

Only 1/10 remained alive.

The Chukchi dealt a serious blow to the colonialists, but the Russians were not going to give up their lands, creating fortified settlements along the banks of Anadyr.

In 1729, a big war began with the Chukchi.
A detachment of Cossacks Afanasy Shestakov was sent to Kolyma. He was defeated, the Cossack head was killed in battle.

In 1731, a detachment of Ataman Pavlutsky made a campaign from the Anadyr fort to the Bering Strait. This raid was successful; the Russians captured many deer and 300 Chukchi women, who were sent on sleighs to Yakutsk. But no more than a dozen captives arrived there, since all the others committed suicide, not hoping to escape from the Russian monsters.

In 1738, a detachment of Chukchi attacked the Koryaks, Russian allies, and caused them great damage.

In 1741, the Cossacks defeated the Chukchi army. The Chukchi took 6 years to recover from the consequences of this battle.

In 1747, Pavlutsky equipped a huge force (almost 600 people), hoping to put an end to the Chukchi resistance forever. With a vanguard of 80 people, he broke away from the main forces and was ambushed on the Yukagir Hill. The Russian vanguard, together with Pavlutsky, was almost completely destroyed by the Chukchi, who broke away from the main forces of the Russian army.

The war lasted for many more years. Finally, in 1764, the Senate, by order of Catherine the 2nd, counted the losses. It turned out that since the beginning of the century, about

1400000

Rubles, the income amounted to only

29152

Ruble. Catherine was angry, and on her orders the Anadyr fortress was destroyed.